Abstract
In recent decades, universities have been designated the role of generating and disseminating knowledge in an innovation system. Nevertheless, a multitude of barriers exist in the university technology transfer process. Moreover, a limited number of studies have noted that these barriers not only impede university technology transfer but also affect one another. Therefore, this study examines the inter-relationships among these barriers and identifies the key barriers by comparing different perspectives of key stakeholders with the decision making trial and evaluation laboratory method. With Taiwan as the research base, the key stakeholders in this study are university scientists, university technology transfer offices and entrepreneurs. The results indicate that the lack of mutual understanding regarding expectations and working practices is the most prominent barrier, while the rules and regulations imposed by universities or government funding agencies are the barriers with the highest influence on others. Furthermore, policy implications for Taiwan’s university technology transfer are provided.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson, T.R., Daim, T.U., Lavoie, F.F.: Measuring the efficiency of university technology transfer. Technovation 27, 306–318 (2007)
Barnes, T., Pashby, I., Gibbons, A.: Effective university-industry interaction: a multi-case evaluation of collaborative R&D projects. Eur. Manag. J. 20, 272–285 (2002)
Belkhodja, O., Landry, R.: The triple-helix collaboration: why do researchers collaborate with industry and the government? What are the factors that influence the perceived barriers? Scientometrics 70, 301–332 (2007)
Boehm, D.N., Hogan, T.: ‘A jack of all trades’: the role of PIs in the establishment and management of collaborative networks in scientific knowledge commercialization. J. Technol. Transf. 39, 134–149 (2014)
Brimble, P., Doner, R.F.: University-industry linkages and economic development: the case of Thailand. World Dev. 35, 1021–1036 (2007)
Bruneel, J., D’Este, P., Salter, A.: Investigating the factors that diminish the barriers to university-industry collaboration. Res. Policy 39, 858–868 (2010)
Chang, Y.C., Yang, P.Y., Chen, M.H.: Then determinants of academic research commercial performance: towards an organizational ambidexterity perspective. Res. Policy 38, 936–946 (2006)
Chapple, W., Lockett, A., Siegel, D., Wright, M.: Assessing the relative performance of U.K. university technology transfer offices: parametric and non-parametric evidence. Res. Policy 34, 369–384 (2005)
Chiang, H.C.: The impact of national innovation system on the development of university technology transfer-comparison among U.S.A., Japan and Taiwan. Sun Yat-Sen Manag. Rev. 17, 971–1000 (2009)
Clarysse, B., Tartari, V., Salter, A.: The impact of entrepreneurial capacity, experience and organizational support on academic entrepreneurship. Res. Policy 40, 1084–1093 (2011)
Debackere, K., Veugelers, R.: The role of academic technology transfer organizations in improving industry science links. Res. Policy 34, 321–342 (2005)
Di Gregorio, D., Shane, S.: Why do some universities generate more startups than others? Res. Policy 32, 209–227 (2003)
Dosi, G., Llerena, P., SylosLabini, M.: The relationship between science, technologies and their industrial exploitation: an illustration through the myths and realities of the so-called ‘European Paradox’. Res. Policy 35, 1450–1464 (2006)
Dou, Y., Sarkis, J.: A multiple stakeholder perspective on barriers to implementing China RoHS regulations. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 81, 92–104 (2013)
Etzkowitz, H., Leydesdorff, L.: The triple helix—university-industry-government relations: a laboratory for knowledge-based economic development. EASST Rev. 14, 14–19 (1995)
Etzkowitz, H., Leydesdorff, L.: The dynamics of innovation: from national systems and "Mode 2" to a triple helix of university-industry-government relations. Res. Policy 29, 109–123 (2000)
Florida, R., Kenney, M.: Venture capital-financed innovation and technological change in USA. Res. Policy 17, 119–137 (1988)
Foltz, J., Barham, B., Kim, K.: Universities and agricultural biotechnology patent production. Agribusiness 16, 82–95 (2000)
Fontela, E., Gabus, A.: The DEMATEL Observer, DEMATEL 1976 Report. Battelle Geneva Research Centre, Geneva (1976)
Friedman, J., Silberman, J.: University technology transfer: do incentives, management, and location matter? J. Technol. Transf. 28, 17–30 (2003)
Gabus, A., Fontela, E. Perceptions of the World Problematique: Communication Procedure, Communicating with Those Bearing Collective Responsibility (DEMATEL Report No. 1). Battelle Geneva Research Centre, Geneva (1973)
Galán-Muros, V., Plewa, C.: What drives and inhibits university-business cooperation in Europe? A comprehensive assessment. R&D Manag. 46, 369–382 (2016)
Gilsing, V., Bekkers, R., Bodas Freitas, I.M., van der Steen, M.: Differences in technology transfer between science-based and development-based industries: transfer mechanisms and barriers. Technovation 31, 638–647 (2011)
Horowitz Gassol, J.: The effect of university culture and stakeholders’ perceptions on university-business linking activities. J. Technol. Transf. 32, 489–507 (2007)
Hsu, D.W.L., Shen, Y.C., Yuang, B.J.C., Chou, C.J.: Toward successful commercialization of university technology: performance drivers of university technology transfer in Taiwan. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 92, 25–39 (2015)
Hsu, S.L., Wu, C.T.: Impacts of “Science and Technology Basic Act” on national universities in Taiwan. Technol. Law Rev. 9(1), 151–204 (2012)
Hu, M.C., Hung, S.C., Lo, H.C., Tseng, Y.C.: Determinants of university-industry research collaborations in Taiwan: the case of the National Tsing Hua University. Res. Eval. 25, 121–135 (2016)
Huang, C.Y., Shyu, J.Z., Tzeng, G.H.: Reconfiguring the innovation policy portfolios for Taiwan’s SIP Mall industry. Technovation 27, 744–765 (2007)
Jacobson, N., Butterill, D., Goering, P.: Organizational factors that influence university-based researchers’ engagement in knowledge transfer activities. Sci. Commun. 25, 246–259 (2004)
Jensen, R., Thursby, M.: Proofs and prototypes for sale: the licensing of university inventions. Am. Econ. Rev. 91, 240–259 (2001)
Jones-Evans, D., Klofsten, M., Andersson, E., Pandya, D.: Creating a bridge between university and industry in small European countries: the role of the Industrial Liasion Office. R&D Manag. 29, 47–56 (1999)
Kaufmann, A., Tödtling, F.: Science-industry interaction in the process of innovation: the importance of boundary-crossing between systems. Res. Policy 30, 791–804 (2001)
Ken, Y., Chang, Y.H., Chen, Y.S., Weng, S.Y.: The overall investigation of the development of academic institutions’ technology transfers in Taiwan. Commer. Manag. Q. 10, 625–646 (2009)
Lach, S., Schankerman, M.: Royalty sharing and technology licensing in universities. J. Eur. Econ. Assoc. 2, 252–264 (2004)
Lin, C.L., Tzeng, G.H.: A value-created system of science (technology) park by using DEMATEL. Expert Syst. Appl. 36, 9683–9697 (2009)
Link, A.N., Siegel, D.S.: Generating science-based growth: an econometric analysis of the impact of organizational incentives on university-industry technology transfer. Eur. J. Financ. 11, 169–182 (2005)
Liou, J.J.H., Yen, L., Tzeng, G.H.: Building an effective safety management system for airlines. J. Air Transp. Manag. 14, 20–26 (2008)
Mathews, J.A., Hu, M.C.: Enhancing the role of universities in building national innovative capacity in Asia: the case of Taiwan. World Dev. 35, 1005–1020 (2007)
McNichols, D.: Optimal knowledge transfer methods: a generation X perspective. J. Knowl. Manag. 14, 24–37 (2010)
Merton, R.K.: Priorities in scientific discovery: a chapter in the sociology of science. Am. Sociol. Rev. 22, 635–639 (1957)
Merton, R. K.: The normative structure of science, in R. K. Merton The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1973)
Metcalfe, J.S.: Technology systems and technology policy in an evolutionary framework. Cambr. J. Econ. 19, 25–46 (1995)
Meyer-Krahmer, F., Schmoch, U.: Science-based technologies: university-industry interactions in four fields. Res. Policy 27, 835–851 (1998)
Miller, K., McAdam, M., McAdam, R.: The changing university business model: a stakeholder perspective. R&D Manag. 44, 265–287 (2014)
Min, J.W., Kim, Y.J.: What affects corporate commercialization of public technology transfer in Korea? Asian J. Technol. Innov. 22, 302–318 (2014)
Mosey, S., Lockett, A., Westhead, P.: Creating network bridges for university technology transfer: the Medici fellowship programme. Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag. 18, 71–91 (2006)
Muscio, A., Pozzali, A.: The effects of cognitive distance in university-industry collaborations: some evidence from Italian universities. J. Technol. Transf. 37, 1–23 (2012)
Muscio, A., Vallanti, G.: Perceived obstacles to university-industry collaboration: results from a qualitative survey of Italian academic departments. Ind. Innov. 21, 410–429 (2014)
National Science Council: National Science Council Review (2011). National Science Council, Taipei (2012)
National Science Council: National Science Council Review (2013). National Science Council, Taipei (2014)
O’Shea, R.P., Allen, T.J., Mores, K.P., O’Gorman, C., Roche, F.: Delineating the anatomy of an entrepreneurial university: the Massachusetts Institute of Technology experience. R&D Manag. 37, 1–16 (2007)
O’Shea, R., Allen, T., Chevalier, A.: Entrepreneurial orientation, technology transfer, and spin-off performance of US universities. Res. Policy 34, 994–1009 (2005)
Owen-Smith, J., Powell, W.W.: To patent or not: faculty decisions and institutional success at technology transfer. J. Technol. Transf. 26, 99–114 (2001)
Plewa, C., Quester, P., Baaken, T.: Relationship marketing and university-industry linkages: a conceptual framework. Mark. Theory 5, 431–454 (2005)
Plewa, C.: Key Drivers of University-Industry Relationships—And the Impact of Organizational Culture Difference. VDM Verlage Dr. Müller, Saarbrücken (2010)
Rogers, E.M., Yin, Y., Hoffmann, J.: Assessing the effectiveness of technology transfer offices at U.S. research universities. J. Assoc. Univ Technol. Manag. 12, 47–80 (2000)
Sá, C.M., Li, S.X., Faubert, B.: Faculties of education and institutional strategies for knowledge mobilization: an exploratory study. High. Educ. 61, 501–512 (2011)
Seyed-Hosseini, S.M., Safaei, N., Asgharpour, M.J.: Reprioritization of failures in a system failure mode and effects analysis by decision making trial and evaluation laboratory technique. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 91, 872–881 (2006)
Shao, J., Taisch, M., Ortega-Mier, M.: A grey-DEcision-MAking Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (DEMATEL) analysis on the barriers between environmentally friendly products and consumers: practitioners’ viewpoints on the European automobile industry. J. Clean. Prod. 112, 3185–3194 (2016)
Siegel, D.S., Veugelers, R., Wright, M.: Technology transfer offices and commercialization of university intellectual property: performance and policy implications. Oxf. Rev. Econ. Policy 23, 640–660 (2007)
Siegel, D.S., Waldman, D.A., Atwater, L.E., Link, A.N.: Toward a model of the effective transfer of scientific knowledge from academicians to practitioners: qualitative evidence from the commercialization of university technologies. J. Eng. Technol. Manag. 21, 115–142 (2004)
Siegel, D.S., Waldman, D., Link, A.: Assessing the impact of organizational practices on the relative productivity of university technology transfer offices: an exploratory study. Res. Policy 32, 27–48 (2003)
Siguaw, J.A., Bakes, T.L., Simpson, P.M.: Preliminary evidence on the composition of relational exchange and its outcomes: the distributor perspective. J. Bus. Res. 56, 311–322 (2003)
Small and Medium Enterprise Administration of Ministry of Economic Affairs: The Definition, Purposes, Functions and Services of Incubation Centers. Small and Medium Enterprise Administration of Ministry of Economic Affairs. http://incubator.moeasmea.gov.tw/incubator-service-2.html (2012). Accessed 1 Jan 2016
Styhre, A., Lind, F.: The softening bureaucracy: accommodating new research opportunities in the entrepreneurial university. Scand. J. Manag. 26, 107–120 (2010)
Tartari, V., Salter, A., D’Este, P.: Crossing the Rubicon: exploring the factors that shape academics’ perceptions of the barriers to working with industry. Cambr. J. Econ. 36, 655–677 (2012)
Thursby, J.G., Kemp, S.: Growth and productive efficiency of university intellectual property licensing. Res. Policy 31, 109–124 (2002)
Tsai, M.C., Tsai, T.C.: The myth and loss of university technology licensing and business incubator. NCCU Intellect. Prop. Rev. 5, 81–98 (2007)
Tzeng, G.H., Chiang, C.H., Li, C.W.: Evaluating interwind effects in e-learning programs: a novel hybrid MCDM model based on factor analysis and DEMATEL. Expert Syst. Appl. 32, 1028–1044 (2007)
van der Sijde, P.C.: Profiting from knowledge circulation: the gains from university-industry interaction. Ind. High. Educ. 26, 15–19 (2012)
Wang, Z., Mathiyazhagan, K., Xu, L., Diabat, A.: A decision making trial and evaluation laboratory approach to analyse the barriers to Green Supply Chain Management adoption in a food packaging company. J. Clean. Prod. 117, 19–28 (2016)
Wu, H.Y.: Constructing a strategy map for banking institutions with key performance indicators of the balanced scorecard. Eval. Program Plan. 35, 303–320 (2012)
Wu, W.W.: Choosing knowledge management strategies by using a combined ANP and DEMATEL approach. Expert Syst. Appl. 35, 828–835 (2008)
Xia, X., Govindan, K., Zhu, Q.: Analysing internal barriers for automotive parts remanufacturers in China using grey-DEMATEL approach. J. Clean. Prod. 87, 811–825 (2015)
Zhu, Q., Sarkis, J., Geng, Y.: Barriers to environmentally-friendly clothing production among Chinese apparel companies. Asian. Bus. Manag. 10, 425–452 (2011)
Zhu, Q., Sarkis, J., Lai, K.H.: Reprint of “supply chain-based barriers for truck-engine remanufacturing in China”. Transp. Res. Part E 74, 94–108 (2015)
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by the Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan (Grant No. 104-2410-H-415-041). The insightful comments from the reviewers are gratefully acknowledged.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shen, YC. Identifying the key barriers and their interrelationships impeding the university technology transfer in Taiwan: a multi-stakeholder perspective. Qual Quant 51, 2865–2884 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-016-0450-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-016-0450-y