Abstract
This study examines the institutional network structure of corporate social responsibility (CSR)-related stakeholders. Using two-mode network analyses, this study provides a broad picture of business strategies for hyperlink relationships in terms of CSR. It investigates (1) how CSR-related organizations are positioned in the global CSR system according to their organizational type and (2) which CSR missions are stressed in the CSR system. Results show that local non-profit organizations and intergovernmental and international organizations play key roles in the global CSR system. Among the CSR issues, environmental problems are pressing at the global level. Compared with the CSR system in other regions, in the American CSR system, the role of organizations whose mission is diversity is magnified.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Agle, B.R., Mitchell, R.K.: Who matters to CEOs? An investigation of stakeholder attributes and salience, corporate performance and CEO values. Acad. Manag. J. 42(5), 507–526 (1999)
Bach, J., Stark, D.: Link, search, interact: the co-evolution of NGOs and interactive technology. Theory Culture Soc. 21(3), 101–117 (2004)
Barnett, G.A.: A longitudinal analysis of the international telecommunication network, 1978–1996. Am. Behav. Sci. 44, 1638–1655 (2001)
Barnett, G.A., Park, H.W.: The structure of international Internet hyperlinks and bilateral bandwidth. Ann. des Telecommun. 60(9–10), 1115–1132 (2005)
Barnett, G.A., Danowski, J.A., Richards, W.D.: Communication networks and network analysis: a current assessment. In: Richards, W.D., Barnett, G.A. (eds.) Prog. Commun. Sci., vol. 12, pp. 1–19. Ablex, Norwood, NJ (1993)
Barnett, G.A., Danowski, J.A., Feeley, T.H., Salker, J.: Measuring quality in communication doctoral education using student placement. J. Commun. 60, 388–411 (2010)
Bendheim, C.L., Waddock, S.A., Graves, S.B.: Determining best practice in corporate-stakeholder relations using data envelopment analysis. Bus. Soc. 37(3), 306–339 (1998)
Berger, I.E., Cunningham, P.H., Drumwright, M.E.: Mainstreaming corporate social responsibility: developing markets of virtue. California Management Review 49(4), (2007)
Berman, S.L., Wicks, A.C., Kotha, S., Jones, T.M.: Does stakeholder orientation matter? The relationship between stakeholder management models and the firm financial performance. Acad. Manag. J. 42(5), 488–509 (1999)
Borgatti, S.P., Everett, M.G.: Network analysis of 2-mode data. Soc. Netw. 19(3), 243–269 (1997)
Borgatti, S.P., Halgin, D.S.: Analyzing affiliation networks. LINKS Center for Social Network Analysis. Gatton College of Business and Economics. University of Kentucky, Lexington, http://www.steveborgatti.com/papers/bhaffiliations.pdf (2010)
Borgatti, S.P., Everett, M.G., Freeman, L.C.: UCINET for windows: software for social network analysis. (Version 6), Harvard, MA: Analytic Technologies (2002)
Chapple, W., Moon, J.: Corporate social responsibility in Asia: a seven country study of CSR website reporting. Bus. Soc. 44, 415–441 (2005)
Choi, J.H., Barnett, G.A., Chon, B.: Comparing world city networks: a network analysis of Internet backbone and air transport intercity linkages. Global Netw. 6(1), 81–99 (2006)
Daft, R.L., Steers, R.M.: Organizations: A Micro/Macro Approach. Scott Foresman, Glenview, IL (1986)
Deetz, S.A.: Democracy in an Age of Corporate Colonization: Developments in Communication and the Politics of Everyday Life. State University of New York Press, Albany (1992)
Esrock, S., Leichty, G.: Social responsibility and corporate web pages: self-presentation or agenda-setting? Pub. Relat. Rev. 24(3), 305–319 (1998)
Eweje, G., Palakshappa, N.: Business partnership with nonprofits: working to solve mutual problems in New Zealand. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 16, 337–351 (2009)
Fortune: Fortune Global 500 Companies (2008)
Glasbergen, P., Groenenberg, R.: Environmental partnerships in sustainable energy. Eur. Environ. 11, 1–13 (2001)
Jenkins, R.: Globalization, corporate social responsibility and poverty. Int. Aff. 81(3), 525–540 (2005)
Jones, E., Watson, B., Gardner, J., Gallois, C.: Organizational communication: challenges for the new century. J. Commun. 54, 750–772 (2004)
Kim, D., Nam, Y.: Corporate relations with environmental organizations represented by hyperlinks on the fortune global 500 companies’ websites. J. Bus. Ethics 105(4), 475–487 (2012)
Krackhardt, D.: QAP partialling as a test of spuriousness. Soc. Netw. 9, 171–186 (1987)
Lammers, J.C., Barbour, J.B.: An institutional theory of organizational communication. Commun. Theory 16, 356–377 (2006)
Lister, S.: NGO legitimacy: technical issue or social construct? Critique Anthropol. 2, 175–191 (2003)
Marcus, A., Geffen, D., Sexton, K.: Reinventing Environmental Regulation: Lessons From Projecct XL. Resources for the Future, Washington, DC (2002)
Matten, D., Moon, J.: “Implicit” and “explicit” CSR: a conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility. Acad. Manag. Rev. 33(2), 404–424 (2008)
Milliman, J., Grosskopf, J., Winter, V.: Enhancing environmental business and leadership skills: environmental dialogue sessions for EH&S professionals. Corp. Environ. Strategy 8(3), 209–216 (2001)
Mitchell, R.K., Agle, B.R., Wood, D.J.: Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: defining the principle of who and what really counts. Acad. Manag. Rev. 22(4), 853–886 (1997)
Murphy, D.F., Bendell, J.: Partners in Time? Business, NGOs, and Sustainable Development. United Nations Research Institute for Social Development, Geneva (1999)
Nam, Y., Barnett, G.A.: Globalization of technology: network analysis of global patents and trademarks. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 78(8), 1471–1485 (2011)
Nam, Y., Barnett, G.A., Kim, D.: Corporate hyperlink network relationships in global corporate social responsibility system. Qual. Quan. 48(3), 1225–1242 (2014)
Nijhof, A., Bruijn, T.D., Honders, H.: Partnerships for corporate social responsibility. Manag. Decis. 46(1), 152–167 (2008)
Ogden, S., Watson, R.: Corporate performance and stakeholder management: balancing shareholder and customer interests in the UK privatized water industry. Acad. Manag. J. 42(5), 526–538 (1999)
Ossewaarde, M., Nijhof, A., Heyse, L.: Dynamics of NGO legitimacy; how organizing betrays core missions of iNGOs. Pub. Admin. Devel. 28, 42–53 (2008)
Park, H.W.: Hyperlink network analysis: a new method for the study of social structure on the web. Connections 25(1), 49–61 (2003)
Park, H.W., Kim, C.S., Barnett, G.A.: Socio-communicational structure among political actors on the web in South Korea: the dynamics of digital presence in cyberspace. New Media Soc. 6(3), 403–423 (2004)
Post, J., Lawrence, A.T., Weber, J.: Business & Society. McGraw-Hill, New York (2003)
Rowley, T.J.: Moving beyond dyadic ties: a network theory of stakeholder influences. Acad. Manag. Rev. 22(4), 887–911 (1997)
Salisbury, J., Barnett, G.A.: The world system of international monetary flows: a network analysis. Inf. Soc. 15, 31–49 (1999)
Scott, J.: Social Network Analysis: A Handbook, 2nd edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA (2000)
Shumate, M., Dewitt, L.: The North/South divide in NGO hyperlink networks. J. Comput. Med. Commun. 13, 405–428 (2008)
Smurthwaite, M.: The purpose of the corporation. In: Williams, O.F. (ed.) Peace Through Commerce. University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame (2008)
UNEP: 2007 Annual report. United Nations Environment Program, Nairobi, Keyna (2007)
Vreelnad, R.: Law libraries in cyberspace: a citation analysis of world wide web sites. Law Librar. J. 92, 49–56 (2000)
Waddell, S.: Business-government-society collaborations: A brief review of key conceptual foundations. The Interaction Institute for Social Change, Boston, MA (2000)
Waddock, S.: Building a new institutional infrastructure for corporate responsibility. Acad. Manag. Perspect 22(3), 87–108 (2008)
Wasserman, S., Faust, K.: Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, NY (1994)
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by a Grant from the Kyung Hee University in 2013 (KHU-20130987)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nam, Y. Institutional network structure of corporate stakeholders regarding global corporate social responsibility issues. Qual Quant 49, 1063–1080 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-014-0035-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-014-0035-6