Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Correction to: Quality & Quantity https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-022-01353-5
In the original version the authors inadvertently included a sentence which misrepresents the work of Beach and Pedersen (2013) in the section “Does method matter”. The following correction has been made to better reflect the cited work:
“Work that advocates for the use qualitative methods often carries the implication that qualitative evidence is more trustworthy than quantitative evidence, at least for some purposes, e.g., for elucidating causal mechanisms (Beach and Pedersen 2013, Gerring 2017).”
The authors regret the error and have agreed to the correction.
The original article has been corrected.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Avenburg, A., Gerring, J. & Seawright, J. Correction to: How do social scientists reach causal inferences? A study of reception. Qual Quant 57, 785 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-022-01396-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-022-01396-8