Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Identifying the key barriers and their interrelationships impeding the university technology transfer in Taiwan: a multi-stakeholder perspective

  • Published:
Quality & Quantity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In recent decades, universities have been designated the role of generating and disseminating knowledge in an innovation system. Nevertheless, a multitude of barriers exist in the university technology transfer process. Moreover, a limited number of studies have noted that these barriers not only impede university technology transfer but also affect one another. Therefore, this study examines the inter-relationships among these barriers and identifies the key barriers by comparing different perspectives of key stakeholders with the decision making trial and evaluation laboratory method. With Taiwan as the research base, the key stakeholders in this study are university scientists, university technology transfer offices and entrepreneurs. The results indicate that the lack of mutual understanding regarding expectations and working practices is the most prominent barrier, while the rules and regulations imposed by universities or government funding agencies are the barriers with the highest influence on others. Furthermore, policy implications for Taiwan’s university technology transfer are provided.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, T.R., Daim, T.U., Lavoie, F.F.: Measuring the efficiency of university technology transfer. Technovation 27, 306–318 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, T., Pashby, I., Gibbons, A.: Effective university-industry interaction: a multi-case evaluation of collaborative R&D projects. Eur. Manag. J. 20, 272–285 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belkhodja, O., Landry, R.: The triple-helix collaboration: why do researchers collaborate with industry and the government? What are the factors that influence the perceived barriers? Scientometrics 70, 301–332 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boehm, D.N., Hogan, T.: ‘A jack of all trades’: the role of PIs in the establishment and management of collaborative networks in scientific knowledge commercialization. J. Technol. Transf. 39, 134–149 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brimble, P., Doner, R.F.: University-industry linkages and economic development: the case of Thailand. World Dev. 35, 1021–1036 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruneel, J., D’Este, P., Salter, A.: Investigating the factors that diminish the barriers to university-industry collaboration. Res. Policy 39, 858–868 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, Y.C., Yang, P.Y., Chen, M.H.: Then determinants of academic research commercial performance: towards an organizational ambidexterity perspective. Res. Policy 38, 936–946 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapple, W., Lockett, A., Siegel, D., Wright, M.: Assessing the relative performance of U.K. university technology transfer offices: parametric and non-parametric evidence. Res. Policy 34, 369–384 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiang, H.C.: The impact of national innovation system on the development of university technology transfer-comparison among U.S.A., Japan and Taiwan. Sun Yat-Sen Manag. Rev. 17, 971–1000 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarysse, B., Tartari, V., Salter, A.: The impact of entrepreneurial capacity, experience and organizational support on academic entrepreneurship. Res. Policy 40, 1084–1093 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Debackere, K., Veugelers, R.: The role of academic technology transfer organizations in improving industry science links. Res. Policy 34, 321–342 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Di Gregorio, D., Shane, S.: Why do some universities generate more startups than others? Res. Policy 32, 209–227 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dosi, G., Llerena, P., SylosLabini, M.: The relationship between science, technologies and their industrial exploitation: an illustration through the myths and realities of the so-called ‘European Paradox’. Res. Policy 35, 1450–1464 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dou, Y., Sarkis, J.: A multiple stakeholder perspective on barriers to implementing China RoHS regulations. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 81, 92–104 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Etzkowitz, H., Leydesdorff, L.: The triple helix—university-industry-government relations: a laboratory for knowledge-based economic development. EASST Rev. 14, 14–19 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  • Etzkowitz, H., Leydesdorff, L.: The dynamics of innovation: from national systems and "Mode 2" to a triple helix of university-industry-government relations. Res. Policy 29, 109–123 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Florida, R., Kenney, M.: Venture capital-financed innovation and technological change in USA. Res. Policy 17, 119–137 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foltz, J., Barham, B., Kim, K.: Universities and agricultural biotechnology patent production. Agribusiness 16, 82–95 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fontela, E., Gabus, A.: The DEMATEL Observer, DEMATEL 1976 Report. Battelle Geneva Research Centre, Geneva (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, J., Silberman, J.: University technology transfer: do incentives, management, and location matter? J. Technol. Transf. 28, 17–30 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gabus, A., Fontela, E. Perceptions of the World Problematique: Communication Procedure, Communicating with Those Bearing Collective Responsibility (DEMATEL Report No. 1). Battelle Geneva Research Centre, Geneva (1973)

  • Galán-Muros, V., Plewa, C.: What drives and inhibits university-business cooperation in Europe? A comprehensive assessment. R&D Manag. 46, 369–382 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilsing, V., Bekkers, R., Bodas Freitas, I.M., van der Steen, M.: Differences in technology transfer between science-based and development-based industries: transfer mechanisms and barriers. Technovation 31, 638–647 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horowitz Gassol, J.: The effect of university culture and stakeholders’ perceptions on university-business linking activities. J. Technol. Transf. 32, 489–507 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsu, D.W.L., Shen, Y.C., Yuang, B.J.C., Chou, C.J.: Toward successful commercialization of university technology: performance drivers of university technology transfer in Taiwan. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 92, 25–39 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsu, S.L., Wu, C.T.: Impacts of “Science and Technology Basic Act” on national universities in Taiwan. Technol. Law Rev. 9(1), 151–204 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu, M.C., Hung, S.C., Lo, H.C., Tseng, Y.C.: Determinants of university-industry research collaborations in Taiwan: the case of the National Tsing Hua University. Res. Eval. 25, 121–135 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, C.Y., Shyu, J.Z., Tzeng, G.H.: Reconfiguring the innovation policy portfolios for Taiwan’s SIP Mall industry. Technovation 27, 744–765 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, N., Butterill, D., Goering, P.: Organizational factors that influence university-based researchers’ engagement in knowledge transfer activities. Sci. Commun. 25, 246–259 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, R., Thursby, M.: Proofs and prototypes for sale: the licensing of university inventions. Am. Econ. Rev. 91, 240–259 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones-Evans, D., Klofsten, M., Andersson, E., Pandya, D.: Creating a bridge between university and industry in small European countries: the role of the Industrial Liasion Office. R&D Manag. 29, 47–56 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann, A., Tödtling, F.: Science-industry interaction in the process of innovation: the importance of boundary-crossing between systems. Res. Policy 30, 791–804 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ken, Y., Chang, Y.H., Chen, Y.S., Weng, S.Y.: The overall investigation of the development of academic institutions’ technology transfers in Taiwan. Commer. Manag. Q. 10, 625–646 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lach, S., Schankerman, M.: Royalty sharing and technology licensing in universities. J. Eur. Econ. Assoc. 2, 252–264 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, C.L., Tzeng, G.H.: A value-created system of science (technology) park by using DEMATEL. Expert Syst. Appl. 36, 9683–9697 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Link, A.N., Siegel, D.S.: Generating science-based growth: an econometric analysis of the impact of organizational incentives on university-industry technology transfer. Eur. J. Financ. 11, 169–182 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liou, J.J.H., Yen, L., Tzeng, G.H.: Building an effective safety management system for airlines. J. Air Transp. Manag. 14, 20–26 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathews, J.A., Hu, M.C.: Enhancing the role of universities in building national innovative capacity in Asia: the case of Taiwan. World Dev. 35, 1005–1020 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNichols, D.: Optimal knowledge transfer methods: a generation X perspective. J. Knowl. Manag. 14, 24–37 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R.K.: Priorities in scientific discovery: a chapter in the sociology of science. Am. Sociol. Rev. 22, 635–639 (1957)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R. K.: The normative structure of science, in R. K. Merton The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1973)

  • Metcalfe, J.S.: Technology systems and technology policy in an evolutionary framework. Cambr. J. Econ. 19, 25–46 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer-Krahmer, F., Schmoch, U.: Science-based technologies: university-industry interactions in four fields. Res. Policy 27, 835–851 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, K., McAdam, M., McAdam, R.: The changing university business model: a stakeholder perspective. R&D Manag. 44, 265–287 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Min, J.W., Kim, Y.J.: What affects corporate commercialization of public technology transfer in Korea? Asian J. Technol. Innov. 22, 302–318 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mosey, S., Lockett, A., Westhead, P.: Creating network bridges for university technology transfer: the Medici fellowship programme. Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag. 18, 71–91 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muscio, A., Pozzali, A.: The effects of cognitive distance in university-industry collaborations: some evidence from Italian universities. J. Technol. Transf. 37, 1–23 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muscio, A., Vallanti, G.: Perceived obstacles to university-industry collaboration: results from a qualitative survey of Italian academic departments. Ind. Innov. 21, 410–429 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Science Council: National Science Council Review (2011). National Science Council, Taipei (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  • National Science Council: National Science Council Review (2013). National Science Council, Taipei (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Shea, R.P., Allen, T.J., Mores, K.P., O’Gorman, C., Roche, F.: Delineating the anatomy of an entrepreneurial university: the Massachusetts Institute of Technology experience. R&D Manag. 37, 1–16 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Shea, R., Allen, T., Chevalier, A.: Entrepreneurial orientation, technology transfer, and spin-off performance of US universities. Res. Policy 34, 994–1009 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Owen-Smith, J., Powell, W.W.: To patent or not: faculty decisions and institutional success at technology transfer. J. Technol. Transf. 26, 99–114 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plewa, C., Quester, P., Baaken, T.: Relationship marketing and university-industry linkages: a conceptual framework. Mark. Theory 5, 431–454 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plewa, C.: Key Drivers of University-Industry Relationships—And the Impact of Organizational Culture Difference. VDM Verlage Dr. Müller, Saarbrücken (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, E.M., Yin, Y., Hoffmann, J.: Assessing the effectiveness of technology transfer offices at U.S. research universities. J. Assoc. Univ Technol. Manag. 12, 47–80 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sá, C.M., Li, S.X., Faubert, B.: Faculties of education and institutional strategies for knowledge mobilization: an exploratory study. High. Educ. 61, 501–512 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seyed-Hosseini, S.M., Safaei, N., Asgharpour, M.J.: Reprioritization of failures in a system failure mode and effects analysis by decision making trial and evaluation laboratory technique. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 91, 872–881 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shao, J., Taisch, M., Ortega-Mier, M.: A grey-DEcision-MAking Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (DEMATEL) analysis on the barriers between environmentally friendly products and consumers: practitioners’ viewpoints on the European automobile industry. J. Clean. Prod. 112, 3185–3194 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, D.S., Veugelers, R., Wright, M.: Technology transfer offices and commercialization of university intellectual property: performance and policy implications. Oxf. Rev. Econ. Policy 23, 640–660 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, D.S., Waldman, D.A., Atwater, L.E., Link, A.N.: Toward a model of the effective transfer of scientific knowledge from academicians to practitioners: qualitative evidence from the commercialization of university technologies. J. Eng. Technol. Manag. 21, 115–142 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, D.S., Waldman, D., Link, A.: Assessing the impact of organizational practices on the relative productivity of university technology transfer offices: an exploratory study. Res. Policy 32, 27–48 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siguaw, J.A., Bakes, T.L., Simpson, P.M.: Preliminary evidence on the composition of relational exchange and its outcomes: the distributor perspective. J. Bus. Res. 56, 311–322 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Small and Medium Enterprise Administration of Ministry of Economic Affairs: The Definition, Purposes, Functions and Services of Incubation Centers. Small and Medium Enterprise Administration of Ministry of Economic Affairs. http://incubator.moeasmea.gov.tw/incubator-service-2.html (2012). Accessed 1 Jan 2016

  • Styhre, A., Lind, F.: The softening bureaucracy: accommodating new research opportunities in the entrepreneurial university. Scand. J. Manag. 26, 107–120 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tartari, V., Salter, A., D’Este, P.: Crossing the Rubicon: exploring the factors that shape academics’ perceptions of the barriers to working with industry. Cambr. J. Econ. 36, 655–677 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thursby, J.G., Kemp, S.: Growth and productive efficiency of university intellectual property licensing. Res. Policy 31, 109–124 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsai, M.C., Tsai, T.C.: The myth and loss of university technology licensing and business incubator. NCCU Intellect. Prop. Rev. 5, 81–98 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  • Tzeng, G.H., Chiang, C.H., Li, C.W.: Evaluating interwind effects in e-learning programs: a novel hybrid MCDM model based on factor analysis and DEMATEL. Expert Syst. Appl. 32, 1028–1044 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van der Sijde, P.C.: Profiting from knowledge circulation: the gains from university-industry interaction. Ind. High. Educ. 26, 15–19 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Z., Mathiyazhagan, K., Xu, L., Diabat, A.: A decision making trial and evaluation laboratory approach to analyse the barriers to Green Supply Chain Management adoption in a food packaging company. J. Clean. Prod. 117, 19–28 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, H.Y.: Constructing a strategy map for banking institutions with key performance indicators of the balanced scorecard. Eval. Program Plan. 35, 303–320 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, W.W.: Choosing knowledge management strategies by using a combined ANP and DEMATEL approach. Expert Syst. Appl. 35, 828–835 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xia, X., Govindan, K., Zhu, Q.: Analysing internal barriers for automotive parts remanufacturers in China using grey-DEMATEL approach. J. Clean. Prod. 87, 811–825 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, Q., Sarkis, J., Geng, Y.: Barriers to environmentally-friendly clothing production among Chinese apparel companies. Asian. Bus. Manag. 10, 425–452 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, Q., Sarkis, J., Lai, K.H.: Reprint of “supply chain-based barriers for truck-engine remanufacturing in China”. Transp. Res. Part E 74, 94–108 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan (Grant No. 104-2410-H-415-041). The insightful comments from the reviewers are gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yung-Chi Shen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shen, YC. Identifying the key barriers and their interrelationships impeding the university technology transfer in Taiwan: a multi-stakeholder perspective. Qual Quant 51, 2865–2884 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-016-0450-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-016-0450-y

Keywords

Navigation