Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Development, feasibility and compliance of a web-based system for very frequent QOL and symptom home self-assessment after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

  • Published:
Quality of Life Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We believe that many adverse events following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), particularly relapse and chronic graft-versus-host disease (CGVHD), are preceded by a subclinical period of development that is accessible by frequent psychometric assessment. Documenting these associations could improve future clinical care by extending the potential window for intervention. However, conventional methods of assessing quantity of lite (QOL) in patients in their homes, typically by mailed self-assessment questionnaires, are impractical for very frequent administration. We have developed and implemented a web-based system for measuring short-term (dynamic) changes in QOL by employing brief, online, daily QOL assessments and more extensive, monthly online assessments from patients’ homes. Here we report the feasibility of collecting very frequent patient home self-assessments of QOL via the web for a 52 week participation period; we detail incidence of home web access, accrual, compliance, and satisfaction with the system in an HSCT patient sample. We also describe our integrated web-systems for administering patient recruitment, scheduling, monitoring, and analysis. Our results suggest that very frequent routine collection of QOL outcomes is entirely feasible using our web-based home assessment tool, with good patient compliance and high user satisfaction. We believe our methodology shows great promise for use with other cancer and health populations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • D Osoba (1994) ArticleTitleLessons learned from measuring health-related quality of life in oncology J Clin Oncol 12 608–616 Occurrence Handle8120561

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • CM Moinpour P Feigl B Metch KA Hayden SuffixJr FL Meyskens J Crowley (1989) ArticleTitleQuality of life end points in cancer clinical trials: Review and recommendations. J Natl Cancer Inst 81 485–495 Occurrence Handle2646455

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • GH Guyatt DH Feeny DL Patrick (1993) ArticleTitleMeasuring health-related quality of life. Ann Intern Med 118 622–629 Occurrence Handle8452328

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • CR King M Haberman DL Berry et al. (1997) ArticleTitleQuality of life and the cancer experience: The state-of-the-knowledge. Oncol Nurs Forum 24 27–41 Occurrence Handle9007905

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • NK Aaronson (1988) ArticleTitleQuality of life: What is it? How should it be measured? Oncology (Huntingt) 2 69–76

    Google Scholar 

  • KM Sullivan (1997) ArticleTitleLongterm followup and quality of life after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. J Rheumatol Suppl 48 46–52 Occurrence Handle9150118

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • KM Sullivan E Agura C Anasetti et al. (1991) ArticleTitleChronic graft-versus-host disease and other late complications of bone marrow transplantation. Semin Hematol 28 250–259

    Google Scholar 

  • NE Bush GW Donaldson MH Haberman R Dacanay KM Sullivan (2000) ArticleTitleConditional and unconditional estimation of multidimensional quality of life after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: A longitudinal follow-up of 415 patients. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 6 576–591

    Google Scholar 

  • NE Bush M Haberman G Donaldson KM Sullivan (1995) ArticleTitleQuality of life of 125 adults surviving 6–18 years after bone marrow transplantation. Soc Sci Med 40 479–490 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0277-9536(94)00153-K Occurrence Handle7725122

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • M Haberman N Bush K Young KM Sullivan (1993) ArticleTitleQuality of life of adult long-term survivors of bone marrow transplantation: A qualitative analysis of narrative data. Oncol Nurs Forum 20 1545–1553 Occurrence Handle8278280

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • EP Winer LM Sutton (1994) ArticleTitleQuality of life after bone marrow transplantation Oncology (Huntingt) 8 19–27

    Google Scholar 

  • A Molassiotis OB Akker DW Milligan et al. (1996) ArticleTitleQuality of life in long-term survivors of marrow transplantation: Comparison with a matched group receiving maintenance chemotherapy. Bone Marrow Transplant 17 249–258 Occurrence Handle8640175

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • MA Andrykowski CB Greiner EM Altmaier et al. (1995) ArticleTitleQuality of life following bone marrow transplantation: Findings from a multicentre study. Br J Cancer 71 1322–1329 Occurrence Handle7779732

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • F Baker JR Wingard B Curbow et al. (1994) ArticleTitleQuality of life of bone marrow transplant long-term survivors. Bone Marrow Transplant 13 589–596 Occurrence Handle8054912

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • MJ Hjermstad S Kaasa (1995) ArticleTitleQuality of life in adult cancer patients treated with bone marrow transplantation—a review of the literature. Eur J Cancer 31A 163–173 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0959-8049(94)00464-G Occurrence Handle7718320

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • CS Neitzert P Ritvo J Dancey K Weiser C Murray J Avery (1998) ArticleTitleThe psychosocial impact of bone marrow transplantation: A review of the literature. Bone Marrow Transplant 22 409–422 Occurrence Handle10.1038/sj.bmt.1701358 Occurrence Handle9733263

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • S Earlam C Glover C Fordy D Burke TG Allen-Mersh (1996) ArticleTitleRelation between tumor size, quality of life, and survival in patients with colorectal liver metastases. J Clin Oncol 14 171–175 Occurrence Handle8558193

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • A Coates V Gebski D Signorini et al. (1992) ArticleTitlePrognostic value of quality of life scores during chemotherapy for advanced breast cancer. Australian New Zealand Breast Cancer Trials Group. J Clin Oncol 10 1833–1838 Occurrence Handle1453197

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • JE Herndon S Fleishman AB Kornblith M Kosty MR Green J Holland (1999) ArticleTitleIs quality of life predictive of the survival of patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung carcinoma? Cancer 85 333–340 Occurrence Handle10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19990115)85:2<333::AID-CNCR10>3.0.CO;2-Q Occurrence Handle10023700

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • PA Ganz JJ Lee J Siau (1991) ArticleTitleQuality of life assessment. An independent prognostic variable for survival in lung cancer Cancer 67 3131–3135

    Google Scholar 

  • MR Stockler D Osoba P Corey PJ Goodwin IF Tannock (1999) ArticleTitleConvergent discriminitive, and predictive validity of the Prostate Cancer Specific Quality of Life Instrument (PROSQOLI) assessment and comparison with analogous scales from the EORTC QLQ-C30 and a trial-specific module.European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer. Core Quality of Life Questionnaire J Clin Epidemiol 52 653–666 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0895-4356(99)00025-6 Occurrence Handle10391659

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • VT Chang HT Thaler TA Polyak AB Kornblith JM Lepore RK Portenoy (1998) ArticleTitleQuality of life and survival: the role of multidimensional symptom assessment. Cancer 83 173–179 Occurrence Handle10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19980701)83:1<173::AID-CNCR23>3.0.CO;2-T Occurrence Handle9655308

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • CE Geyer SuffixJr SJ Green CM Moinpour et al. (1998) ArticleTitleExpanded phase II trial of paclitaxel in metastatic breast cancer: A Southwest Oncology Group study. Breast Cancer Res Treat 51 169–181 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1006094403153 Occurrence Handle9879778

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • P Schoffski U Schelenberger CH Kohne et al. (1996) ArticleTitleQuality of life predicts for both response and survival in patients treated for metastatic colorectal cancer. Results of a randomized Phase II study Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 15 213

    Google Scholar 

  • N Bush G Donaldson C Moinpour (2002) ArticleTitleQuality of Life measures as leading indicators of adverse clinical events after bone marrow and stem cell transplantation Clin Therap 24B 9–11 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0149-2918(02)85094-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • P Fayers (1995) ArticleTitleMRC quality of life studies using a daily diary card—practical lessons learned from cancer trials. Qual Life Res 4 343–352 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF01593887 Occurrence Handle7550183

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • AK Aaronson W Bakker AL Stewart FSAM Dam Particlevan N Zandwijk Particlevan JR Yarnold (1987) Multidimensional approach to the measurement of quality of life in lung cancer clinical trials NK Aaronson J Beckman (Eds) The Quality of Life of Cancer Patients Raven Press New York

    Google Scholar 

  • DL Berry C Moinpur BA Blumenstein (1997) ArticleTitleMeasurement of irritative bladder symptoms Oncol Nurs Forum 24 319

    Google Scholar 

  • J Pater D Osoba B Zee et al. (1998) ArticleTitleEffects of altering the time of administration and the time frame of quality of life assessments in clinical trials: an example using the EORTC QLQ-C30 in a large anti-emetic trial. Qual Life Res 7 273–278 Occurrence Handle9584558

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • SE Kooiker (1995) ArticleTitleExploring the iceberg of morbidity: A comparison of different survey methods for assessing the occurrence of everyday illness. Soc Sci Med 41 317–332 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0277-9536(94)00340-Y Occurrence Handle7481926

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • MA Bruijnzeels JC Wouden Particlevan der M Foets A Prins WJ Heuvel Particlevan den (1998) ArticleTitleValidity and accuracy of interview and diary data on children’s medical utilisation in The Netherlands. J Epidemiol Communi Health 52 65–69

    Google Scholar 

  • DM Oleske S Heinze DM Otte (1990) ArticleTitleThe diary as a means of understanding the quality of life of persons with cancer receiving home nursing care. Cancer Nurs 13 158–166 Occurrence Handle2354428

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • LE Carlson M Speca N Hagen P Taenzer (2001) ArticleTitleComputerized quality of life screening in a cancer pain clinic. J Palliat Care 17 46–52 Occurrence Handle11324185

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • G Velikova EP Wright AB Smith et al. (1999) ArticleTitleAutomated collection of quality-of-life data: A comparison of paper and computer touch-screen questionnaires. J Clin Oncol 17 998–1007 Occurrence Handle10071295

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • HE Drummond S Ghosh A Ferguson D Brackenridge B Tiplady (1995) ArticleTitleElectronic quality of life questionnaires: A comparison of pen-based electronic questionnaires with conventional paper in a gastrointestinal study. Qual Life Res 4 21–26 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00434379 Occurrence Handle7711686

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • F Pouwer FJ Snoek der Ploeg HM van RJ Heine AN Brand (1998) ArticleTitleA comparison of the standard and the computerized versions of the Well-being Questionnaire (WBQ) and the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ). Qual Life Res 7 33–38 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1008832821181 Occurrence Handle9481149

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • PA Taenzer M Speca MJ Atkinson et al. (1997) ArticleTitleComputerized quality-of-life screening in an oncology clinic. Cancer Pract 5 168–175 Occurrence Handle9171553

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bell DS, Kahn CE, Jr. Health status assessment via the World Wide Web. Proc AMIA Annu Fall Symp 1996: 338–342.

  • J Buxton M White D Osoba (1998) ArticleTitlePatients’ experiences using a computerized program with a touch-sensitive video monitor for the assessment of health-related quality of life. Qual Life Res 7 513–519 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1008826408328 Occurrence Handle9737141

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • A Cull A Gould A House et al. (2001) ArticleTitleValidating automated screening for psychological distress by means of computer touchscreens for use in routine oncology practice. Br J Cancer 85 1842–1849 Occurrence Handle10.1054/bjoc.2001.2182 Occurrence Handle11747324

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • EP Wright PJ Selby M Crawford et al. (2003) ArticleTitleFeasibility and compliance of automated measurement of quality of life in oncology practice. J Clin Oncol 21 374–382 Occurrence Handle10.1200/JCO.2003.11.044 Occurrence Handle12525532

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • P Flatley-Brennan (1998) ArticleTitleComputer network home care demonstration: A randomized trial in persons living with AIDS. Comput Biol Med 28 489–508 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0010-4825(98)00029-8 Occurrence Handle9861507

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • BD Bliven SE Kaufman JA Spertus (2001) ArticleTitleElectronic collection of health-related quality of life data: validity, time benefits, and patient preference. Qual Life Res 10 15–22 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1016740312904 Occurrence Handle11508472

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • RM Soetikno R Mrad V Pao LA Lenert (1997) ArticleTitleQuality-of-life research on the Internet: feasibility and potential biases in patients with ulcerative colitis. J Am Med Inform Assoc 4 426–435 Occurrence Handle9391930

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • JR Treadwell RM Soetikno LA Lenert (1999) ArticleTitleFeasibility of quality-of-life research on the Internet: a follow-up study. Qual Life Res 8 743–747 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1008963516334 Occurrence Handle10855348

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • LN Pealer RM Weiler RM Pigg SuffixJr. D Miller SM Dorman (2001) ArticleTitleThe feasibility of a web-based surveillance system to collect health risk behavior data from college students. Health Educ Behav 28 547–559 Occurrence Handle11575685

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • National Telecommunications and Information Administration (2000). Falling through the net IV [Online]. Available: http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/digitaldivide/ [April 15, 2002].

  • NUA Internet Surveys (2002). How Many Online? [Online]. Available: http://www.nua.ie/surveys/how_many_online/index.html [April 23, 2002].

  • National Telecommunications and Information Administration (2002). A Nation Online: How Americans Are Expanding Their Use of the Internet [Online]. Available: http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/dn/html/anationonline2.htm [April 15, 2002].

  • Harris Interactive (2002). Internet Penetration Increases to 66% of Adults [Online]. Available: http://www.harrisinteractive.com/harris_poll/index.asp?PID=295 [April 23, 2002].

  • Harris Interactive (2002). Cyberchondriacs Update [Online]. Available: http://www.harrisinteractive.com/harris_poll/index.asp?PID=299 [May 15, 2002].

  • Pew Internet and American Life (2002). Vital Decisions: How Internet users decide what information to trust when they or their loved ones are sick [Online]. Available: http://www.pewinternet.org/reports/toc.asp?Report=59 [May 22, 2002].

  • RJ Cline KM Haynes (2001) ArticleTitleConsumer health information seeking on the Internet: The state of the art. Health Educ Res 16 671–692 Occurrence Handle10.1093/her/16.6.671 Occurrence Handle11780707

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harris Interactive Health Care News (2002). Patient/Physician Online Communication: Many patients want it, would pay for it, and it would influence their choice of doctors and health plans [Online]. Available: http://www.harrisinteractive.com/news/newsletters/healthnews/HI_HealthCareNews2002Vol2_Iss08.pdf [April 23, 2002].

  • NK Aaronson S Ahmedzai B Bergman et al. (1993) ArticleTitleThe European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: A quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst 85 365–876 Occurrence Handle8433390

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • M Haberman N Bush (1991) ArticleTitleDemands of long-term recovery after marrow transplantation Communi Nurs Res 24 62

    Google Scholar 

  • DM McNair M Lorr LF Droppelman (1971) EDITS Manual for the Profile of Mood States. Educational and Industrial Testing Service San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  • JE Ware SuffixJr MK Snyder WR Wright (1976) Development and Validation scales to Measure Patient Satisfaction with Health Care Services. Southern Illinois University Carbondale, Il

    Google Scholar 

  • JE Ware SuffixJr (1976) ArticleTitleScales for measuring general health perceptions. Health Serv Res 11 396–415 Occurrence Handle1030696

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fucella J, Pizzolato J. (1998). Creating Web Site Designs Based on User Expectations and Feedback. Internet Technical Group Newsletter [Online]. Available: http://internettg.org/newsletter/june98/web_design.html [April 15, 2002].

  • Instone K. (1997). Usability Engineering for the Web. World Wide Web Journal [Online]. Available: http://www.w3j.com/5/s3.instone.html [April 15, 2002].

  • IBM (2002). Web Design Guidelines: Design in Action [Online]. Available: http://www-3.ibm.com/ibm/easy/eou_ext.nsf/Publish/572 [April 15, 2002].

  • Useit.com (1997). How Users Read on the Web [Online]. Available: http://www.useit.com/alertbox/9710a.html [April 15, 2002].

  • Weinschenk Consulting Group (2001). Interface Design Guidelines [Online]. Available: http://www.weinschenk.com/tools/guideline_demo/index.htm [April 23, 2002].

  • Communication Technologies Branch, National Cancer Institute (2001). Usability.Gov: Your Resource for Designing Usable, Useful and Accessible Web Sites and User Interfaces [Online]. Available: http://usability.gov/ [April 15, 2002].

  • DJ Bowen A Ludwig NE Bush et al. (2003) ArticleTitleEarly Experience with a web-based intervention to inform risk of breast cancer. Health Psycho 8 175–186 Occurrence Handle10.1177/1359105303008001455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dougherty D. (2001). LAMP: The open source web platform. [Online]. Available: http://www.onlamp.com [May 20, 2002].

  • NE Bush J Wooldridge V Foster K Shaw P Brown (1999) ArticleTitleWeb site design and development issues: the Washington State Breast and Cervical Health Program Web Site Demonstration Project. Oncol Nurs Forum 26 857–865 Occurrence Handle10382184

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • W3C Schools (2002). Browser and other statistics [Online]. Available: http://www.w3schools.com/browsers/browsers_stats.asp [August 1, 2002].

  • Northwest Research Group I. City of Seattle Information Technology Indicators Project (2000). Residential Technology Survey [Online]. Available: http://www.cityofseattle.net/tech/indicators/data20collection.htm [July 29, 2002].

  • JS Light (2001) ArticleTitleRethinking the Digital Divide. Harvard Educational Review 71 709–733

    Google Scholar 

  • R Cullen (2001) ArticleTitleAddressing the digital divide. Online Information Review 25 311–320 Occurrence Handle10.1108/14684520110410517

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, 98109–1024, USA

    N. Bush, D. Milliken, V. Markle & J. Lauson

  2. University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA

    G. Donaldson

  3. Southwest Oncology Group Statistical Center, Seattle, Washington, USA

    C. Moinpour

  4. Washington State University College of Nursing, Spokane, Washington, USA

    M. Haberman

Authors
  1. N. Bush
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. G. Donaldson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. C. Moinpour
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. M. Haberman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. D. Milliken
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. V. Markle
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. J. Lauson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to N. Bush.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bush, N., Donaldson, G., Moinpour, C. et al. Development, feasibility and compliance of a web-based system for very frequent QOL and symptom home self-assessment after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Qual Life Res 14, 77–93 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-004-2394-2

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-004-2394-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation