Skip to main content
Log in

Digital transformation of cultural institutions: a statistical analysis of Italian and Campania GLAMs

  • Published:
Quality & Quantity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Digitalization is playing a prominent role in cultural economics reshaping GLAM organizations toward a more relevant income generation. However achieving a higher level of digitalization requires careful management and resource planning. To this end, the concept of digital maturity provides a useful description of an organization current level of digitalization, allowing for a more effective digital transformation process. The literature concerning business studies and information technology developed highly detailed surveys to assess digital maturity levels within organizations, the so-called digital maturity models. Nevertheless, while many of them are manufacturing-based, very few are wide-spectrum models allowing for a generic assessment of digital maturity. This paper provides a preliminary descriptive analysis on the aptitude of Italian and Campania GLAMs for deploying digital facilities and services, thus suggesting the need to elaborate a specific digital maturity model for GLAM organizations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. GLAM is the acronym for Galleries, Libraries, Archives and Museums.

References

  • Alfandari, A.: How digital can help museums to reach new audiences. In: Proctor, N., Cherry, R. (eds.) Museums and the Web Asia 2014. Museums and the Web, Silver Spring (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bagdadli, S.: Il museo come azienda. Management e organizzazione al servizio della cultura. ed. ETAS Libri, Bologna (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertacchini, E., Morando, F.: The future of museums in the digital age: new models for access to and use of digital collections. Int. J. Arts Manag. 15(2), 60–72 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bharadwaj, A.: A resource-based perspective on information technology capability and firm performance: an empirical investigation. MIS Q., 24(1), 169–196 (2000). https://doi.org/10.2307/3250983

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carcary, M., Doherty, E., Conway, G.: A dynamic capability approach to digital transformation: a focus on key foundational themes. In: The European Conference on Information Systems Management, Academic Conferences International Limited, vol. 20 (2016)

  • Chanias, S., Hess, T.: Understanding digital transformation strategy formation: insights from Europe’s automotive industry. In: PACIS, pp. 296 (2016)

  • Crosby, P.: Quality is Free. McGraw-Hill, New York (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  • David, P.A.: Clio and the Economics of QWERTY. Am. Econ. Rev. 75, 332–337 (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  • De Carolis, A., Macchi, M., Negri, E., and Terzi, S.: A maturity model for assessing the digital readiness of manufacturing companies. In: IFIP International Conference on Advances in Production Management Systems. Springer, Cham (2017)

  • Deming, W.E.: Out of crisis, centre for advanced engineering study. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge (1986)

  • Erol, S., Schumacher, A., Sihn, W.: Strategic guidance towards industry 4.0—a three-stage process model. In: International Conference on Competitive Manufacturing, vol. 9, pp. 495–501 (2016)

  • Kulpa, M.K., Johnson, K.A.: Interpreting the CMMI (R): A Process Improvement Approach. Auerbach Publications, Boca Raton (2003)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Guarino, M., Di Palma M.A., Gallo, M.: GLAM organizations’ digital maturity indicator: a statistical approach for Campania museums. Second International Conference on Data Science and Social Research, University of Milan “Bicocca” and University of Milan “IULM”, 2–4 February, 2019, Milan (2019)

  • Government of South Australia G., Australia K.: Digital transformation toolkit available at: https://digital.sa.gov.au/resources/topic/digital-government/digital-transformationtoolkit (2019)

  • Humphrey, W.S.: Managing the Software Process. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ippolito, J.: Accommodating the unpredictable: the variable media questionnaire. Permanence through change: the variable media approach, pp. 47–53. Guggenheim Museum Publications (2003)

  • ISTAT: Museum Report 2015. https://www.istat.it/it/files/2016/12/Report-Musei.pdf (2016)

  • Juran, J.M.: Juran on Planning for Quality. Collier MacMillan, Springfield (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kane, G.C., Palmer, D., Nguyen-Phillips, A. N., Kiron, D., Buckley, N.: Achieving Digital Maturity: Adapting your company to a changing world” MIT Sloan Management Review and Deloitte University Press (2017). https://www2.deloitte.com/insights/us/en/focus/digitalmaturity/digital-mindset-mit-smr-report.html

  • Katz, M.L., Shapiro, C.: Network externalities, competition, and compatibility. Am. Econ. Rev. 75(3), 424–440 (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, Y.C., Liew, A.W.C., Su, W.P.: The digital museum: challenges and solution. In: 2012 8th International Conference on Information Science and Digital Content Technology (ICIDT2012), IEEE, vol. 3, pp. 646–649 (2012)

  • Linacre, J.M., Wright, B.: Winsteps. (2000). http://www.winsteps.com

  • Lynch, C.: Digital collections, digital libraries & the digitization of cultural heritage information. Microform Imaging Rev. 31(4), 131–145 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Middleton, V.T.: New visions for independent museums in the UK. Association of Independent Museums, Chichester (1990)

  • Minghetti, V., Moretti, A., Micelli, S.: Reengineering the museum’s role in the tourism value chain: towards an it business model. Inf. Technol. Tour. 4(2), 131–143 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mok, M.M., Wright, B.D.: Overview of rasch model families. In Introduction to Rasch Measurement: Theory, Models and Applications, pp. 1–24 (2004)

  • Parry, R.: Recoding the museum: digital heritage and the technologies of change. Routledge, London (2007)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Peacock, D., Brownbill, J.: Audiences, visitors, users: reconceptualising users of museum online content and services. In: Museums and the Web. Citeseer, pp. 11–14 (2007)

  • Pöppelbuß, J., Röglinger, M.: What makes a useful maturity model? A framework of general design principles for maturity models and its demonstration in business process management. In: ECIS (2011)

  • Rasch, G.: Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Copenhagen, Denmark: Danmarks Paedogogiske Institut (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1980)(1960)

  • Shapiro, C., Carl, S., Varian, H.R.: Information Rules: A Strategic Guide to the Network Economy. Harvard Business Press, Brighton (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  • Simonacci, V., Gallo, M.: Statistical tools for student evaluation of academic educational quality. Qual. Quant. (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-016-0425-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soren, B.J.: Canadian heritage information network: best practices in creating quality online experiences for museum users. Museum Manag. Curatorship 20(2), 131–148 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Throsby, D., Bakhshi, H.: Culture of innovation: an economic analysis of innovation in arts and cultural organisations. NESTA Research Report (2010)

  • United Nation World Tourism Organization: Yearly report (2018). https://www.e-unwto.org/doi/pdf/10.18111/9789284419876

  • Wendler, R.: The maturity of maturity model research: a systematic mapping study. Inf. Softw. Technol. 54(12), 1317–1339 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, B.: Reliability and separation. Rasch Meas. Trans. 9(4), 472 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to Ms Violetta Simonacci for revising the original text. Comments and suggestions by anonymous reviewers have greatly improved an early version of the paper. This work has financially supported by funds of POR CAMPANIA FSE 2014IT055FOPO20.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michele Gallo.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

See Tables A.1 and A.2.

Table A.1 Classification of type and number of visitors per year of State GLAMs
Table A.2 Specification of geographical areas with regions and corresponding Provinces

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Guarino, M., Di Palma, M.A., Menini, T. et al. Digital transformation of cultural institutions: a statistical analysis of Italian and Campania GLAMs. Qual Quant 54, 1445–1464 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-019-00889-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-019-00889-3

Keywords

Navigation