Advertisement

Quality & Quantity

, Volume 51, Issue 4, pp 1645–1661 | Cite as

Drawing democracy: popular conceptions of democracy in Germany

  • Lina Silveira
  • Horst-Alfred HeinrichEmail author
Article
  • 319 Downloads

Abstract

There are various ways to measure attitudes toward democracy. But what does democracy mean? Here, it is inquired into democracy as concept by getting insight into people’s understanding of it. In the paper, first, a four-dimensional concept is theoretically proposed. Furthermore, it is assumed that word-based questionnaires only provide limited access to the four dimensions of meaning. Consequently, a visualbased methodology is developed and applied. In the empirical part of the study, German citizens were invited to draw and verbally explain their images of democracy. This research yields evidence for following assumptions: (1) visual research reveals that democracy is indeed perceived as multifaceted concept in society together with reinforcement of results found by word-base methodologies; (2) the visual approach brings new insights to the realm of democratic theory; and (3) the four-dimensional approach is a possible framework to cluster the variety of definitions that might be offered by ordinary citizens to the concept of democracy.

Keywords

Visual analysis Drawing Democracy theory Democracy concepts 

References

  1. ALLBUS: Allgemeine Bevölkerungsumfrage Sozialwissenschaften/The General Social Population Survey. Gesis, Mannheim. http://www.gesis.org/allbus/allbus-inhalte/schwerpunktthemen/ (1988ff). Accessed 5 May 2016
  2. Almond, G., Verba, S.: The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations. SAGE, London (1963)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Awan, F.: Young People, Identity and the Media: a Study of Conceptions of Self-Identity among Youth in Southern England. Ph.D. diss. Bournemouth University. http://www.artlab.org.uk/fatimah-awan-phd.htm (2007). Accessed 5 May 2016
  4. Backett-Milburn, K., McKie, L.: A critical appraisal of the draw and write technique. Health Educ. Res. 14, 387–398 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baviskar, S., Malone, M.F.T.: What democracy means to citizens—and why it matters? Revista Europea de Estudios Latinoamericanos y del Caribe 76, 3–23 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bendelow, G., Oakley, A.: Young People and Cancer: Final Report. Social Science Research Unit, Women’s Nationwide Cancer Control Campaign, and University of London, London (1993)Google Scholar
  7. Bertrand, M., Mullainathan, S.: Do people mean what they say? Implications for subjective survey data. Am. Econ. Rev. 91, 67–72 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Betts, S.: The bigger picture of drawing: a new curriculum, a new pedagogy. In: Kantrowitz, A., Brew, A., Fava, M. (eds.) Thinking Through Drawing: Practice into Knowledge. Proceedings of an Interdisciplinary Symposium on Drawing, Cognition and Education, pp. 27–33. Columbia University, New York (2011)Google Scholar
  9. Boulding, K.E.: National images and international systems. J. Confl. Resolut. 3, 120–131 (1959)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Braun, M.: Communication and social cognition. In: Harkness, J.A., van de Vijver, F.J.R., Mohler, P.P. (eds.) Cross-Cultural Survey Methods, pp. 57–67. Wiley, Hoboken (2003)Google Scholar
  11. Buckingham, D.: ‘Creative’ visual methods in media research: possibilities, problems and proposals. Media Cult. Soc. 31, 633–652 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Canache, D.: Citizens’ conceptualizations of democracy: structural complexity, substantive content, and political significance. Comp. Polit. Stud. 45, 1132–1158 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Christidou, V., Hatzinikita, V., Dimitriou, A.: Children’s drawings about environmental phenomena: the use of visual codes. Int. J. Sci. Soc. 1, 107–117 (2009)Google Scholar
  14. Dalton, R.J., Shin, D.C., Jou, W.: Popular conceptions of the meaning of democracy: democratic understanding in unlikely places. CSD Center for the Study of Democracy. http://escholarship.org/uc/item/2j74b860 (2007). Accessed 5 May 2016
  15. Diamond, L.: How people view democracy: findings from public opinion surveys in four regions. Paper Presented at the Stanford Seminar on Democratization, California. http://web.stanford.edu/~ldiamond/papers/howPeopleViewDem.pdf (2001). Accessed 5 May 2016
  16. Dogan, M., Pelassy, D.: How to Compare Nations: Strategies in Comparative Politics. Chatham House, Chatham (1984)Google Scholar
  17. Eco, U.: A Theory of Semiotics. Indiana University Bloomington, Bloomington (1976)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Emmison, M.: Conceptualizing visual data. In: Silverman, D. (ed.) Qualitative Research, 3rd edn, pp. 233–249. SAGE, London (2011)Google Scholar
  19. ESS: European Social Survey: topics and variables. http://www.europeansocialsurvey.org/data/module-index.html (2012). Accessed 5th May 2016
  20. Fleury, A.M.: Drawing as a user experience research tool. In: Bødker, M., Nawaz, A., Petersen, G.S. (eds.) Proceedings of the 11th Danish Human-Computer Interaction Research Symposium, pp. 14–17. Department of IT Management, Frederiksberg (2011)Google Scholar
  21. Ganesh, T.G.: Analyzing subject-produced drawings: the use of the draw-an-engineer assessment in context. Presented at 118th ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Vancouver. http://www.asee.org/public/conferences/1/papers/2655/view (2011). Accessed 5 May 2016
  22. Gauntlett, D.: Media, Gender, Identity: An Introduction, 2nd edn. Routledge, London (2008)Google Scholar
  23. Grady, J.: Visual sociology. In Bryant, C.D., Peck, D.L. (eds.) Specialty and Interdisciplinary Studies, vol. 2 of 21st Century Sociology: A Reference Handbook, pp. 63–70. SAGE, Thousand Oaks, CA (2007)Google Scholar
  24. Guillemin, M.: Understanding illness: using drawings as a research method. Qual. Health Res. 14, 272–289 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Habermas, J.: Three normative models of democracy. Constellations 1, 1–10 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Harkness, J.A., van de Vijver, F.J.R., Mohler, PPh: Cross-Cultural Survey Methods. Wiley, Hoboken (2003)Google Scholar
  27. Haug, L.: Junge StaatsbürgerInnen? Politik in Zukunftsvorstellungen von Kindern/Young citizens? Children’s political images. Springer VS, Wiesbaden (2011)Google Scholar
  28. Haug, L.: A picture paints a thousand words: children’s drawings as a medium to study early political socialisation. In: Abendschön, S. (ed.) Growing into Politics: Contexts and Timing of Political Socialisation, pp. 231–272. Colchester, ECPR (2013)Google Scholar
  29. Heinrich, H.-A.: Who perceives the collective past and how? Are refusals on open-ended questions substantial answers? Qual. Quant. 39, 559–579 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hinthorne, L.L.: A picture is worth a thousand words: using the visual interpretation narrative exercise to elicit non-elite perceptions of democracy. Field Methods 24, 348–364 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Holden, B.: Understanding Liberal Democracy. Allan, Oxford (1988)Google Scholar
  32. Huber, E., Rueschemeyer, D., Stephens, J.D.: The paradoxes of contemporary democracy: formal, participatory and social democracy. Comp. Polit. 29, 323–342 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Inglehart, R.: How solid is mass support for democracy—and how can we measure it? Polit. Sci. Polit. 36, 51–57 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Inglehart, R., Welzel, C.: Political culture and democracy: analyzing cross-level linkages. Comp. Polit. 36, 61–79 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Inglehart, R., Welzel, C.: Modernization, Cultural Change, and Democracy: the Human Development Sequence. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lakoff, S.A.: Democracy: History, Theory, Practice. Westview Press, Boulder (1996)Google Scholar
  37. Lakoff, G.: The neural theory of metaphor. In: Gibbs Jr, R.W. (ed.) Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thoughts, pp. 17–38. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lauth, H.-J.: Demokratieentwicklung und demokratische Qualität/Development of democracy and democratic qualities. In: Gabriel, O.W., Kropp, S. (eds.) Die EU-Staaten im Vergleich. Strukturen, Prozesse, und Politikinhalte/The EU Countries in Comparison: Structures, Processes, and Policies, pp. 33–61, 3rd edn. VS, Wiesbaden (2008)Google Scholar
  39. Lippmann, W.: Public Opinion, 10th edn. Project Gutenberg Ebook. http://www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/6456/pg6456.html (2004). Accessed 5 May 2016
  40. Literat, I.: ‘A Pencil for Your Thoughts’: participatory drawing as a visual research method with children and youth. Int. J. Qual. Methods 12, 84–98 (2013)Google Scholar
  41. Manin, B., Przeworski, A., Stokes, S.C.: Elections and representation. In: Manin, B., Przeworski, A., Stokes, S.C. (eds.) Democracy, Accountability, and Representation, pp. 29–54. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Marcus, R.R., Mease, K., Ottemoeller, D.: Popular definitions of democracy from Uganda, Madagascar, and Florida, USA. In: Ndegwa, S.N. (ed.) A Decade of Democracy in Africa, pp. 113–132. Koninklijke Brill, Leiden (2001)Google Scholar
  43. Mitchell, C., Theron, L., Stuart, J., Smith, A., Campbell, Z.: Drawings as research method. In: Theron, L., Mitchell, C., Smith, A., Stuart, J. (eds.) Picturing Research: Drawing as Visual Methodology, pp. 19–36. Sense, Rotterdam (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Moore, M.G.: Drawing drawings. Thinking through drawing: practice into knowledge. In: Kantrowitz, A., Brew, A., Fava, M. (eds.) Proceedings of an Interdisciplinary Symposium on Drawing, Cognition and Education. Teachers College, Columbia University, New York, pp. 35–37 (2011)Google Scholar
  45. Müller, M.G.: Iconography and iconology as a visual method and approach. In: Margolis, E., Pauwels, L. (eds.) The Sage Handbook of Visual Research Methods, pp. 283–297. SAGE, Los Angeles (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Munck, G.L.: Measuring Democracy: A Bridge Between Scholarship and Politics. Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore (2009)Google Scholar
  47. Panofsky, E.: Meaning in the Visual Arts. University of Chicago, Chicago (1982)Google Scholar
  48. Peterson, M.A.: Object perception. In: Goldstein, E.B. (ed.) Blackwell Handbook of Perception, pp. 168–203. Blackwell, Malden (2001)Google Scholar
  49. Pickel, S., Pickel, G.: Politische Kultur- und Demokratieforschung. Grundbegriffe, Theorien, Methoden—Eine Einführung/Research on Political Culture and Democracy: An Introduction. VS, Wiesbaden (2006)Google Scholar
  50. Reavey, P. (ed.): Visual Methods in Psychology: Using and Interpreting Images in Qualitative Research. Psychology Press, Hove (2011)Google Scholar
  51. Schmidbauer, M.: Das kreative Netzwerk. Wie unser Gehirn in Bildern spricht/The Creative Network: How Our Brain Operates Pictures. Springer, Wien (2004)Google Scholar
  52. Schmidt, M.G.: Demokratietheorien. Eine Einführung/Democracy Theory: An Introduction, 3rd edn. VS, Wiesbaden (2006)Google Scholar
  53. Schuman, H., Presser, S.: Questions and Answers in Attitude Surveys: Experiments on Question Form, Wording and Context, 2nd edn. SAGE, Thousand Oaks (1996)Google Scholar
  54. Seligson, M.A.: Costa Rican exceptionalism: why the Ticos are different. In: Camp, R.A. (ed.) Citizen Views of Democracy in Latin America, pp. 90–106. University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh (2001)Google Scholar
  55. Shastri, S., Palshikar, S.: Democratizing the Meaning of Democracy: Voices from South Asia. Paper Presented at the Global Barometer Surveys Conference, Taiwan. http://stratsight.files.wordpress.com/2012/01/07-20shastri20and20palshikar20print1.pdf (2010). Accessed 5th May 2016
  56. Silveira, L.: Visualizing Democracy in Germany: Popular Conceptions and Symbols. Master’s thesis. University of Passau (2014)Google Scholar
  57. Theron, L., Mitchell, C., Smith, A., Stuart, J. (eds.): Picturing Research: Drawing as Visual Methodology. Sense, Rotterdam (2011)Google Scholar
  58. Thomassen, J.: Support for democratic values. In: Klingemann, H.-D., Fuchs, D. (eds.) Citizens and the State, pp. 383–416. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1995)Google Scholar
  59. Ulker, R., Yilmaz, Z., Solak, A., Erguder, L.: Classroom environment: what does students’ drawings tell? Anthropologist 16, 209–215 (2013)Google Scholar
  60. Verba, S.: On revisiting the civic culture: a personal postscript. In: Almond, G., Verba, S. (eds.) The Civic Culture Revisited, pp. 394–410. Little Brown, Boston (1980)Google Scholar
  61. von Beyme, K.: Die politischen Theorien der Gegenwart. Eine Einführung/Current Political Theories: An Introduction, 8th edn. WV, Wiesbaden (2000)Google Scholar
  62. Westle, B., Gabriel, O.W. (eds.): Politische Kultur. Eine Einführung/Political Culture: An Introduction. Nomos, Baden-Baden (2009)Google Scholar
  63. Wetton, N.M., McWhirter, J.: Images and curriculum development in health education. In: Prosser, J. (ed.) Image-Based Research: A Sourcebook for Qualitative Researchers, pp. 263–283. Falmer, London (1998)Google Scholar
  64. Wood, G.S.: Democracy and the American revolution. In: Dunn, J. (ed.) Democracy: The Unfinished Journey, 508 BC to AD 1993, pp. 91–105. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1992)Google Scholar
  65. Young, L., Barrett, H.: Adapting research methods with Kampala street children. Childhood 8, 383–395 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Methods of Empirical Social ResearchUniversity of PassauPassauGermany

Personalised recommendations