Abstract
The purpose of the article is to present how, if used to aid the conduction and analysis of interviews, biograms enable the peculiarities of biographical narrative to be incorporated more effectively in the life course perspective. The advantage of this tool is to promote the life course not only as an empirical category, but also as an analytical perspective capable of combining time, process and context, in order to bring out possible biographical paths. At the same time, biograms enable different types of identity-building process, such as analytical syntheses, to be drawn up. As a result, empirical cases can be transformed into theoretical cases (referring to the unit of analysis), moving from an individual story to a sociological ideal type in which to embed the biographical story. This article will first present how biograms can facilitate the conduction of a biographical interview by bringing out the main features of the life course as an analytical perspective. Then, it will be described how the device allows the researcher to inductively order, summarize and categorize the empirical materials collected in order to enucleate suitable conceptual categories for outlining possible identity profiles. For methodological purposes, the application of the biogram to three biographies collected to explore paths of social exclusion will be presented, defining conceptual categories for three identity profiles: The Combative Subject Fighting the Risk of Exclusion, The Intermittently Excluded Subject and The Chronic Outsider.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Notes
The researcher decides how many years to insert in the rows and which life domains to insert in the columns based on the question under investigation and the people whose life stories he/she has collected.
The completed grid did not always include direct references to the socio-historical context. However, from the information entered, the interviewer was able to introduce some references such as the economic crisis of 2009 or social and economic policies in support of precarious work and housing.
Analytical induction overcomes some of the limitations of simple induction. Indeed, the latter bases the relevance of arguments on the accumulation of the observations made: the higher the number of observations that give the same result, the greater the argumentative force of the rule found. However, in qualitative approaches the criterion of “saturation” should not be overestimated, since it seems to refer to a criterion of generalization typical of quantitative research (Cardano 2020).
Therefore, the aim of the sociological ideal type is to unify in a conceptual construct the set of features that the analytical path chosen by the researcher leads to emphasize as relevant. According to Max Weber (1904/1949, 90): “An ideal type is formed by the one-sided accentuation of one or more points of view and by the synthesis of a great many diffuse, discrete, more or less present and occasionally absent, concrete individual phenomena, which are arranged according to those one-sidedly emphasized viewpoints into a unified analytical construct […] In its conceptual purity, this mental construct […] cannot be found empirically anywhere in reality”.
Interview excerpts can be inserted to add to the analysis produced by the biograms. None have been included here so as not to make the text too long. The analyses are reported in a very concise manner for the same reason.
References
Bandura, A.: Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 52, 1–26 (2001)
Barbeiro, A., Spini, D.: Calendar interviewing: A mixed methods device for a biographical approach to migration. Qual. Res. Psychol. 14(1), 81–107 (2017)
Berends, L.: Embracing the visual: using timelines with in-depth interviews on substance use and treatment”. Qual. Rep. 16(1), 1–9 (2011)
Berney, L., Blane, D.: The life grid method of collecting retrospective information from people at older ages. Res. Policy Plann 21(2), 13–22 (2003)
Bonica, L., Cardano, M.: Introduzione In: Bonica, L., Cardano, M. (eds.) Punti di svolta. Analisi del mutamento biografico, 9–26. Il Mulino, Bologna (2008).
Bourdieu, P.: Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge University Press (1977).
Cardano, M.: Defending qualitative research: design, analysis, and textualization. Routledge, New York (2020)
Castel, R.: De l’indigence à l’exclusion, la disaffiliation. In: Donzelot, J. (ed.) Face à l’exclusion, le modèle français, pp. 137–168. Éditions Esprit, Pais (1991).
Charmaz, K.: The grounded theory method: An explication and interpretation”. In: Emerson, R.M. (ed.) Contemporary Field Research, pp. 109–126. Waveland Press, Prospect Heights (1988)
Collins, R.: Interaction ritual chains. Princeton University Press (2004).
Denzin, N.K.: The reflexive interview and a performative social science. Qual. Res. 1(1), 23–46 (2001)
Elder, G., Johnson, M., Crosnoe, R.: The emergence and development of life course theory. In: Mortimer J., Shanahan, M. (eds.) Handbook of the life course, pp. 3–19. Kluwer Academic Publishers New York (2003).
Engel, L., Keifer, M., Zahm, S.: Comparison of a traditional questionnaire with an icon/calendar-based questionnaire to assess occupational history. Am. J. Ind. Med. 40(5), 502–511 (2001)
Freedman, D., Thornton, A., Camburn, D., Alwin, D., De Marco, L.Y.: The life history calendar: a technique for collecting retrospective data. Sociol. Methodol 18, 37–68 (1988)
George, L.: Conceptualizing and measuring trajectories. In: Elder, G., Giele, J. (eds.) The craft of life course research, pp. 163–186. Guilford Press, New York (2009)
Giddens, A.: Central problems in social theory: action, structure and contradiction in social analysis. University of California Press, Berkeley (1979)
Glasner, T., Van der Vaart, W.: Applications of calendar instruments in social surveys: a review. Qual. Quant. 43(3), 333–349 (2009)
Goldenberg, S.: Analytic induction revisited. Can. J. Sociol. 18(2), 161–176 (1993)
Hendry, L.B., Kloep, M.: Lifespan development. Thomson Learning, London (2002)
Kergoat, D.: Division sexuelle du travail et rapports sociaux de sexe. In: Dictionnaire critique du féminisme, 35–44. Puf, Paris (2000).
Kohli, M.: The institutionalization of the life course: Looking back to look ahead. Res. Hum. Dev. 4(3–4), 253–271 (2007)
Lindesmith, A.R.: Addiction and opiates. NJ, Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick (1947)
Marshall, V.W., Mueller, M.M.: Theoretical roots of the life-course perspective. In: Heinz, W., Marshall, V. (eds.) Social dynamics of the life course, pp. 3–33. Aldine De Gruyter, New York (2003)
Mayer, K.: Whose lives? How history, societies, and institutions define and shape life courses. Res. Hum. Dev. 1(3), 161–187 (2004)
Millar, J.: The dynamics of poverty and employment. Soc. Policy Soc. 6(4), 533–544 (2007)
Morselli D., Berchtold A.: Using a life history calendar to survey vulnerability. In: Spini, D., Widmer, E. (ed.), Withstanding Vulnerability throughout Adult Life, 319–336. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore.
Nico, M.L.: Bringing life “back into life course research”: using the life grid as a research instrument for qualitative data collection and analysis. Qual. Quant. 50, 2107–2120 (2016)
O’Rand, A.: Cumulative processes in the life course. In: Elder, G., Giele, J. (eds.) The craft of life course research, pp. 163–186. Guilford Press, New York (2009)
Ortner SB (2001)) Specifying agency The comaroffs and their critics in interventions. Int. J. Postcolon. Stud, 3(1), 76–84.
Parry, O., Thomson, C., Fowkes, G.: Life course data collection: Qualitative interviewing using the life grid. Sociol. Res. Online 4(2), 1–11 (1999)
Ragin, C.C.: ‘Casing’ and the process of social inquiry. In: Ragin, C.C., Becker, H.S. (eds) What is a Case? Exploring the foundation of social inquiry, 217–226. Cambridge University Press (1992).
Ranci, C., Migliavacca, M.: Social vulnerability: A multidimensional analysis. In: Ranci, C. (ed.) Social vulnerability in Europe, 219–249. Palgrave, Basingstoke (2010).
Ricoeur, P.: Time and narrative. University of Chicago Press (1990).
Riemann, G., Schütze, F.: Trajectory as a basic theoretical concept for suffering and disorderly social processes. In: Miller, R. (ed.) Biographical research methods, pp. 107–155. Sage, London (2005)
Robinson, W.S.: The logical structure of analytic induction. Am. Sociol. Rev. 16(6), 812–818 (1951)
Ruiu, G.: The origin of fatalistic tendencies. Econom. Sociol. 6(2), 103–125 (2013)
Ryan, R.M., Deci, E.L.: Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. Am. Psychol. 55, 68–78 (2000)
Saraceno, C. (ed.): Età e corso di vita. Il Mulino, Bologna (2001)
Saraceno, C., Benassi, D., Morlicchio, E.: Poverty in Italy: Features and drivers in a European perspective. Briston University Press (2020).
Schütz, A.: Common-Sense and Scientific Interpretation of Human action. In: Natanson, M. (ed.) Collected Papers: I. The Problem of Social Reality, 3–47. Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague (1962).
Thomas, W.I., Znaniecki, F.W.: The Polish Peasant in Europe and America. Gorham Press, Boston (1918–1920).
Van der Vaart, W.: The time-line as a device to enhance recall in standardized research interviews: a split ballot study. J. Off. Stat.. 20(2), 301–318 (2004)
Weber, M.: Objectivity in social science and social policy [1904]. In: Shils, E.A, Finch, H.A. (eds. and trans.) The methodology of the social sciences, The Free Press, Illinois (1949).
Znaniecki, F.: The method of sociology. New York. Rinehart & Company, (1934).
Funding
The author declares that no funds, grants, or other support were received during the preparation of this manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The author declares no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Acocella, I. Using biograms to promote life course research. An example of theoretical case configuration relating to paths of social exclusion. Qual Quant 58, 2763–2787 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-023-01777-7
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-023-01777-7