Quality & Quantity

, Volume 50, Issue 3, pp 1093–1115 | Cite as

Skills and training requirements of municipal directors: a statistical assessment

  • Marco MarozziEmail author
  • Mario Bolzan


A survey has been performed in collaboration with the National Association of the Municipalities of Italy (Veneto region) to study the role of the municipalities with regard to the local area, to reconceptualize the profile of public directors and to study municipal directors as far as requirements in terms of competencies for skills and training are concerned. In the paper the importance of municipal director requirements for skills and training is assessed using composite indicators. The analysis showed that the most important skill requirements refer to internal aspects of the organization, whereas the most important training requirements refer also to external aspects. The analysis has been repeated on the strata of municipal directors obtained by considering municipality population, director sex, length of service, education and opinions about municipal mission. It is shown that the various strata of directors are rather concordant in assessing the importance of skill and training requirements. Municipal directors are aware of Italian public administration now being oriented toward new public management where they are assessed according to the results they produce. The robustness of the results has been addressed using uncertainty analysis.


Composite indicators Delphi survey Monte Carlo methods Uncertainty analysis Preference ratings 


  1. Angell, R.C.: The social integration of selected American cities. Am. J. Sociol. 47, 575–592 (1942)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aiello, F., Attanasio, M.: How to transform a batch of simple indicators to make up a unique one? Atti del Convegno SIS, (2004) 327–338Google Scholar
  3. Arboretti, G.R., Bonnini, S., Salmaso, L.: A performance indicator for multivariate data. Quad. di Stat. 9, 1–29 (2007)Google Scholar
  4. Barbieri, E., Di Tommaso, M.R., Bonnini, S.: Industrial development policies and performances in Southern China: beyond the specialised industrial cluster program. China Econ. Rev. 23, 613–625 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blalock, H.M.: Conceptualization and measurement on the social sciences. Sage, Beverly Hills (1982)Google Scholar
  6. Bolzan, M.: L’identitá professionale del personale dirigente degli enti locali del Veneto: Competenze, gabbisogno formativo in relazione al territorio e missione dell’ente. In: Bolzan, M. (ed.) Competenze e processi formativi per i dirigenti degli enti locali, pp. 13–54. Cleup, Padua (2010)Google Scholar
  7. Boyatzis, R.E.: The Competent Manager: A Model for Effective Performance. Wiley, New York (1982)Google Scholar
  8. Cox, D.R., Fitzpatrick, R., Fletcher, A.E., Gore, S.M., Spiegelhalter, D.J., Jones, D.R.: Quality-of-life assessment: can we keep it simple (with discussion)? J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. A 155, 353–393 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fayers, P.M., Hand, D.J.: Causal variables, composite indicators and measurement scales: an example from quality of life. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. A 165, 233–261 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Graeff, P., Svendsen, G.T.: Trust and corruption: The influence of positive and negative social capital on the economic development in the European Union. Qual. Quant. 47, 2829–2846 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hagerty, M.R., Land, K.C.: Constructing summary indices of quality of life. Sociol. Methods Res. 35, 455–496 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hochbaum, D.S., Levin, A.: Methodologies and algorithms for group-rankings decision. Manag. Sci. 52, 1394–1408 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hood, C., Lodge, M.: Competency, bureaucracy and public management reform: a comparative analysis. Gov. Int. J. Policy Adm. Inst. 17, 313–333 (2004)Google Scholar
  14. Isljamovic, S., Jeremic, V., Petrovic, N., Radojicic, Z.: Colouring the socio-economic development into green: I-distance framework for countries’ welfare evaluation. Qual. Quant. (2014). doi: 10.1007/s11135-014-0012-0
  15. Lago, A., Pesarin, F.: Nonparametric combination of dependent rankings with application to the quality assessment of industrial products. Metron 58, 39–52 (2000)Google Scholar
  16. Marozzi, M.: A composite indicator dimension reduction procedure with application to university student satisfaction. Stat. Neerl. 63, 258–268 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Marozzi, M.: Tertiary student satisfaction with socialization: a statistical assessment. Qual. Quan. 46, 1271–1278 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Marozzi, M.: Construction, dimension reduction and uncertainty analysis of an index of trust in public institutions. Qual. Quan. 48, 939–953 (2014a)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Marozzi, M.: Measuring trust in European public institutions. Soc. Indic. Res. (2014b). doi: 10.1007/s11205-014-0765-9
  20. Noordegraaf, M.: Professional sense-makers: managerial competencies amidst ambiguity. Int. J. Public Sect. Manag. 13, 319–332 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. OECD: Handbook on Constructing Composite Indicators. OECD, Paris (2008)Google Scholar
  22. OECD: Citizens as Partners: OECD Handbook of Information, Consultation and Public Participation in Policy Making. OECD, Paris (2011)Google Scholar
  23. Osborne, D., Gaebler, T.: Reinventing Government. Addison-Wesley, New York (1992)Google Scholar
  24. Pollitt, C., Bouckaert, G.: Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2004)Google Scholar
  25. Saisana, M., Saltelli, A., Tarantola, S.: Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis techniques as tools for the quality assessment of composite indicators. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. A 168, 307–323 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Saisana, M., d’Hombres, B., Saltelli, A.: Rickety numbers: volatility of university rankings and policy implications. Res. Policy 40, 165–177 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. United Nations Development Programme: Human Development Report (2014) Cited 7 Jan 2014
  28. Uslaner, E.M.: Trust and corruption revisited: how and why trust and corruption shape each other. Qual. Quant. 47, 3603–3608 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Virtanen, T.: Changing competences of public manager: tension in commitment. Int. J. Public Sect. Manag. 13, 333–341 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Walker, R.M., Damanpour, F., Devece, C.A.: Management innovation and organizational performance: the mediating effect of performance management. J. Public Adm. Res. 21, 367–386 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Wright, B.E.: Public sector work motivation: review of current literature and a revised conceptual model. J. Public Adm. Res. 11, 529–586 (2001)Google Scholar
  32. Zhou, P., Ang, B.W.: Comparing MCDA aggregation methods in constructing composite indicators using the Shannon-Spearman measure. Soc. Indic. Res. 94, 83–96 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Università della CalabriaRende (CS)Italy
  2. 2.Università di PadovaPadovaItaly

Personalised recommendations