Advertisement

Quality & Quantity

, Volume 49, Issue 2, pp 541–557 | Cite as

Factors related with the university degree selection in Spanish public university system. An structural equation model analysis

  • Joan Guàrdia OlmosEmail author
  • Maribel Peró Cebollero
  • Antonio Hervás Jorge
  • Roberto Capilla Lladró
  • Pedro Pablo Soriano Jiménez
  • Manuel Porras Yañez
Article

Abstract

Students take into account different factors in their choice of university studies and college. Some are global, as the quality of the degree (ratio available places/firstchoice places in, cut-off grade, etc.), and others are subjective factors (e.g.: my friends are also taking this degree). In this work we present a partial multivariate model that takes into account the weight of the different variables shown by different works linked to this decision. We have studied three samples (\(n = 372\) from the Universidad Pablo de Olavide; \(n =\) 2,244 from the Universitat Politécnica de Valencia, and \(n = 543\) from the Universitat de Barcelona) from several degrees in the 2010–2011 and 2011–2012 academic years, all of them new students, coming from high school, and who had choosen these universities as first choice. The global effect shows that the structural model fits reasonably well in the three universities studied. Similarly, university and specialty models show different intensity effects, and we found that, in the case of Universitat Politécnica de Valencia (UPV) and Universitat de Barcelona (UB), they show higher intensity than in Universidad Pablo de Olavide (UPO). This makes us think that in most urban universities with a clear and regular offer of degrees (engineering in the case of UPV, and Health and Social Sciences in the case of UB), personal and social factors are more important than in the case of universities, as is the case of UPO, with an offer and dimension not yet completely defined.

Keywords

College selection Structural equation models University access Higher education management 

References

  1. Baker, S., Brown, B.: Images of excellence: constructions of institutional prestige and reflections in the university choice process. Br. J. Sociol. Educ. 28(3), 377–391 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Browne, M.W., Cudeck, R.: Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sociol. Methods Res. 21, 230–258 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Capilla, R.: Análisis estratégico de los estudios TIC en la Universidad Politécnica de Valencia. Tesis Doctoral no Publicada. Valencia: Universitat Politécnica de Valéncia. (2009). http://riunet.upv.es/handle/10251/5767. Retrieved 11 Mar 2014
  4. Ford, D.Y.: The underrepresentation of minority students in gifted education: problems and promises in recruitment and retention. J. Spec. Educ. 31(1), 4–14 (2008)Google Scholar
  5. Guàrdia, J., Peró, M., Hervás, A., Capilla, R., Soriano, P.P., Porras, M.: Factores asociados con la decisión de cursar estudios universitarios de Psicología. Una aproximación mediante modelos de ecuaciones estructurales. Anuario de Psicologia 42(1), 87–104 (2012)Google Scholar
  6. Guerra, C., & Rueda, E.M.: Estudio longitudinal de los jóvenes en el tránsito de la enseñza secundaria a la universidad: orientación, expectativas, toma de decisiones y acogida de los nuevos estudiantes en la universidad. Dirección General de Universidades. Estudios y Análisis (2005)Google Scholar
  7. Hu, L., Bentler, P.M.: Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct. Equ. Model. 6, 1–55 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Huang, Sh, Fang, N.: Predicting student academic performance in an enginnering dynamics course: a comparison for four types of predictive mathematical models. Comput. Educ. 61, 133–145 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Leppel, K., Williams, M.L., Waldauer, C.: The impact of parental occupation and socioeconomic status on choice of college major. J. Fam. Econ. Issues 22(4), 373–394 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Maringe, F.: University and course choice Implications for positioning, recruitment and marketing. Int. J. Educ. Manage. 20(6), 466–479 (2006)Google Scholar
  11. Muñiz, J.: Utilización de los test. En J. Muñiz, A.M. Fidalgo, E. García-Cueto, R. Martínez y R. Moreno (Eds.). Análisis de los ítems, (pp. 133–172). Madrid: La Muralla, S.A (2005)Google Scholar
  12. Murphy, P.E., McGarrity, R.A.: Marketing universities: a survey of student recruitment activities. Coll. Univ. 53(3), 249–261 (1978)Google Scholar
  13. Ory, D.T., Mokhtarian, P.L.: The impact of non-normality, sample size and estimation technique on goodness-of-fit measures in structural equation modeling: evidence from ten empirical models of travel behavior. Qual. Q. 44(3), 427–445 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Palomo, J., Dunson, D.B., Bollen, K.: Bayesian structural equation modeling. In: Lee, S.Y. (ed.) Handbook of Latent Variable and Related Models, pp. 163–179. Elsevier, New York (2007)Google Scholar
  15. Perna, L.W., Titus, M.A.: Understanding differences in the choice of college attended: the role of state public policies. Rev. High. Educ. 27(4), 501–525 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Poon, W.Y., Lee, S.Y.: A Distribution Free Approach for Analysis of Two-level Structural Equation Model. Elsevier, New York (1994)Google Scholar
  17. Price, I., Matzdorf, F., Smith, L., Agahi, H.: The impact of facilities on student choice of university. Facilities 21(10), 212–222 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Raymond, S.: Predicting academic succes of first-year engineering students from standardized test scores and psychological variables. Int. J. Eng. Educ. 17(1), 75–80 (2001)Google Scholar
  19. Turner, C.S.V., Thompson, J.R.: Socializing women doctoral students: minority and majority experiences. Rev. High. Educ. 6, 232–241 (1993)Google Scholar
  20. Veenstra, C.P., Dey, E.L., Herrin, G.D.: Is modeling of freshman engineering succes different from modeling of non-engineering succes? J. Eng. Educ. 97, 467–479 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Yurtseven, T.: How does the image of engineering affect student recruitment and retention? A perspective from the USA. Glob. J. Eng. Educ. 6(2), 267 (2002)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joan Guàrdia Olmos
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Maribel Peró Cebollero
    • 1
    • 2
  • Antonio Hervás Jorge
    • 3
  • Roberto Capilla Lladró
    • 3
  • Pedro Pablo Soriano Jiménez
    • 3
  • Manuel Porras Yañez
    • 4
  1. 1.Departament de Metodologia de les Ciéncies del Comportament, Facultat de PsicologiaUniversitat de BarcelonaBarcelonaSpain
  2. 2.Institut de Recerca en CervellCognició i Conducta (IR3C)BarcelonaSpain
  3. 3.Universitat Politécnica de ValenciaValenciaSpain
  4. 4.Universidad Pablo de OlavideSevillaSpain

Personalised recommendations