Quality & Quantity

, Volume 48, Issue 4, pp 1911–1927 | Cite as

Bowling alone but tweeting together: the evolution of human interaction in the social networking era

Article

Abstract

The objective of this paper is to theoretically analyze how human interaction may evolve in a world characterized by the explosion of online networking and other Web-mediated ways of building and nurturing relationships. The analysis shows that online networking yields a storage mechanism through which any individual contribution—e.g. a blog post, a comment, or a photo—is stored within a particular network and ready for virtual access by each member who connects to the network. When someone provides feedback, for example by commenting on a note, or by replying to a message, the interaction is finalized. These interactions are asynchronous, i.e. they allow individuals to relate in different moments, whenever they have time to. When the social environment is poor of participation opportunities and/or the pressure on time increases (for example due to the need to increase the working time), the stock of information and ties stored in the Internet can help individuals to defend their sociability.

Keywords

Internet Computer-mediated communication Online networking Facebook Social networks Social capital 

References

  1. Agarwal, R., Animesh, A., Prasad, K.: Social Interactions and the Digital Divide: Explaining Regional Variations in Internet Use. Information Systems Research. 20(2) (2009). doi:10.1287/isre.1080.0194
  2. Antoci, A., Sabatini, F., Sodini, M.: See you on Facebook! A framework for analyzing the role of computer-mediated interaction in the evolution of social capital. Journal of Socio-Economics 41, 541–547 (2012a)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Antoci, A., Sabatini, F., Sodini, M.: The Solaria Syndrome: Social Capital in a Growing Hyper-technological economy. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 81(3), 802–814 (2012b)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Antoci, A., Sabatini, F., Sodini, M.: Economic growth, technological progress and social capital: the inverted U hypothesis. Metroeconomica, in press (2013). doi:10.1111/meca.12007
  5. Bartolini, S., Bilancini, E., Pugno, M.: Did the decline in social capital decrease American happiness? A relational explanation of the happiness paradox. Social Indicators Research 110(3), 1033–1059 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bauernschuster, S., Falck, O., Woessmann, L.: Surfing Alone? The Internet and Social Capital: Evidence from an Unforeseeable Technological Mistake. SOEP WP. 392 (2011)Google Scholar
  7. Becchetti, L., Degli Antoni, G.: The sources of happiness: Evidence from the investment game. Journal of Economic Psychology 31(4), 498–509 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Becchetti, L., Pelloni, A., Rossetti, F.: Relational Goods, Sociability, and Happiness. Kyklos 61(3), 343–363 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bruni, L., Stanca, L.: Income Aspirations, Television and Happiness: Evidence from the World Values Survey. Kyklos 59(2), 209–225 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bruni, L., Stanca, L.: Watching alone: Relational goods, television and happiness. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 65, 506–528 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Burke, M., Settles, B.: Plugged in to the community: Social motivators in online goal-setting groups. C &T 2011: Fifth International Conference on Communities and Technologies (2011)Google Scholar
  12. Burke, M., Kraut, R., Marlow, C.: Social capital on Facebook: Differentiating uses and users. ACM CHI 2011: Conference on Human Factors in, Computing Systems (2011)Google Scholar
  13. Caplan, S.: Relations among loneliness, social anxiety, and problematic Internet use. Cyberpsychology and Behavior 10(2), 234–242 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chaim, F., Gandal, N.: Direct and Indirect Knowledge Spillovers: The ’Social Network’ of Open Source Projects. RAND Journal of Economics 42(1), 70–91 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Costa, D.L., Kahn, M.E.: Understanding the decline in social capital, 1952–1998. Kyklos 56, 17–46 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cummings, Jonathon N., Lee, John B., Kraut, Robert: Communication Technology and Friendship during the Transition from High School to College. In: Kraut, R., Brynin, M., Kiesler, S. (eds.) Computers, Phones and the Internet: Domisticating Information Technology, pp. 265–278. Oxford University Press, New York (2006)Google Scholar
  17. Demange, G.: Sharing information in Web communities. Games and Economic Behavior 68(2), 580–601 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Drouard, J.: Computer Literacy, Online Experience or Socioeconomic Characteristics - What are the Main Determinants of Internet Adoption and Internet Usage? Communications & Strategies 80(1), 83–104 (2010)Google Scholar
  19. Ellison, N.B., Steinfield, C., Lampe, C.: The benefits of Facebook friends: Social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 12, 1143–1168 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ellison, N.B., Steinfield, C., Lampe, C.: Connection strategies: Social capital implications of Facebook-enabled communication practices. New Media & Society 13(6), 873–892 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Franzen, A.: Social Capital and the Internet. Evidence from Swiss Panel Data. Kyklos 56(3), 341–360 (2003)Google Scholar
  22. Frey, B.S., Benesch, C., Stutzer, A.: Does watching TV make us happy? Journal of Economic Psychology 28, 283–313 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gaudel, A., Peroni, C.: Reciprocal attention and norm of reciprocity in blogging networks. Economics Bulletin 30(3), 1–18 (2010)Google Scholar
  24. Gershuny, J.: Web-use and net-nerds: A neo-functionalist analysis of the impact of information technology in the home. Social Forces 82(1), 141–168 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gil de Zúñiga, H., Jung, N., Valenzuela, S.: Social media use for news and individuals’ social capital, civic engagement and political participation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 17(3), 319–336 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Goldfarb, A., Prince, J.T.: Internet Adoption and Usage Patterns are Different: Implications for the Digital Divide. Information Economics and Policy 20(1), 2–15 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gui, B.: From transactions to encounters: the joint generation of relational goods and conventional values. In: Gui, B., Sugden, R. (eds.) Economics and social interaction: Accounting for interpersonal relations, pp. 23–51. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge UK (2005)Google Scholar
  28. Gui, B., Sugden, R.: Why Interpersonal Relations Matter for Economics. In: Gui, B., Sugden, R. (eds.) Economics and Social Interactions, Accounting for Interpersonal Relations, pp. 1–22. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (Mass) (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hamburger, Y.A., Ben-Artzi, E.: Loneliness and Internet use. Computers in Human Behavior 19, 71–80 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hamburger, Y.A., Hayat, Z.: The impact of the Internet on the social lives of users: A representative sample from 13 countries. Computers in Human Behavior 27, 585–589 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hampton, K., Wellman, B.: Neighboring in Netville: How the Internet Supports Community and Social Capital in a Wired Suburb. City & Community 2(4), 277–311 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Haythornthwaite, C.: Social networks and Internet connectivity effects. Information, Communication & Society 8, 125–147 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Katz, J., Rice, R.E., Apsden, P.: The Internet, 1995–2000: Access, Civic Involvement and Social Interaction. American Behavioral Scientist 45, 405–419 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kavanaugh, A., Carroll, J. M., Rosson, M. B., Zin, T. T., Reese, D. D.: Community networks: Where offline communities meet online. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. 10(4) (2005). article 3Google Scholar
  35. Kobayashi, T., Ikeda, K.: The effect of PC e-mail usage on social tolerance: Focusing on the mediating effect of communication with heterogeneous others. Research in Social Psychology 24(2), 120–130 (2008)Google Scholar
  36. Kraut, P., Patterson, M., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukopadhyay, T., Scherlis, W.: Internet paradox: a social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being? American Psychologist 53, 65–77 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kraut, R., Lundmark, V., Patterson, M., Kiesler, S., Mukopadhyay, T., McKenna, K.Y.A., et al.: Relationship formation on the internet: What’s the big attraction? Journal of Social Issues 58, 9–32 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Landqvist, F., Teigland, R.: Collective action in electronic networks of practice: An empirical study of three online social structures, Communities and technologies. In: Proceedings of the second communities and technologies conference Milano, Italy, 13–16 June, 2005Google Scholar
  39. Madden, M., Zickuhr, K.: 65% of online adults use social networking sites. Pew Internet & American Life Project, http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2011/Social-Networking-Sites.aspx (2011). Accessed 19 January 2013
  40. Matzat, U.: Academic communication and Internet Discussion Groups: transfer of information or creation of social contacts? Social Networks 26(2004), 221–255 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Matzat, U.: Reducing problems of sociability in online communities: Integrating online communication with offline interaction. American Behavioral Scientist 53(8), 1170–1193 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Miyata, K., Kobayashi, T.: Causal relationship between Internet use and social capital in Japan. Asian Journal of Social Psychology 11, 42–52 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Morahan-Martin, J., Schumacher, P.: Loneliness and social uses of the Internet. Computers in Human Behavior 19, 659–671 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Nie, N.H., Erbring, L.: Internet and society, a preliminary report, Stanford Institute for the Quantitative Study of Society, February 17, (2000)Google Scholar
  45. Nie, N.H., Sunshine Hillygus, D., Erbring, L.: Internet Use, Interpersonal Relations and Sociability: A Time Diary Study. In: Wellman, B., Haythornthwaite, C. (eds.) The Internet in Everyday Life, pp. 215–243. Blackwell, Oxford (2002)Google Scholar
  46. Park, N., Kee, K.F., Valenzuela, S.: Is There Social Capital in a Social Network Site?: Facebook Use and College Students’ Life Satisfaction, Trust, and Participation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 14(4), 875–901 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Paxton, P.: Is Social Capital Declining in the United States? A Multiple Indicator Assessment. The American Journal of Sociology 105(1), 88–127 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Pénard, T., Poussing, N.: Internet Use and Social Capital: The Strength of Virtual Ties. Journal of Economic Issues 44(3), 569–595 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Pénard, T., Poussing, N., Suire, R.: Does the internet make people happier? CEPS/INSTEAD Working Paper 2011/41 (2011)Google Scholar
  50. Putnam, R.D.: Bowling Alone. The Collapse and Revival of American Community. Simon & Schuster, New York (2000)Google Scholar
  51. Rainie, L., Purcell, K., Smith, A.: The Social Side of the Internet. Pew Internet & American Life Research Center, http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2011/The-Social-Side-of-the-Internet.aspx (2011). Accessed January 19, 2013
  52. Robinson, J.P., Martin, S.: IT and Activity Displacement: Behavioral Evidence from the U.S. General Social Survey (GSS). Social Indicators Research 91, 115–139 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Robinson, J.P., Martin, S.: IT use and declining social capital?: More cold water from the general social survey (GSS) and the american time-use survey (ATUS). Social Science Computer Review 28(1), 45–63 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Robinson, R.V., Jackson, E.F.: Is Trust in Others Declining in America? An Age-Period-Cohort Analysis. Social Science Research 30, 117–145 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Sabatini, F.: Can a click buy a little happiness? The impact of business-to-consumer e-commerce on subjective well-being. Economic and Econometrics Reserch Institute Research Paper \(2011\_\)12, Brussels (2011)Google Scholar
  56. Sheldon, P.: I’ll poke you. You’ll poke me! Self-disclosure, social attraction, predictability and trust as important predictors of Facebook relationships. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace. 3(2) (2009). article 1Google Scholar
  57. Steinfield, C., Ellison, N.B., Lampe, C.: Social capital, self-esteem, and use of online social network sites: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology 29(6), 434–445 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Stepanikova, I., Nie, N., He, X.: Time on the Internet, Loneliness and Life Satisfaction: Evidence from Panel Time-Diary Data. Computers in Human Behavior 26, 329–338 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Stern, M.J., Adams, A.: Do Rural Residents Really Use the Internet to Build Social Capital? An Empirical Investigation. American Behavioral Scientist 53(9), 1389–1422 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Subrahmanyam, K., Reich, S.M., Waechter, N., Espinoza, G.: Online and offline social networks: Use of social networking sites by emerging adults. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology 29, 420–433 (2008)Google Scholar
  61. Vergeer, M., Pelzer, B.: Consequences of media and Internet use for offline and online network capital and well-being. A causal model approach. Journal Of Computer-Mediated. Communication 15(1), 189–210 (2009)Google Scholar
  62. Wasko, M., Faray, S.: Why should i share? Examining social capital and knowledge contribution in electronic networks of practice. MIS Quarterly 29(1), 35–57 (2009)Google Scholar
  63. Zhang, W., Johnson, T.J., Seltzer, T., Bichard, S.L.: The Revolution Will be Networked. The Influence of Social Networking Sites on Political Attitudes and Behavior. Social Science Computer Review 28(1), 75–92 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche e AziendaliSassariItaly
  2. 2.Dipartimento di Economia e DirittoSapienza Università di RomaRomeItaly
  3. 3.Laboratory for Comparative Social ResearchNational Research University Higher School of EconomicsMoscowRussia
  4. 4.Dipartimento di Economia e ManagementUniversità di PisaPisaItaly

Personalised recommendations