Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Cost of doing business index in Latin America

  • Published:
Quality & Quantity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The World Bank's Ease of Doing Business Index (EDBI) has been widely used in analyzes of attracting investments and formulating public policies. Despite its importance in signaling the quality of the countries' business environment, research shows that EDBI does not always offer reliable analyzes. The literature shows that the use of EDBI is associated with several problems, among which is the comparison of different countries, the utilization of variables that do not represent all companies and cities in the country, the disregard of the influence or weight of each variable in the composition of the index and the compensatory aggregation of variables. The present work results reflect the extent to which each of the problems associated with EDBI impairs its ability to signal the quality of the countries' business environment. These results show that eliminating the problems related to EDBI can increase the index's capacity to capture unemployment indicators, gross domestic product per capita, foreign direct investment, government effectiveness, and corruption levels. This research contributes to a more reliable indication of the quality of the business countries' environment by subsidizing decisions such as private investments and company internationalization and government strategies such as assessing and proposing laws to reduce efforts to do business.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and material

http://dx.doi.org/10.17632/b3yvn2pph9.1.

References

  • Alencar, B., Barroso, L.C., Abreu, J.F.: Análise multivariada de dados no tratamento da informação espacial: uma abordagem com análise de agrupamentos. Sistemas, Cibernética e Informática 10(2), 1–7 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, D.W.: Transaction costs. In: Bouckaert, B.D., Geest, G. (eds.) Encyclopedia of law and economics, pp. 893–926. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, M.M., Aldred, M.L.: Business regulation, inward foreign direct investment, and economic growth in the new European union member states. Crit. Perspect. Int. Bus. 9(3), 301–321 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asongu, S., Odhiambo, N.: Doing business and inclusive human development in Sub-Saharan Africa. Afr. J. Econ. Manag. Stud. 10(1), 2–16 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  • Attardi, R., Cerreta, M., Sannicandro, V., Torre, C.M.: Non-compensatory composite indicators for the evaluation of urban planning policy: the land-use policy efficiency index (LUPEI). Eur. J. Oper. Res. 264(2), 491–507 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, W., Paruolo, P., Saisana, M., Saltelli, A.: Weights and importance in composite indicators: mind the gap. In: Ghanem, R., Higdon, D., Owhadi, H. (eds.) Handbook of Uncertainty Quantification. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12385-1_40

  • Belgibayeva, A., Plekhanov, A.: Does corruption matter for sources of foreign direct investment? Rev. World Econ. 155(3), 487–510 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brans, J.P., Vincke, Ph.: Note—a preference ranking organisation method. Manag. Sci. 31(6), 647–656 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.31.6.647

  • Brans, J.P., Vincke, P., Mareschal, B.: How to select and how to rank projects: The PROMETHEE method. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 24(2), 228–238 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breen, M., Gillanders, R.: Corruption, institutions and regulation. Economics of Governance 13(3), 263–285 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Busse, M., Groizard, J.L.: Foreign direct investment, regulations, and growth. The World Bank. 31(7), 861–886 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  • Coase, R.H.: The nature of the firm. Economica 4(16), 386–405 (1937). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0335.1937.tb00002.x

  • Coeurderoy, R., Verbeke, A.: The unbalanced geography of the world’s largest MNEs: institutional quality and head office distribution across countries. Glob. Strateg. J. 6(2), 127–148 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, R.D.: Detection of influential observation in linear regression. Technometrics 19(1), 15–18 (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  • Corcoran, A., Gillanders, R.: Foreign direct investment and the ease of doing business. Rev. World Econ. 151(1), 103–126 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costa, C.A.B., Vansnick, J.C.: MACBETH—an interactive path towards the construction of cardinal value functions. Int. Trans. Oper. Res. 1(4), 489–500 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach, L.J.: Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 16, 297–334 (1951)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cruz, N.F., Marques, R.C.: Structuring composite local governance indicators. Policy Stud. 38(2), 109–129 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ding, Y., Fu, Y., Lai, K.K., Leung, W.J.: Using ranked weights and acceptability analysis to construct composite indicators: a case study of regional sustainable society index. Soc. Indic. Res. 139(3), 871–885 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Djankov, S., La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A.: The regulation of entry. Q. J. Econ. 117(1), 1–37 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Djankov, S., McLiesh, C., Ramalho, R.M.: Regulat. Growth. Econ. Lett. 92(3), 395–401 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, W.: How to use multiattribute utility measurement for social decision-making. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. 7(5), 326–340 (1977)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ekel, P., Pedrycz, W., Pereira Jr, J.: Multicriteria Decision-making under Conditions of Uncertainty: A Fuzzy Set Perspective. Wiley & Sons, Chichester (2020)

  • El Gibari, S., Gómez, T., Ruiz, F.: Building composite indicators using multi-criteria methods: a review. J. Bus. Econ. 89(1), 1–24 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh, N., Saha, R., Bhowmick, S.: SDG index and ease of doing business in India: a sub-national study. ORF Occas. Paper. 199, 1–65 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomes, L.F.A.M., Lima, M.M.P.P.: TODIM: Basics and application to multi-criteria ranking of projects with environmental impacts. Foundat. Comput. Dec. Sci. 16(4), 113–127 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  • Granger, C.W.: Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econom. J. Econom. Soc. 37(3), 424–438 (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendricks, W.A., Robey, K.W.: The sampling distribution of the coefficient of variation. Ann. Math. Stat. 7(3), 129–132 (1936)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IEGKE, Independent Evaluation Group Knowledge Programs and Evaluation Capacity Development.: Doing Business: an Independent Evaluation; Taking the Measure of the World Bank-IFC Doing Business Indicators. World Bank, Washington, DC (2008)

  • Jayasuriya, D.: Improvements in the world bank's ease of doing business rankings: Do they translate into greater foreign direct investment inflows?. Policy Research Working Paper. 5787 (2011)

  • Júlio, P., Pinheiro-Alves, R., Tavares, J.: Foreign direct investment and institutional reform: evidence and an application to Portugal. Port. Econ. J. 12(3), 215–250 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalkan, S.B.: Classification of European union member and candidate countries according to ease of doing business index using fuzzy clustering. Stat. Empr. Econom. J. 12, 25–35 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  • Karama, D.: Ease of Doing Business: Emphasis on Corruption and Rule of Law. MPRA Paper. 58662, University Library of Munich, Germany (2014)

  • Krammer, S.M.: Do good institutions enhance the effect of technological spillovers on productivity? comparative evidence from developed and transition economies. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 94, 133–154 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Libório, M.P., Martinuci, O.D.S., Laudares, S., Lyrio, R.D.M., Machado, A.M.C., Bernardes, P., Ekel, P.: Measuring intra-urban inequality with structural equation modeling: a theory-grounded indicator. Sustainability 12(20), 8610 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Libório, M.P., Bernardes P., Laudares, S., Ekel P.: Evidence of the negative relationship of transaction costs in the economic performance of G7+Brics countries. SSRN Elect. J. (2021a). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3758884

  • Libório, M.P., Martinuci, O.D.S., Machado, A.M.C., Hadad, R.M., Bernardes, P., Camacho, V.A.L.: Adequacy and consistency of an intraurban inequality indicator constructed through principal component analysis. Prof. Geogr. 73(2), 282–296 (2021b)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Machado, D.D.Q., Diniz, G.M., Ogasavara, M.H., Matos, F.R.N.: Doing business: Uma análise comparativa das regulamentações no BRICS. Revista De Administração Contemporânea. 19(3), 355–373 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mardani, A., Jusoh, A., Nor, K., Khalifah, Z., Zakwan, N., Valipour, A.: Multiple criteria decision-making techniques and their applications–a review of the literature from 2000 to 2014. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja. 28(1), 516–571 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maričić, M., Bulajić, M., Radojičić, Z., Jeremić, V.: Shedding light on the doing business index: a machine learning approach. Bus. Syst. Res. J: Int. J. Soc. Advanc. Bus. Inform. Technol. (BIT). 10(2), 73–84 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCormack, G.: Why “doing business” with the World Bank May Be Bad for You. Europ. Bus. Organ. Law Rev. 19(3), 649–676 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKay, A.T.: Distribution of the coefficient of variation and the extended" t" distribution. J. Roy. Stat. Soc. 95(4), 695–698 (1932)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mehrabani, F., Basirat, M., Abdollahi, F.: Examining the effects of doing business on Iran and MENA countries’ economic growth. Int. J. Islam. Middle East. Financ. Manag. 9(1), 2–23 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miguel, B.S., Herrero-Prieto, L.C.: Reliability of creative composite indicators with territorial specification in the EU. Sustainability. 12(8), 3070 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munda, G.: Intensity of preference and related uncertainty in non-compensatory aggregation rules. Theor. Decis. 73(4), 649–669 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munda, G., Nardo, M.: Noncompensatory/nonlinear composite indicators for ranking countries: a defensible setting. Appl. Econ. 41(12), 1513–1523 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munemo, J.: Business start-up regulations and the complementarity between foreign and domestic investment. Rev. World Econ. 150(4), 745–761 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nardo, M., Saisana, M., Saltelli, A., Tarantola, S.: Tools for composite indicators building. Europ. Com, Ispra. 15, 19–20 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD, JRC.: Handbook on constructing composite indicators: Methodology and user guide. OECD Publishing, Paris (2008)

  • Panel, I.: Independent panel review of the doing business report. World Bank. Washington (2013)

  • Parreiras, R.O., Ekel, P.Y.: Fuzzy preference based organizational performance measurement. In: Watada J., Phillips-Wren G., Jain L.C., Howlett R.J. (eds.) Intelligent Decision Technologies. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, vol 10. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22194-1_45

  • Parreiras, R.O., Ekel, P.Y., Morais, D.C.: Fuzzy set based consensus schemes for multi-criteria group decision making applied to strategic planning. Group Decis. Negot. 21(2), 153–183 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, k.: LIII. On lines and planes of closest fit to systems of points in space. Lond. Edinb. Dublin Philos. Mag. J. Sci. 2(11)  559–572 (1901). https://doi.org/10.1080/14786440109462720

  • Pedrycz, W., Ekel, P., Parreiras, R.: Fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making: models, methods and applications. John Wiley & Sons, Chinchester (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  • Pereira Júnior, J.G., Ekel, P.I., Moreno, E.V.S., Silva, I.S., Silva, C.M.C., Mascarenhas, F.H.L.: Decision making in a fuzzy environment as applied to analyzing and prioritizing industrial districts. In: Proceedings of the XLVIII SBPO Simpósio Brasileiro de Pesquisa Operacional, 292–302 (2016)

  • Pérez, I.J., Cabrerizo, F.J., Alonso, S., Herrera-Viedma, E.: A new consensus model for group decision making problems with non-homogeneous experts. IEEE Trans. Syst., Man, Cybern.: Syst. 44(4), 494–498 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinheiro-Alves, R., Zambujal-Oliveira, J.: The ease of doing business index as a tool for investment location decisions. Econ. Lett. 117(1), 66–70 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramalho, F.D., Ekel, P.Y., Pedrycz, W., Júnior, J.G.P., Soares, G.L.: Multicriteria decision making under conditions of uncertainty in application to multiobjective allocation of resources. Information Fusion. 49, 249–261 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roham, M., Gabrielyan, A.R., Archer, N.P.: Fuzzy linguistic modeling of ease of doing business indicators. Internat. J. Uncertain. Fuzziness Knowledge-Based Systems 17(04), 531–557 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roszkowska, E.: Rank ordering criteria weighting methods–a comparative overview. Optimum. Studia Ekonomiczne. 5(65), 14–33 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roy, B.: Classement et choix en présence de points de vue multiples. Revue Française D’informatique Et De Recherche Opérationnelle. 2(8), 57–75 (1968)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roy, B.: Problems and methods with multiple objective functions. Math. Program. 1(1), 239–266 (1971)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roy, B.: The outranking approach and the foundations of ELECTRE methods. In: Bana e Costa, C.A. (eds.) Readings in Multiple Criteria Decision Aid, pp. 155–183. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-75935-2_8

  • Ruiz, F., Cabello, J.M., Pérez-Gladish, B.: Building ease-of-doing-business synthetic indicators using a double reference point approach. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 131, 130–140 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saaty, T.L.: The analytic hierarchy process: planning, priority setting, resources allocation. McGraw, New York (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwab, K.: The Global Competitiveness Report 2017–2018: Global Competitiveness Index. World Economic Forum. weforum.org/gcr (2017). Accessed 01 Oct 2020

  • Silva, L.M.L., Ekel, P., Vieira, D., Soares, G.L.: Multiattribute spatial decision-making for qualitative information processing as applied to the renewable energy generating sites prospection. IEEE Access. 8, 137745–137757 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sneath, P.H.A.: Some statistical problems in numerical taxonomy. The Stat. 17(1) (1967). https://doi.org/10.2307/2987198

  • Sneath, P.H.A., Sokal, R.R.: In: Freeman, W.H. (ed.) Numerical Taxonomy: the Principles and Practice of Numerical Classification. San Francisco (EUA) (1973)

  • Sureeyatanapas, P.: Comparison of rank-based weighting methods for multi-criteria decision making. Eng. Appl. Sci. Res. 43, 376–379 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan, K.G., Amri, M., Merdikawati, N.: A new index to measure ease of doing business at the sub-national level: Empirical findings from Indonesia. Cross Cultur. Strat. Manag. 25(3), 515–537 (2018a)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan, K.G., Gopalan, S., Nguyen, W.: Measuring ease of doing business in India’s sub-national economies: a novel index. South Asian J. Bus. Stud. 7(3), 242–264 (2018b)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torriti, J., Ikpe, E.: Administrative costs of regulation and foreign direct investment: the standard cost model in non-OECD countries. Rev. World Econ. 151(1), 127–144 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Transparency International.: Corruption Perceptions Index 2017: Global Scores. http://files.transparency.org/content/download/2185/13756/file/2017_CPI_Brochure_EN.PDF (2018). Accessed 01 Oct 2020.

  • Ullah, I., Khan, M.A.: Institutional quality and foreign direct investment inflows: evidence from Asian countries. J. Econ. Stud. 44(6), 1030–1050 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vivek, M.A., Jason, A.A.: The ease of doing business rank: an assessment of its macroeconomic relevance. SSRN Elect. J. (2016). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2804921

  • Witulski, N., Dias, J.G.: The Sustainable society index: Its reliability and validity. Ecological Indicators 114, 106190 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank.: Data Bank. https://databank.worldbank.org/data/home (2017). Accessed 01 Oct 2020

  • World Bank.: Doing Business 2019: Training for Reform. World Bank Publications, Washington DC (2018)

  • Yager, R.R.: On ordered weighted averaging aggregation operators in multi-criteria decision making. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. 18(1), 183–190 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yager, R.R., Filev, D.P.: Parameterized and-uke and or-like owa operators. Int. J. Gen. Syst. 22(3), 297–316 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh, L.A.: The role of fuzzy logic in the management of uncertainty in expert systems. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 11(1–3), 199–227 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0114(83)80081-5

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to the three anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments. The remaining errors are ours.

Funding

The work of Matheus Pereira Libório was supported by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior, Brazil (CAPES), under Finance Code 001. The work of Petr Ekel was supported by the Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico, CNPq) under grant 311032/2016–8 and by Companhia Vale – Brasil (Vale)—P&D 2019–2022 “Pesquisa em Planejamento e Suporte a Tomada de Decisão” [Research in Planning and Decision Making Support].

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matheus Pereira Libório.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interests

The authors declare they have no financial interests.

Human and animals participants

No Human Participants and/or Animals are involved in this research.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bernardes, P., Ekel, P.I., Rezende, S.F.L. et al. Cost of doing business index in Latin America. Qual Quant 56, 2233–2252 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-021-01221-8

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-021-01221-8

Keywords

Navigation