Skip to main content
Log in

How much do doctors use quality of life information in primary care? Testing the Trans-Theoretical Model of behaviour change

  • Published:
Quality of Life Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript


This study aimed to find out whether General Practitioners (GPs) use quality of life (QOL) information in primary care, to explore their reasoning and to assess any barriers to use. A second purpose was to see whether the Trans-Theoretical Model (TTM) of behaviour change could be applied to doctor’s use of QOL information in primary care. A representative, cross-sectional sample of 800 GPs was approached in a national postal survey; 280 (38%) provided qualitative and quantitative information. Most GPs said that QOL was interesting and important. Users had seen more information and scales, and were more aware of its uses; only 8% had ever used formal standardised questionnaires. The main barriers to implementation were a shortage of time and information, and experience with using QOL assessment. A sizable minority wanted to know more. Seventy-one percent would use QOL to monitor treatment effectiveness. The five stages of the TTM were used to identify whether GP’s were predisposed to use QOL information from their knowledge levels and values. While there was some support for the model, the TTM did not sensitively and reliably discriminate between users and non-users on all variables, and so has limited value here.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others


  1. A. Bowling (1995) Measuring Disease: A review of Disease-specific Quality of Life Measurement Scales Open University Press Buckingham

    Google Scholar 

  2. L. Fallowfield (1990) The Quality of Life: The Missing Measurement in Health Care Souvenier Press London

    Google Scholar 

  3. B. Spilker (1996) Quality of life and Pharmacoeconomics in Clinical Trials EditionNumber2 Lippincott-Raven Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  4. J Addington-Hall L. Kalra (2001) ArticleTitleWho should be measuring quality of life? Br Med J 322 1417–1420 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MzivFGrsQ%3D%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. AJ Carr IJ. Higginson (2001) ArticleTitleAre quality of life measures patient-centred? Br Med J 322 1357–1360 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3Mzhtl2gtQ%3D%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. J Morris D Perez B. McNoe (1998) ArticleTitleThe use of quality of life data in clinical practice Qual Life Res 7 85–91 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1c7kt1WmsQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9481154

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. KM Taylor KG Macdonald A Bezjak P Ng AD. Petrillo ParticleDe (1996) ArticleTitlePhysician’s perspective on quality of life: An exploratory study of oncologists Qual Life Res 5 5–14 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByiD2Mjgt1Y%3D Occurrence Handle8901361

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. SB Detmar NK. Aaronson (2000) ArticleTitleQuality of life assessment in daily clinical oncology practice: A feasibility study Eur J Cancer 34 1181–1186

    Google Scholar 

  9. SB Detmar NK Aaronson LDV Wever M Muller JR. Schornagel (2000) ArticleTitleHow are you feeling? Who wants to know? Patient’s and oncologist’s preferences for discussing health-related quality of life issues J Clin Oncol 18 3295–3301 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3cvotlemtA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10986063

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. P Taenzer M Speca MJ Atkinson et al. (1997) ArticleTitleComputerised quality of life screening in an oncology clinic Cancer Prac 5 IssueID3 168–175 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByiA3Mrlt1Y%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. S Salek N Pratheepawanit IG. Finlay (2000) ArticleTitleUse of quality of life outcomes in routine assessment of patients with cancer: Breaking the barriers Oncology Economics 1 IssueID3 42–46

    Google Scholar 

  12. Royal College of General Practitioners. General Practitioner workload. RCGP Information sheets No.3, August, 1999.

  13. JO Prochaska CC DiClemente JC. Norcross (1992) ArticleTitleIn search of how people change: Applications to addictive behaviours Ame Psychol 47 IssueID9 1102–1114 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByyD3snnsVY%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. D. Rutter L. Quine (2002) Chapter 1 Introduction D. Rutter L. Quine (Eds) Changing Health Behaviour: Intervention and Research with Social Cognition Models Open University Press Buckingham

    Google Scholar 

  15. S. Sutton (2001) A critical review of the transtheoretical model applied to smoking P. Norman C. Abraham M. Conner (Eds) Understanding and Changing Health Behaviour: From Health Beliefs to Self-regulation Harwood Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  16. CS. Rosen (2000) ArticleTitleIs the sequencing of change processes by stage consistent across health problems? Health Psychol 9 IssueID2 172–180

    Google Scholar 

  17. ND Weinstein AJ Rothman SR. Sutton (1998) ArticleTitleStage theories of health behaviour: Conceptual and methodological issues Health Psychol 17 IssueID3 290–299 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1c3otVOkuw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9619480

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. InstitutionalAuthorNameThe WHOQOL Group (1998) ArticleTitleThe World Health Organisation’s Quality of Life assessment (WHOQOL): Development and general psychometric properties Soc Sci Med 46 1569–1585

    Google Scholar 

  19. SE Straus DL. Sackett (1998) ArticleTitleUsing research findings in clinical practice Br Med J 317 339–342 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1czltVSmsw%3D%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. R. Smith (1996) ArticleTitleWhat clinical information do doctors need? Br Med J 313 1062–1068 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByiD2MvjtVE%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. C Saunders M Baum L. Fallowfield (1998) ArticleTitleQuality of life assessments may help some patients Br Med J 317 IssueIDJuly 147 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1czit1aisw%3D%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Suzanne M. Skevington.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Skevington, S.M., Day, R., Chisholm, A. et al. How much do doctors use quality of life information in primary care? Testing the Trans-Theoretical Model of behaviour change. Qual Life Res 14, 911–922 (2005).

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: