Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Understanding global transition assessments

  • Published:
Quality of Life Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective: Several methods currently used for determining meaningful or important change in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) measures are anchored by global transition items. It can be empirically demonstrated that patients’ responses to these gold standards for change do not adequately incorporate the prior condition, yet these transition items play an influential role in patient–clinician communications and cannot be disregarded. This follow-up study queried patients to better understand how they ascertained their transition assessments. Data source: Prior to their qualitative interviews, the 41 participants in this study had completed 1 year of enrollment in a clinical study with bi-monthly HRQoL telephone interviews that included the SF-36 and a disease-specific HRQoL instrument (asthma, COPD, or heart disease), as well as global transition assessments for each instruments domains. Study design: We used face-to-face cognitive interview and the think aloud approaches to obtain qualitative clues for understanding patient reports of HRQoL changes over time. Interview transcripts were coded using the four components of the Rapkin–Schwarz Appraisal Model: frame of reference; sampling strategy; standards of comparison; and combinatory algorithm. Principal findings: Patients’ explanations for determining global transition item responses often focused on current mobility and fatigue patterns, physicians’ statements about their conditions, comparisons of their current states with the prior health conditions, and strong personal convictions that reflected a resistance to voicing any emotional changes. Patients also expressed primary health concerns, like back pain, that were not related to the chronic conditions (asthma, COPD or heart disease) under investigation. >Conclusions: HRQoL studies and patient–clinician communications that incorporate global transition assessments to anchor the interpretations of HRQoL changes should also consider additional relevant questions to understand the process patients uses to appraise and report changes in HRQoL.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. GH Guyatt D Osoba AW Wu KW Wyrwich GR Norman (2002a) ArticleTitleMethods to explain the clinical significance of health status measures Mayo Clin Proc 77 371–383 Occurrence Handle10.4065/77.4.371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. R Jaeschke J Singer GH Guyatt (1989) ArticleTitleMeasurement of health status: Ascertaining the minimal clinically important difference Controlled Clin Trials 10 407–415 Occurrence Handle2691207 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:By%2BC3cjks1c%3D Occurrence Handle10.1016/0197-2456(89)90005-6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. GR Norman P Stratford G Regehr (1997) ArticleTitleMethodological problems in the retrospective computation of responsiveness to change: The lessons of Cronbach J Clin Epidemiol 50 IssueID8 869–879 Occurrence Handle9291871 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByiH3sjjtlw%3D Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0895-4356(97)00097-8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. K Wyrwich (2002) ArticleTitleStatistical Interpretation of HRQoL Changes in COPD: Development of the MCID Standards and Related Approaches Eur Resp Rev 12 IssueID83 94–103

    Google Scholar 

  5. GH Guyatt G Norman EF Juniper LE Griffith (2002b) ArticleTitleA critical look at transition ratings J Clin Epidemiol 55 900–908 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0895-4356(02)00435-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. FD Wolinsky KW Wyrwich AN Babu K Kroenke WM Tierney (2003) ArticleTitle9–11, Personal stress, Mental health, and the Sense of Control among Older Adults J Gerontol: Soc Sci 58 IssueID3 S146–S150

    Google Scholar 

  7. J Ware M Kosinski JE Dewey (2000) How to Score Version Two of the SF-36 Health Survey QualityMetric, Inc Lincoln, RI

    Google Scholar 

  8. EF Juniper GH Guyatt PJ Feeny LE Griffith (1993) ArticleTitleMeasuring Quality of Life in Asthma Am Rev Respir Dis 127 832–838

    Google Scholar 

  9. GH Guyatt L Berman M Townsend S Pugsley L Chambers (1987) ArticleTitleA measure of quality of life for clinical trials in chronic lung disease Thorax 42 773–778 Occurrence Handle3321537 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaL1c7gtVCjsw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1136/thx.42.10.773

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. GH Guyatt S Nogradi S Halcrow J Singer MJ Sullivan EL Fallen (1989) ArticleTitleDevelopment and testing of a new measure of health status for clinical trials in heart failure J Gen Intern Med 4 101–107 Occurrence Handle2709167 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaL1M3hs1WitA%3D%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. B Glaser (1978) Theoretical Sensitivity Sociology Press Mill Valley, CA

    Google Scholar 

  12. A Strauss J Corbin (1990) Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques Sage Publications, Inc. Newbury Park, CA

    Google Scholar 

  13. G Willis (1999) Cognitive Interviewing: A How-to Guide Research Triangle Institute Research Triangle Park, NC

    Google Scholar 

  14. M Patton (2003) Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods Sage Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  15. M Bauer (2000) Classical content analysis: A review M Bauer G Gaskell (Eds) Qualitative Researching with Text, Image and Sound Sage London

    Google Scholar 

  16. Rapkin B, Schwartz C. Toward a theoretical model of Quality-of-Life appraisal: Implications of findings from studies of response shift. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2004; 14(2).

  17. D Fischer AL Stewart DA Bloch K Lorig D Laurent H Holman (1999) ArticleTitleCapturing the patient’s view of change as a clinical outcome measure J Am Med Assoc 282 1157–1162 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1MvivFahtQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1001/jama.282.12.1157

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. P Heppner D Gonzales (1987) Men counseling men M Scher M Stevens G Good G Eichenfield (Eds) Handbook of Counseling and Psychotherapy with Men Sage California 101–107

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kathleen W. Wyrwich.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wyrwich, K.W., Tardino, V.M. Understanding global transition assessments. Qual Life Res 15, 995–1004 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-006-0050-8

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-006-0050-8

Keywords

Navigation