Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Top Management Teams’ demographic characteristics and their influence on strategic change

  • Published:
Quality & Quantity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to analyse the relation between the Top Management Teams (TMTs)’ socio demographic’ characteristics and the corporate strategic change, measured as Carpenter (Strateg Manag J 23:275–284, 2002) through Finkelstein and Hambrick’s index (Adm Sci Q 35:484–504, 1990): the strategic variation index and strategic deviation index in the period 2007–2009. While this aim has been studied previously in the Upper Echelon Literature, the results achieved have been considered ambiguous and no concluding by some researchers. Hence this paper admits that this complex relation rooted in this stream thought, needs to be further explored as supported by those authors. The achieved findings not only shed light on the organizational demographics’ black box but also enrichment the academic literature in this respect. A sample of 157 big firms from different industrial sector and nationalities with their headquarters in Spain was determined by using both secondary and primary sources due to the legal difficulties imposed by LORTAD which prevents the collection and consult of the top managers’ personal information unlike other countries. Lineal regression models were applied to test the hypotheses formulated in the study. By controlling for firm performance and the industrial sector, a higher educational level, shorter firm tenures, higher international experience and a higher professional background greatly influence on corporate strategy changes. Furthermore while the firm performance seems to influence the strategic change, the industrial sector does not contribute significantly on this managerial variable. Few researchers examine the influence of TMTs’ characteristics in shaping corporative strategic changes and firm outcomes using samples different from American enterprises. This paper also contributes to the existing literature by proposing different models which explain the strategic changes, measured by different indicators, using more explanatory demographical variables than in other studies and also including control variables related performance and industrial sector to reduce the ambiguity and increase the reliability of the previous researches.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. LORTAD, Organic Spanish Law, specifically, Ley Orgánica 5/1992, October 29th, on the treatment of the personal data.

  2. SABI is a database created by the company Informa that has collected annual accounts from the main Spanish and Portuguese companies since 1990. It is an interesting tool that helps with business analysis, comparisons between companies or company groups, rankings, concentration and segmentation analysis, and sectorial studies.

  3. CNMV is the Spanish government agency responsible for the financial regulation of these securities markets in Spain. It is an independent agency that falls under the Ministry of Economy and Finance of Spain.

References

  • Agarwal, R., Helfat, C.E.: Strategic renewal of organizations. Organ. Sci. 20(2), 281–293 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, K.: The Concept of Corporate Strategy. Dow Jones-Irwin, Homewood (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ansoff, H.I.: Corporate Strategy: An Analytic Approach to Business Policy for Growth and Expansion. McGraw-Hill, New York (1965)

    Google Scholar 

  • Athanassoupoulos, A.D.: Strategic groups, frontier benchmarking and performance differences: evidence from the UK retail grocery industry. J. Manag. Stud. 40(4), 921–939 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bantel, K.A.: Top team, environment, and performance effects on strategic planning formality. Group Org. Manag. 18(4), 436–459 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bantel, K.A.: Strategic planning openness: the role of top team demography. Group Org. Manag. 19(4), 406–425 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bantel, K.A., Jackson, S.E.: Top management and innovation in banking: does the composition of the top team make a difference? Strateg. Manag. J. 10, 107–124 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barker III, V.L., Barr, P.S.: Linking top manager attributions to strategic reorientation in declining firms attempting turnarounds. J. Bus. Res. 55(12), 963–979 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barker III, V.L., Patterson Jr, P.W., Mueller, G.C.: Organizational causes and strategic consequences of the extent of top management team replacement during turnaround attempts. J. Manag. Stud. 38(2), 235–269 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bass, F.M., Cattin, P., Wittink, D.: Firm effects and industry effects in the analysis of market structure and profitability. J. Mark. Res. 15, 3–10 (1978)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, M.: Sociometric location and innovativeness. Am. Sociol. Rev. 35, 267–304 (1970)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beckman, C.M., Burton, M.D.: Bringing organizational demography back. Time, change and structure in top management team research. In Carpenter, M. (ed.) Handbook of Top Management Team Research. Edward Elgar, New York (2011)

  • Bem, D.J.: Self-perception theory. In: Berkowitz, L. (ed.) Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, vol. 6, pp. 1–62. Academic Press, New York (1972)

    Google Scholar 

  • Boal, K.B., Hooijberg, R.: Strategic leadership research: moving on. Leadersh. Q. 11(4), 515–549 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boeker, W.B.: Strategic change: the influence of managerial characteristics and organizational growth. Acad. Manag. J. 40(1), 152–170 (1997a)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boeker, W.B.: Executive migration and strategic change: the effect of top manager movement on product-market entry. Adm. Sci. Q. 42, 213–236 (1997b)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bohman, H., Lindfors, M.J.: Management for change: on strategic change during recession. J. Bus. Res. 41(1), 57–71 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolo, D., Muchemi, A.W., Ogutu, M.: Diversity in the top management teams and effects on vorporate performance. Prime J. Bus. Adm. Manag. 1(3), 82–92 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  • Boone, C., Van Olffen, W., van Witteloostuijn, A.: Team locus-of-control composition, leadership structure, information acquisition, and financial performance: a business simulation study. Acad. Manag. J. 48(5), 889–909 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brass, D.J.: Being in the right place: a structural analysis of individual influence in an organization. Adm. Sci. Q. 29, 518–539 (1984)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Canella Jr, A.A., Monroe, M.J.: Contrasting perspectives on strategic leaders: toward a more realistic view of top managers. J. Manag. 23, 213–237 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, R.O.: School Superintendents: Career and Performance. Merrill, Columbia (1972)

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, M.A.: The price of change: the role of CEO compensation in strategic variation and deviation from industry strategy norms. J. Manag. 26, 1179–1198 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, M.A.: The implications of strategy and social context for the relationship between top management team heterogeneity and firm performance. Strateg. Manag. J. 23, 275–284 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, M.A., Fredrickson, J.W.: Top management teams, global strategic posture, and the moderating role of uncertainty. Acad. Manag. J. 44(3), 533–545 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, M.A., Geletkanycz, M.A., Sanders, W.G.: Upper echelon research revisited: antecedents, elements, and consequences of top management team composition. J. Manag. 30(6), 749–778 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  • Carson, C.M., Mosley, D.C., Boyar, S.L.: Performance gains through diverse top management teams. Team Perform. Manag. 10, 121–126 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Child, J.: Organizational structure, environment, and performance: the role of strategic choice. Sociology 6, 1–22 (1972)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, E., Soulsby, A.: Understanding top management and organizational change through demographic and processual analysis. J. Manag. Stud. 44(6), 932–954 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cyert, R.M., March, J.G.: A Behavioural Theory of the Firm. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1963)

    Google Scholar 

  • Daft, R.L., Weick, K.E.: Toward a model of organizations as interpretation systems. Acad. Manag. Rev. 9(2), 284–295 (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  • Denis, D.J., Denis, D.K.: Performance changes following top management dismissals. J. Finance 1(4), 1029–1057 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dollinger, M.J.: Environmental boundary spanning and information processing effects on organizational performance. Acad. Manag. J. 27, 351–368 (1984)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dutton, J.E.: Understanding strategic agenda building and its implication for managing change. Scand. J. Manag. Stud. 3, 3–24 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dutton, J.E., Ashford, S.J., O’Neill, R.M., Lawrence, K.A.: Moves that matter: issue selling and organizational change. Acad. Manag. J. 44(4), 716–736 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K.M., Kahwajy, J.L., Bourgeois III, L.J.: Conflict and strategic choice: how top management team disagree. Calif. Manag. Rev. 39(2), 42–62 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finkelstein, S.: Power in top management teams: dimensions, measurement, and validation. Acad. Manag. J. 35, 505–538 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finkelstein, S.: What boards need to know: early warning signs that provide insight to what is really going on in companies. In: Conger, J. (ed.) Boardroom Realities, Chap. 5, pp. 365–400. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco (2009)

  • Finkelstein, S., Hambrick, D.C.: Top management team tenure and organizational outcomes: the moderating role of managerial discretion. Adm. Sci. Q. 35, 484–504 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finkelstein, S., Hambrick, D.C.: Strategic Leadership: Top Executives and Their Effects on Organizations. West Publishing Company, St. Paul (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  • Finkelstein, S., Hambrick, D.C., Cannella, A.A.: Strategic Leadership: Theory and Research on Executives, Top Management Teams, and Boards. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiske, S.T., Taylor, S.E.: Social Cognition, 2nd edn. McGraw Hill, New York (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  • Fombrun, C.: Reputation: Realizing Value from the Corporate Image. Harvard Business School Press, Boston (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, F.V., Staw, B.M.: The trapped administrator: effects of job insecurity and policy resistance upon commitment to a course of action. Adm. Sci. Q. 24, 449–471 (1979)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franceschini, F., Turina, E.: Quality improvement and redesign of performance measurement systems: an application to the academic field. Qual. Quant. 47(1), 465–483 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • French, J.R.P., Raven, B.: The bases of social power. In: Cartwright, D. (ed.) Studies in Social Power, pp. 150–167. University Michigan, Oxford (1959)

    Google Scholar 

  • Golden, B.R., Zajac, E.J.: When will boards influence strategy? Inclination \(\times \) power = strategic change. Strateg. Manag. J. 22, 1087–1111 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gort, M.: Diversification and Integration in American Industry. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1962)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottfredson, M., Puryear, R., Phillips, S.: Strategic sourcing—from periphery to the core. Harv. Bus. Rev. 83(2), 132–145 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimm, C.M., Smith, K.G.: Management and organizational change: a note on the railroad industry. Strateg. Manag. J. 12, 557–562 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grinyier, P.H., Spender, J.C.: Recipes, crises, and adaptation in mature businesses. Int. Stud. Manag. Org. 9, 113–133 (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  • Guadalupe, Maria, Li, Hongyi, Wulf, Julie M.: Who lives in the c-suite? Organizational structure and the division of labor in top management, Discussion Paper Series. Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit 6635, 1–33 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  • Guzzo, R.A., Dickson, M.W.: Teams in organizations: recent research on performance and effectiveness. In: Spence, J.T., Baerley, J.M., Foss, J. (eds.) Annual Review of Psychology, vol. 47, pp. 307–338. Annual Reviews, Palo Alto (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hambel, G., Prahalad, C.K.: Competing for the Future. Harvard Business School Press, Boston (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hambrick, D.C.: Top management team groups: a conceptual integration and reconsideration of the “team” label. Res. Org. Behav. 16, 175–214 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hambrick, D.C.: Upper echelons theory: an update. Acad. Manag. Rev. 32(2), 334–343 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hambrick, D.C., Mason, P.A.: Upper echelons: the organization as a reflection of its top managers. Acad. Manag. Rev. 9, 193–206 (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hambrick, D.C., Schechter, S.: Turn around strategies for mature industrial product of business units. Acad. Manag. J. 26, 231–248 (1983)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hambrick, D.C., Chen, M., Cho, T.S.: Top management team heterogeneity and competitive behaviours of the firm, Working Paper. Columbia University Business School, Manhattan (1995)

  • Hambrick, D.C., Geletkanycz, M., Fredrickson, J.: Top executive commitment to the status quo: a test of some of its determinants. Strateg. Manag. J. 14, 410–418 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helmich, D.L., Brown, W.B.: Successor type and organizational change in the corporate enterprise. Adm. Sci. Q. 17, 371–381 (1972)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, A.D., Miller, D., Hambrick, D.C.: How quickly do CEOs become obsolete? Industry dynamism, CEO tenure and company performance. Strateg. Manag. J. 27, 447–460 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hermann, P., Datta, D.: Relationships between top management team characteristics and international diversification: an empirical investigation. Br. J. Manag. 16, 69–78 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hitt, M.A., Tyler, B.: Strategic decision models: integrating different perspectives. Strateg. Manag. J. 12(5), 327–363 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • House, R.J., Aditya, R.: The social scientific study of leadership: Quo vadis? J. Manag. 23, 409–474 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutzschenreuter, T., Horstkotte, J.: Performance effects of international expansion processes: the moderating role of top management team experiences. Int. Bus. Rev. 22, 259–277 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, S.E.: Team composition in organizational settings: issues in managing an increasingly diverse work force. In: Worchel, S., Wood, W., Simpson, J.A. (eds.) Group Process and Productivity, pp. 138–173. Sage, Newbury Park (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, S.E.: Consequences of group composition for the interpersonal dynamics of strategic issues processing. In: Shrivastava, P., Huff, A., Dutton, J. (eds.) Advances in Strategic Management, pp. 345–382. JAI Press, Greenwich (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  • James, D.R., Soref, M.: Profit constraints in managerial autonomy: managerial theory and the unmaking of the corporation president. Am. Sociol. Rev. 46, 1–18 (1981)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jarzabkowski, P.: Strategic practices: An activity theory perspective on continuity and change. J. Manag. Stud. 40(1), 23–55 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jemison, D.B.: Risk and the relationship among strategy, organizational processes, and performance. Manag. Sci. 33, 1087–1101 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jemison, D.B.: Rethinking strategy (book). Adm. Sci. Q. 47(4), 739–741 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz, R.: The effects of group longevity on project communication and performance. Adm. Sci. Q. 27, 81–104 (1982)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kauer, D., Prinzessin zu Waldeck, T.C., Schäffer, U.: Effects of top management team characteristics on strategic decision making. Shifting attention to team member personalities and mediating processes. Manag. Decis. 45(6), 942–967 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kilduff, M., Angelmar, R., Mehra, A.: Top management-team diversity and firm performance: examining the role of cognitions. Org. Sci. 11(1), 21–34 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kimberly, J., Evanisko, M.: Organizational innovation: the influence of the individual organizational, and contextual factors on hospital adoption of technological and administrative innovations. Acad. Manag. J. 24, 689–713 (1981)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kinuu, D., Murgor, P., Walter, O., Letting, N., Aosa, E.: Upper echelons theory and research. A review of theory and empirical literature 28 years later. Prime J. Bus. Adm. Manag. (BAM) 2(10), 697–703 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkman, B.L., Tesluk, P.E., Rosen, B.: The impact of demographic heterogeneity and team leader team member demographic fit on team empowerment and effectiveness. Group Org. Manag. 29(3), 334–368 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le Pine, J.A.: Team adaptation and post change performance: effects of team composition in terms of members’ cognitive ability and personality. J. Appl. Psychol. 88(1), 27–39 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, H., Park, J.: Top team diversity, internationalization and the mediating effect of international alliances. Br. J. Manag. 17, 195–213 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leonard, N.J., Beauvais, L.L., Scholl, R.W.: A multi-level model of group cognitive style in strategic decision making. J. Manag. Issues 17(1), 119–138 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • Levina, N., Su, N.: Global multisourcing strategy: the emergence of supplier portfolio in services offshoring. Decis. Sci. 39(3), 541–570 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, Y., Tan, C.H.: Matching business strategy and CIO characteristics: the impact on organizational performance. J. Bus. Res. 66, 248–259 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, W.T., Cheng, K.Y.: The effect of upper echelons’ compensation on firm Internationalization. Asia Pac. J. Manag. 30, 73–90 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • March, J.G., Simon, H.A.: Organizations. Wiley, New York (1958)

    Google Scholar 

  • Marimuthu, M., Kolandaisamy, I.: Demographic diversity in top level management and its implications on firm financial performance: an empirical discussion. Int. J. Bus. Manag. 4(6), 176–185 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michel, J.G., Hambrick, D.C.: Diversification posture and top management team characteristics. Acad. Manag. J. 35(1), 9–37 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miles, R., Snow, C.: Designing strategic human resource systems. Org. Dyn. 13(1), 36–52 (1984)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miles, R.E., Snow, C.C., Meyer, A.D., Coleman Jr, H.J.: Organizational strategy, structure, and process. Acad. Manag. Rev. 3, 546–562 (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg, H.: The Structuring of Organizations. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliff (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  • Mischel, W.: The interaction of person and situation. In: Magnusson, D., Ender, N.S. (eds.) Personality at the Crossroads: Current Issues in Interactional Psychology. Erlbaum, Hillsdale (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, S.: Top management team diversity: a review of theories and methodologies. Int. J. Manag. Rev. 11(1), 301–316 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, B.B., Nielsen, S.: Top management team nationality diversity and firm performance: a multilevel study. Strateg. Manag. J. 34, 373–382 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Night, D., Pearce, C.L., Smith, K.G., Olian, J.D., Sims, H.P., Smith, K.A., Flood, P.: Top management team diversity, group process and strategic consensus. Strateg. Manag. J. 20, 445–465 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nishii, L.H., Gotte, A., Raver, J.L.: Upper echelon theory revisited: the relationship between upper echelon diversity, the adoption of diversity practices and organizational performance. CAHRS Working Paper Series. Cornell University (2007)

  • Papadakis, V.M., Barwise, P.: How much do CEO’s and top manager matter in strategic decision making? Br. J. Manag. 13, 83–95 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, C.: The effects of prior performance on the choice between related and unrelated acquisitions: implications for the performance consequences of diversification strategy. J. Manag. Stud. 39(7), 1003–1020 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perlmutter, H.: The tortuous evolution of the multinational corporation. Columbia J. World Bus. 4, 9–18 (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrow, C.: Organizational Analysis: A Sociological View. Tavistock Press, London (1970)

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J.: Organizational demography. In: Cummings, L.L., Staw, B.M. (eds.) Research in Organizational Behaviour, vol. 5, pp. 299–357. JAI Press, Greenwich (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitcher, P., Smith, A.D.: Top management team heterogeneity: personality, power, and proxies. Org. Sci. 12(1), 1–18 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Priem, R.L., Lyon, D.W., Dess, G.G.: Inherent limitations of demographic proxies in top management team heterogeneity research. J. Manag. 25(6), 935–953 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, E., Shoemaker, F.: Communication of Innovations. Free Press, New York (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  • Rumelt, R.: Strategy, structure, and economic performance. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  • Salancik, G.R., Pfeffer, J.: Effects of ownership and performance on executive tenure in U.S. corporation. Acad. Manag. J. 23, 653–664 (1977)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sambharya, R.B.: Foreign experience of top management teams and international diversification strategies of U.S. multinational corporations. Strateg. Manag. J. 17, 739–746 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, W.G.: Behavioral responses of CEO’s to stock ownership and stock option pay. Acad. Manag. J. 44, 477–492 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schroder, H.M., Driver, M.J., Streufert, S.: Human Information Processing: Individuals and Groups Functioning in Complex Social Situations. Holt Rinehart and Winston, New York (1967)

    Google Scholar 

  • Short, J.C., Moss, T.W., Lumpkin, G.T.: Research in social entrepreneurship: Past contributions and future opportunities. Strateg. Entrep. J. 3(2), 161–194 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Staw, R.M.: Knee-deep in the big muddy: a study of escalating commitment to a chosen course of action. Org. Behav. Hum. Perform. 16, 27–44 (1976)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Staw, B.M.: The escalation of commitment to a course of action. Acad. Manag. Rev. 6(4), 577–587 (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  • Tihanyi, L., Ellstrand, A.E., Daily, C.M., Dalton, D.R.: Composition of the top management team and firm international diversification. J. Manag. 26(6), 1157–1177 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsai, M.T., Wu, H.L., Liang, W.K.: Fuzzy decision making for market positioning and developing strategy for improving service quality in department stores. Qual. Quant. 42(3), 303–319 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tuggle, C.S., Schnatterly, K., Johnson, R.A.: Attention patterns in the boardroom: how board composition and processes affect discussion of entrepreneurial issues. Acad. Manag. J. 53(3), 550–571 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tushman, M., Romanelli, E.: Organizational evolution: a metamorphosis model of convergence and reorientation. In: Staw, B.M., Cummings, L.L., et al. (eds.) Research in Organizational Behaviour, vol. 7, pp. 171–172. JAI Press, Greenwich (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  • Uhlenbruck, K., Meyer, K.E., Hitt, M.A.: Organizational transformation in transition economies: resource-based and organizational learning perspectives. J. Manag. Stud. 40(2), 257–282 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Useem, M.: Executive Defense. Shareholder Power and Corporate Reorganization. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldman, D.A., Javidan, M., Varella, P.: Charismatic leadership at the strategic level: a new application of upper echelons theory. Leadersh. Q. 15, 355–380 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wally, S., Becerra, M.: Top management team characteristics and strategic changes in international diversification: the case of U.S. multinationals in the European community. Group Org. Manag. 26(2), 165–188 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, J.P.: Managerial and organizational cognition: notes from a trip down memory lane. Org. Sci. 6(3), 280–321 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westphal, J.D., Fredrickson, J.W.: Who directs strategy change? Director experience, the selection of new CEOs, and change in corporate strategy. Strateg. Manag. J. 22, 1113–1137 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiersema, M., Bird, A.: Organizational strategy. Top management team composition and firm performance. Association of Japanese Business Studies Proceedings (1992)

  • Wiersema, M.F., Bantel, K.A.: Top management team demography and corporate strategic change. Acad. Manag. J. 35, 91–121 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiersema, M., Bowen, H.: Foreign-based competition and corporate diversification strategy. Strateg. Manag. J. 26, 1153–1171 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, K.Y., O’Reilly, C.A.: Demography and diversity in organizations: a reviewof 40 years of research. Res. Org. Behav. 20, 77–140 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wroom, V.H., Pahl, B.: Relationship between age and risk-taking among managers. J. Appl. Psychol. 55, 399–405 (1971)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamak, S., Usdiken, B.: Economic liberalization and the antecedents of top management teams: evidence from Turkish ‘big’ business. Br. J. Manag. 17, 177–194 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Sannio, Benevento, Italy

    M. Carmen Díaz-Fernández, M. Rosario González-Rodríguez & Biagio Simonetti

Authors
  1. M. Carmen Díaz-Fernández
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. M. Rosario González-Rodríguez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Biagio Simonetti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Biagio Simonetti.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Díaz-Fernández, M.C., González-Rodríguez, M.R. & Simonetti, B. Top Management Teams’ demographic characteristics and their influence on strategic change. Qual Quant 49, 1305–1322 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-014-0053-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-014-0053-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation