Skip to main content

Women’s decision making power and child labor: evidence from Pakistan

Quality & Quantity volume 53, pages 2175–2197 (2019)Cite this article

Abstract

The quality of life of a child depends on the decision of parents about the allocation choices of their child’s time between education and work. In particular, the mother of a child can play a significant role in enhancing the quality of life of her kids given that she has the right of participation in decision making in family life. This research is based on the belief that child labor is detrimental to human capital accumulation and women’s decision-making power plays an important role in economic development by enhancing human capital of the future generation. This study contributes to the literature by addressing the question: How women take part in the decision making process and how women’s decisions influence their children. Women’s decision making power is gauged by using a set of different measures from Pakistan Social and Living Standards Measurement Survey 2013–2014, which inquires directly who in the household makes decisions on some key matters, such as women’s education and employment, uptake of fertility regulating methods, the number of children and purchase of household consumption items. Our study uses logistic regression technique to empirically test the relationship between women’s decision making power and child labor. The findings of study suggest that empowering women by increasing their ability to make decisions on some key issues of the family matters decreases the probability of child labor in Pakistan. Among all the measures of women’s decision making power, the participation of women in decisions of family size has a larger effect on child labor. Moreover, gender heterogeneity in the reduction of child labor also exists as women’s decision making power leaves different impacts on boys and girls. The results are statistically significant across various specifications. Hence, empowering women through the decision-making process of the family life can help to reduce child labor in the society.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Notes

  1. ILO Convention No. 138 allows a Member State whose economy and educational facilities are insufficiently developed to initially specify a minimum age of 14 years. National laws or regulations may permit the employment or work of children aged 13 to 15 years on light work which is (a) not likely to be harmful to their health or development; and (b) not such as to prejudice their attendance at school, their participation in vocational orientation or training programmes approved by the competent authority or their capacity to benefit from the instruction received. A Member whose economy and educational facilities are insufficiently developed may substitute the ages 13 and 15 for the ages 12 and 14 for light work.

    Further the Article 3 of this convention states that: The minimum age for admission to any type of employment or work which by its nature or the circumstances in which it is carried out is likely to jeopardize the health, safety or morals of young persons shall not be less than 18 years.

  2. Employment information of children below 10 years old is not available in PSLM Survey 2013-14.

  3. Following ILO Convention No. 189, “domestic work” means work performed in or for a household or households and “domestic worker” means any person engaged in domestic work within an employment relationship.

References

  • Baig, I.A., Batool, Z., Ali, A., Baig, S.A., Hashim, M., Zia-ur-Rehman, M.: Impact of women empowerment on rural development in Southern Punjab, Pakistan. Qual. Quant. 52(4), 1861–1872 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baland, J.M., Robinson, J.A.: Is child labor inefficient? J. Polit. Econ. 108(4), 663–679 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basu, K.: Child labor: cause, consequence, and cure, with remarks on international labor standards. J. Econ. Lit. 37(3), 1083–1119 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basu, K., Van, P.H.: The economics of child labor. Am. Econ. Rev. 88(3), 412–427 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  • Basu, K., Das, S., Dutta, B.: Child labor and household wealth: theory and empirical evidence of an inverted-U. J. Dev. Econ. 91(1), 8–14 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Behrman, J.R., Foster, A.D., Rosenweig, M.R., Vashishtha, P.: Women’s schooling, home teaching, and economic growth. J. Polit. Econ. 107(4), 682–714 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhalotra, S., Heady, C.: Child farm labor: the wealth paradox. World Bank Econ. Rev. 17(2), 197–227 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, H., Dong, X.Y., MacPhail, F.: Labor migration and time use patterns of the left-behind children and elderly in rural China. World Dev. 39(12), 2199–2210 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desai, S., Jain, D.: Maternal employment and changes in family dynamics: the social context of women’s work in rural South India. Popul. Dev. Rev. 20, 115–136 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Di Maio, M., Nandi, T.K.: The effect of the Israeli–Palestinian conflict on child labor and school attendance in the West Bank. J. Dev. Econ. 100(1), 107–116 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dinopoulos, E., Zhao, L.: Child labor and globalization. J. Labor Econ. 25(3), 553–579 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drèze, J., Murthi, M.: Fertility, education, and development: evidence from India. Popul. Dev. Rev. 27(1), 33–63 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edmonds, E., Pavcnik, N.: Child labor in the global economy. J. Econ. Perspect. 19(1), 199–220 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emerson, P.M., Souza, A.P.: Is child labor harmful? The impact of working earlier in life on adult earnings. Econ. Dev. Cult. Change 59(2), 345–385 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Francavilla, F., Giannelli, G.C.: The relation between child work and the employment of mothers in India. Int. J. Manpower 31(2), 232–257 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldin, C.: A pollution theory of discrimination: male and female differences in occupations and earnings. Am. Rec. 12(1), 313–348 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hou, X.: Women’s decision making power and human development: evidence from Pakistan. World Bank’s Policy Research Working Paper Series 5830, Washington DC: World Bank (2011)

  • Hou, X.: How does women’s decision-making power affect budget share, nutrition and education in Pakistan? J. Fam. Econ. Issues 37(1), 115–131 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HRCP.: State of human rights in 2014 (78-969-8324-77-3). Human Rights Commission of Pakistan (2014)

  • ILO.: Retrieved from global estimates of child labour: results and trends, 2012–2016 (2017)

  • Impicciatore, R., Dalla Zuanna, G.: The impact of education on fertility in Italy. Changes across cohorts and south–north differences. Qual. Quant. 51(5), 2293–2317 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kazi, Shahnaz: Gender inequalities and development in Pakistan. In: Khan, S.R. (ed.) Fifty years of Pakistan’s development. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan, R.E.A., Raza, M.A.: Child malnutrition in developing economies: a case study of Bangladesh. Qual. Quant. 48(3), 1389–1408 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J., Zepeda, L.: Factors affecting children’s participation and amount of labor on family farms. J. Saf. Res. 35(4), 391–401 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, B.C., Jenkins, L.S., Westaby, J.D.: Factors influencing exposure of children to major hazards on family farms. J. Rural Health 13(3), 206–215 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Majeed, M.T., Malik, A.: Selling souls: an empirical analysis of human trafficking and globalization. Pak. J. Commer. Soc. Sci. 11(1), 353–388 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  • Patrinos, H.A., Psacharopoulos, G.: Family size, schooling and child labor in Peru: an empirical analysis. J. Popul. Econ. 10(4), 387–405 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • PSLM.: Pakistan Social and Living Standards Measurement Survey 2013–2014. Pakistan Bureau of Statistics (2014)

  • Rad, E.H., Gholampoor, H., Jaafaripooyan, E.: Child labor and the influencing factors: evidence from less developed provinces of Iran. Iran. J. Public Health 44(9), 1244 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ranjan, P.: An economic analysis of child labor. Econ. Lett. 64(1), 99–105 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reggio, I.: The influence of the mother’s power on her child’s labor in Mexico. J. Dev. Econ. 96(1), 95–105 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riaz, S., Pervaiz, Z.: The impact of women’s education and employment on their empowerment: an empirical evidence from household level survey. Qual. Quant. 52(6), 2855–2870 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shahnaz, L., Kizilbash, Z.: Commenting on the causal factors controlling female decision making” a study of female decision making regarding paid employment: Punjab, Pakistan. Lahore J. Econ. 7(1), 75–88 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shuai, Y., Shuai, C.M., Li, W.J., Huang, F.B.: Role of women’s empowerment in improving farmer’s livelihood: empirical evidence from China. Qual. Quant. 53(2), 621–639 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U.N.: Development Program World Bank. World Development Report: The Challenge of Development. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 1991 (1996)

  • UN.: Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Retrieved from https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/post2015/transformingourworld (2015)

  • Vásquez, W.F., Bohara, A.K.: Household shocks, child labor, and child schooling: evidence from Guatemala. Latin Am. Res. Rev. 45(3), 165–186 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  • Webbink, E., Smits, J., De Jong, E.: Hidden child labor: determinants of housework and family business work of children in 16 developing countries. World Dev. 40(3), 631–642 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zapata, D., Contreras, D., Kruger, D.: Child labor and schooling in Bolivia: who’s falling behind? The roles of domestic work, gender, and ethnicity. World Dev. 39(4), 588–599 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Economics, Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad, Pakistan

    Muhammad Tariq Majeed & Faiza Kiran

Authors
  1. Muhammad Tariq Majeed
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Faiza Kiran
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Muhammad Tariq Majeed.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

It is to state that “we do not have any conflict of interest and this research is not sponsored by any organization”.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

See Tables 7, 8 and 9.

Table 7 Effects of an index of women’s decision making power on child labor
Full size table
Table 8 Descriptive statistics
Full size table
Table 9 Correlation matrix
Full size table

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Majeed, M.T., Kiran, F. Women’s decision making power and child labor: evidence from Pakistan. Qual Quant 53, 2175–2197 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-019-00864-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-019-00864-y

Keywords

  • Women’s decision making power
  • Child labor
  • Human development