Advertisement

Quality & Quantity

, Volume 49, Issue 3, pp 999–1012 | Cite as

A hedonic price analysis for the Italian wine in the domestic market

  • Eugenio BrentariEmail author
  • Rosella Levaggi
  • Paola Zuccolotto
Article

Abstract

Price formation in the domestic market has not been widely studied in spite of the importance of the Italian wine market in terms of sales. We use a unique dataset to estimate the hedonic price function for Italian wine sold on the Italian market in the period 2005–2011. For each bottle considered, the dataset records several characteristics such as the price by retail channel (on the mass market and in wine shops), label characteristics, chemical analysis, sensory evaluations and experts’ opinions. The objective of the analysis is to examine price setting on the mass market and in wine shops and to explore the differences in price formation for red and white wines. Our results have been obtained using an innovative technique that consists of combining hedonic price techniques with dimensionality reduction tools.

Keywords

Price formation mechanism Hedonic price function Canonical correlation analysis Latent factors 

References

  1. Altroconsumo Edizioni: Guida Vini, Milano (2006–2012)Google Scholar
  2. Amenta, P.: Multiple Co-Inertia Analysis with Linear Constraints. Caribb. J. Sci. Technol. 1, 37–52 (2007)Google Scholar
  3. Benfratello, L., Piacenza, M., Sacchetto, S.: Taste or reputation: what drives market price in the wine industry? Estimation of a hedonic model for Italian Premium wines. Appl. Econ. 41(17), 2197–2209 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brentari, E. Levaggi, R.: The hedonic price for Italian red wine: do chemical and sensory characteristics matter?. Agribusiness (2014). doi: 10.1002/agr.21377
  5. Brentari, E., Levaggi, R., Zuccolotto, P.: Pricing strategies for Italian red wines. Food Qual. Prefer. 22, 725–732 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brentari, E., Zuccolotto, P.: The impact of chemical and sensory characteristics on the market price of Italian red wines. Electron. J. Appl. Stat. Anal. 4, 265–276 (2011)Google Scholar
  7. Breusch, T.S., Pagan, A.R.: The lagrange multiplier test and its applications to model specification in econometrics. Rev. Econ. Stud. 47(1), 239–253 (1980)Google Scholar
  8. Chessel, D., Mercier, P.: Couplage de triplets statistiques et liaisons espèces-environnement. In: Lebreton, J.D., Asselain, B. (eds.) Biométrie et Enviro., pp. 15–44. Masson, Paris (1993)Google Scholar
  9. Cherry, S.: Singular value decomposition analysis and canonical correlation analysis. J. Clim. 9, 2003–2009 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cherry, S.: Some comments on singular value decomposition analsis. J. Clim. 10(7), 1759–1761 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Combris, P., Lecocq, S., Visser, M.: Estimation of a hedonic price equation for Bordeaux wine: does quality matter? Econ. J. 107, 390–402 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Corduas, M., Cinquanta, L., Ievoli, C.: The importance of wine attributes for purchase decisions: a study of Italian consumers’ perception. Food Qual. Prefer. 28(2), 407–418 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Corsi, A., Strom, S.: The premium for organic wines. estimating a hedonic price farm-gate price equation. J. Wine Econ. 8(1), 28–48 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Costanigro, M., McCluskey, J.J.: Segmenting the wine market based on price: hedonic regression when different prices mean different products. J. Agric. Econ. 58(3), 454–466 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Galizzi, M.: Millesimèe Pas Operè vs Gran Cuveè Satin: estimation of a hedonic price model for the Franciacorta Bollicine. In: First International Conference of American Association of Wine Economists, Trier (2007)Google Scholar
  16. Galizzi, M., Miniaci, R.: Cin Cin! Competing for the leadership in the Italian sparkling wine market: Franciacorta versus Trento. In: Third International Conference of American Association of Wine Economists, Reims Management School, Reims (2009)Google Scholar
  17. Halvorsen, R., Palmquist, R.: The interpretation of dummy variables in semilogarithmic equations. Am. Econ. Rev. 70, 474–475 (1980)Google Scholar
  18. Hotelling, H.: Relations between two sets of variates. Biometrika 28(3/4), 321–377 (1936)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ismea: Tendenze recenti del mercato dei vini DOC-DOCG e IGT. http://www.ismea.it/flex/cm/pages/serveblob.php/L/IT/idpagina/4172 (2009)
  20. Ismea: Aspetti strutturali e di mercato nel comparto dei vini DOC-DOCG. http://www.ismea.it/flex/cm/pages/serveblob.php/L/IT/idpagina/2945 (2009)
  21. Orrego, M.J.E., Defrancesco, E., Gennari, A.: The wine hedonic price models, “Old and New World”: state of the art. Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias 44(1), 205–220 (2012)Google Scholar
  22. Ramsey, J.B.: Tests for specification errors in classical linear least squares regression analysis. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B. 31(2), 350–371 (1969)Google Scholar
  23. Roma, P., Di Martino, G., Perrone, G.: What to show on the wine labels: a hedonic analysis of price drivers of Sicilian wines. Appl. Econ. 45(19), 2765–2778 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Steiner, B.: Valuing labeling attributes with hedonic price analysis: Australian wines in the British wine market. Agribusiness 20(3), 287–307 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Zironi, R., Odello, L., Brentari, E.: Un nuovo indice per misurare la qualità edonica del vino, L’assaggio, 1, 25–29 (2003); published also on: Il Sommelier, 19(3), 15–17 (2003)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eugenio Brentari
    • 1
    Email author
  • Rosella Levaggi
    • 1
  • Paola Zuccolotto
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Economics and ManagementUniversity of BresciaBresciaItaly

Personalised recommendations