Advertisement

Quality & Quantity

, Volume 52, Issue 3, pp 1409–1422 | Cite as

What determines the financial performance of microfinance institutions in Bangladesh? a panel data analysis

  • Shamima Nasrin
  • Rajah Rasiah
  • Angathevar Baskaran
  • Muhammad Mehedi Masud
Article
  • 195 Downloads

Abstract

While there is considerable expansion of microfinance institutions (MFIs) in the developing countries, there is a paucity of literature that examines the determinants of their Financial Performance (FP) among the Least Developed Countries (LDCs). This article seeks to investigate the determinants of FP of MFIs in Bangladesh over the period 2007–2013. Using two different measures of financial performance (portfolio yield and profit margin), the results indicate that the depth and breadth of social outreach can improve FP of MFIs. In particular, targeting women borrowers, increasing the average loan per borrower and increasing the number of active borrowers can contribute significantly to enhance the FP of MFIs. The results also show that, increasing savings and reducing operating expense can also contribute to increase MFIs’s financial performance.

Keywords

Microfinance institutions Social outreach Women borrowers Financial performance Bangladesh 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the editor and two anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments and invaluable suggestions. The first author especially thanks Mr. Mesbah Uddin for his suggestions. The first author also would like to thank University of Malaya for funding her doctoral studies through Bright Spark Program.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

Authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Abate, G.T., Borzaga, C., Getnet, K.: Cost-efficiency and outreach of microfinance institutions: trade-offs and the role of ownership. J. Int. Dev. 26(6), 923–932 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abdullah, S., Quayes, S.: Do women borrowers augment financial performance of MFIs? Appl. Econ. 48(57), 5593–5604 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Armendáriz, B., Morduch, J.: The economics of microfinance. MIT press, Cambridge (2010)Google Scholar
  4. Awaworyi, S.K., Marr, A.: Sustainability and outreach: a comparative study of MFIs in South Asia and Latin America & the Caribbean. Working Paper Series, 13, 14. Department of Economics, Monash University (2014)Google Scholar
  5. Barry, T.A., Tacneng, R.: The impact of governance and institutional quality on MFI outreach and financial performance in Sub-Saharan Africa. World Dev. 58, 1–20 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ben Soltane, B.: Social and financial performance of microfinance institutions: is there a trade-off? J. Econ. Int. Finance 4(4), 92–100 (2012)Google Scholar
  7. Bhatt, N., Tang, S.-Y.: Making microcredit work in the United States: social, financial, and administrative dimensions. Econ. Dev. Q. 15(3), 229–241 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Conning, J.: Outreach, sustainability and leverage in monitored and peer-monitored lending. J. Dev. Econ. 60(1), 51–77 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cull, R., Morduch, J.: Financial performance and outreach: a global analysis of leading microbanks. Econ. J. 117(517), 107–133 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. De Bandt, O., Davis, E.P.: Competition, contestability and market structure in European banking sectors on the eve of EMU. J. Bank. Finance 24(6), 1045–1066 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Driscoll, J.C., Kraay, A.C.: Consistent covariance matrix estimation with spatially dependent panel data. Rev. Econ. Stat. 80(4), 549–560 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gutierrez-Nieto, B., Serrano-Cinca, C., Molinero, C.M.: Microfinance institutions and efficiency. Omega 35(2), 131–142 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hashemi, S., Rosenberg, R.: Graduating the poorest into microfinance: linking safety nets and financial services. Focus note. Consultative group to assist the poor. No. 34. (2006)Google Scholar
  14. Hoechle, D.: Robust standard errors for panel regressions with cross-sectional dependence. Stata J. 7(3), 1–31 (2007)Google Scholar
  15. Hoepner, A.G., Liu, H., Spaggiari, L.: The outreach measurement debate in microfinance: does average loan size relate to client poverty? (2011). https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1956569. Accessed 26 July 2016
  16. Hossain, M.: Credit for alleviation of rural poverty: the grameen bank in Bangladesh, vol. 65. International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington (1988)Google Scholar
  17. Hulme, D., Mosley, P.: Finance Against Poverty, vol. 2. Psychology Press, Hove (1996)Google Scholar
  18. Imai, K.S., Gaiha, R., Thapa, G., Annim, S.K., Gupta, A.: Performance of Microfinance Institutions: A Macroeconomic and Institutional Perspective. Research Institute for Economics and Business Administration Kobe University, Nada Kobe Japan (2011)Google Scholar
  19. Janda, K., Svárovská, B.: Suitability of microfinance as an investment option. Centre for economic research and graduate education. Working Paper. No 47. pp. 1–52. Charles University, Czech Republic (2012)Google Scholar
  20. Janda, K., Svárovská, B., Turbat, B.: Determinants of the financial performance of microfinance institutions in Central Asia. Post Communist Econ. 25(4), 557–568 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kai, H.: Competition and Wide Outreach of Microfinance Institutions. Munich Personal RePEc Archive, Munich (2009)Google Scholar
  22. Kennedy, P.: A Guide to Econometrics, 6th edn. Wiley-Blackwell, New Jersey (2008)Google Scholar
  23. Khan, H.T., Rahman, M.T.: Women’s participations in economic and NGO activities in Bangladesh: an empirical study on the Bangladesh demographic and health survey (BDHS). Int. J. Sociol. Soc. Policy 36(7/8), 491–515 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kurgat, P.: The role of savings in microfinance institutions: does it foster institutions financial performance& outreach: acase of kenya women finance trust. Masters’ Thesis, Solvay Brussels School of Economics and Management (2011)Google Scholar
  25. Maes, J.P., Reed, L.R.: State of the Microcredit Summit Campaign Report 2012. Microcredit Summit Campaign, Washington (2012)Google Scholar
  26. Makame, A., Murinde, V.: Empirical Findings on Cognitive Dissonance Around Microfinance Outreach and Sustainability. University of Birmingham, Birmingham (2006). (unpublished paper) Google Scholar
  27. Mersland, R., Strøm, R.Ø.: Performance and trade-offs in microfinance organisations—does ownership matter? J. Int. Dev. 20(5), 598–612 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mia, M.A.: Does lending to women affect the revenue generation of microfinance institutions (MFIs)? Empir. Econ. Quant. Econ. Lett. 3(4), 59–65 (2014)Google Scholar
  29. Mia, M.A., Chandran, V.: Measuring financial and social outreach productivity of microfinance institutions in Bangladesh. Soc. Indic. Res. 127(2), 505–527 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Microcredit Regulatory Authority: NGO-MFIs in Bangladesh: A Statistical Publication. Microcredit Regulatory Authority, Dhaka (2015)Google Scholar
  31. Miyashita, Y.: Microfinance and poverty alleviation: lessons from Indonesia’s village banking system. Pac. Rim L. Pol’y J. 10, 147 (2000)Google Scholar
  32. Nasrin, S., Baskaran, A., Rasiah, R.: Microfinance and savings among the poor: evidence from Bangladesh microfinance sector. Qual. Quant. 51(4), 1435–1448 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Paxton, J.: A poverty outreach index and its application to microfinance. Econ. Bull. 9(2), 1–10 (2003)Google Scholar
  34. Quayes, S.: Depth of outreach and financial sustainability of microfinance institutions. Appl. Econ. 44(26), 3421–3433 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Quayes, S.: Outreach and performance of microfinance institutions: a panel analysis. Appl. Econ. 47(18), 1909–1925 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Quayes, S., Hasan, T.: Financial disclosure and performance of microfinance institutions. J. Account. Organ. Change 10(3), 314–337 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Rahman, M.T., Khan, H.T.: The effectiveness of the microcredit programme in Bangladesh. Local Econ. 28(1), 85–98 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Schmidheiny, K.: Panel Data: Fixed and Random Effects: Short Guides to Microeconometrics. Unversität Basel, http://www.schmidheiny.name/teaching/panel2up.pdf (2011)
  39. Schreiner, M.: Aspects of outreach: a framework for discussion of the social benefits of microfinance. J. Int. Dev. 14(5), 591–603 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sharma, M., Zeller, M.: Repayment performance in group-based credit programs in Bangladesh: an empirical analysis. World Dev. 25(10), 1731–1742 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Staikouras, C., Mamatzakis, E., Koutsomanoli-Filippaki, A.: An empirical investigation of operating performance in the new European banking landscape. Glob. Finance J. 19(1), 32–45 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wooldridge, J.M.: Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. MIT Press, Cambridge (2002)Google Scholar
  43. Wooldridge, J.M.: Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. MIT press, Cambridge (2010)Google Scholar
  44. World Bank.: World Development Indicators. In World Bank (ed.), WDI. Washington (2017)Google Scholar
  45. Zeller, M.: Determinants of repayment performance in credit groups: the role of program design, intragroup risk pooling, and social cohesion. Econ. Dev. Cult. Change 46(3), 599–620 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shamima Nasrin
    • 1
  • Rajah Rasiah
    • 1
  • Angathevar Baskaran
    • 1
  • Muhammad Mehedi Masud
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Development Studies, Faculty of Economics and AdministrationUniversity of MalayaKuala LumpurMalaysia

Personalised recommendations