Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Presenting dynamics of social phenomena: should we use absolute, relative or time differences?

  • Published:
Quality & Quantity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Empirical studies within social sciences face an important decision about how to express key findings to the target audience. Simplicity is an important selection criterion here, because the findings need to be conveyed in an efficient manner (i.e., briefly and concisely), but also because stakeholders (e.g., policy makers, the media, general public) are heterogeneous in their methodological backgrounds. The corresponding ways of measuring thus need to be not only exhaustive and message-delivering but also simple and intuitively understandable. This is particularly important when dynamics in time are discussed. There, most typically, either absolute or relative differences are used. This review paper critically elaborates these two popular measures and, in addition, discusses the alternatives of time distance and time step. The paper demonstrates that even in simple linear examples, the results of these four types of measures may sharply contradict. The empirical example of the digital divide is also elaborated, which illustrates many tempting possibilities for biased, one-sided interpretations that match the needs of certain stakeholders. Finally, the paper alerts users about possible misleading conclusions and suggests comprehensive treatments, using several measures simultaneously.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amiel Y., Cowell F.A.: Measurement of income inequality: experimental test by questionnaire. J. Public Econ. 47(1), 3–26 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, A.B., Brandolini, A.: Global world inequality: absolute, relative or intermediate? Paper prepared for the 28th general conference of the international association for research in income and wealth, Cork, Ireland, 22–28 August 2004. http://www.iariw.org (2004). Accessed 13 June 2012

  • Barzilai-Nahon K.: Gaps and bits: conceptualizing measurements for digital divide/s. Inf. Soc. 22(5), 269–278 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Best J.: Damned lies and statistics: untangling numbers from the media, politicians, and activists. University of California, Los Angeles (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  • Blastland M., Dilnot A.: The tiger that isn’t seeing through a world of numbers. Profile books Ltd, London (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewer J., Hunter A.: Foundations of multimethod research: synthesizing styles. Sage, Thousand Oaks (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruno G., Esposito E., Genovese A., Kholekile L.G.: A critical analysis of current indexes for digital divide measurement. Inf. Soc. 27, 16–28 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell S.: Flaws and fallacies in statistical thinking. University of Denver, Dover Publications Inc., Mineola (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  • Citrome L.: Relative vs. absolute measures of benefit and risk: what’s the difference?. Acta Psychiatr. Scand. 121, 94–102 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curcio F.R.: The effect of prior knowledge, reading and mathematics achievement, and sex on comprehending mathematical relationships expressed in graphs (Final Report). St. Francis College, Brooklyn (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  • Curcio F.R.: Comprehension of mathematical relationships expressed in graphs. J. Res. Math. Educ. 18, 382–393 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dehaene S., Dupoux E., Mehler J.: Is numerical comparison digital? Analogical and symbolic effects in two-digit number comparison. J. Exp. Psychol. 16(3), 62–642 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  • Dehaene S.: Precis of “The number sense”. Mind Lang. 16(1), 16–36 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dehaene S.: The number sense how the mind creates mathematics. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewan S., Riggins F.J.: The digital divide: current and future research directions. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 6(12), 298–337 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • Dolničar V., Vukčevič K., Kronegger L., Vehovar V.: Digitalni razkorak v Sloveniji. Druzboslovne razprave 18(40), 83–106 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  • Dolničar , V.: Merjenje dinamike digitalnega razkoraka: doktorska disertacija. Doctoral dissertation. Faculty of Social Sciences, Ljubljana (2007)

  • Dolničar V.: Merjenje dinamike digitalnega razkoraka. Faculty of Social Sciences, Ljubljana (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  • Dolničar, V. (2010) Regulating on an informed basis: an integrative methodological framework for monitoring the digital divide. In: Fortunati, L., Petrovčič, A. (eds.) Interacting with broadband society (Participation in broadband society, 1:227–255. P. Lang, Frankfurt am Main

  • Erbas A.K., Okur S.: Researching students’ strategies, episodes and metacognitions in mathematical problem solving. Qual. Quant. 46, 89–102 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friel S.N., Curcio F.R., Bright G.W.: Making sense of graphs: critical factors influencing comprehension and instructional implications. J. Res. Math. Educ. 32(2), 124–158 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huff D.: How to lie with statistics. Penguin Books, London (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  • Granger, C.W.J., Jeon, Y.: Measuring lag structure in forecasting models—the introduction of time distance. Economics Working Paper Series from Department of Economics University of California at San Diego (1999)

  • Granger C.W.J., Jeon Y.: Time-distance criterion for evaluating forecasting models. Int. J. Forecast. 19, 199–215 (2003a)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granger C.W.J., Jeon Y.: Comparing forecasts of inflation using time distance. Int. J. Forecast. 19, 339–349 (2003b)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harper S., Lynch J.: Methods for measuring cancer disparities: using data relevant to healthy people 2010 cancer-related objectives. National Cancer Institute, Washington (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilbert M.: When is cheap, cheap enough to bridge the digital divide? Modeling income related structural challenges of technology diffusion in Latin America. World Dev. 38(5), 756–770 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James J.: The digital divide across all citizens of the world: a new concept. Soc. Indic. Res. 89, 275–282 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James J.: From the relative to the absolute digital divide in developing countries. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 76, 1124–1129 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James J.: Penetration and growth rates of mobile phones in developing countries: an analytical classification. Soc. Indic. Res. 99, 135–145 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James J.: Are changes in the digital divide consistent with global equality or inequality?. Inf. Soc. 27, 121–128 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janvier C.: Use of situations in mathematics education. Educ. Stud. Math. 12, 113–122 (1981)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, J.: Lexical ambiguity in statistics: how students use and define the words: association, average, confidence, random and spread. J. Stat. Educ. 18(2):5–32

  • Menard S.: Longitudinal research. Sage, Thousand Oaks (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  • Milss T.C.: Forecasting compositional time series. Qual. Quant. 44, 673–690 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moser K., Frost C., Leon D.A.: Comparing health inequalities across time and place—rate ratios and rate differences lead to different conclusions: analysis of cross-sectional data from 22 countries 1991–2001. Int. J. Epidemiol. 36, 1285–1291 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mueller J.H., Schuessler K.F.: Statistical reasoning in sociology. Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston (1961)

    Google Scholar 

  • Nardo M.M., Saisana A., Tarantola S., Hoffman A., Giovannini E.: Handbook on constructing composite indicators: methodology and user guide. OECD Publishing, Paris (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumann W.L.: Research methods: qualitative and quantitative approaches, 6th edn. Pearson Education Inc., Boston (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris P.: Digital divide: civic engagement, information poverty, and the internet worldwide. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2001)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • OECD: Understanding the digital divide. OECD, Paris (2001)

  • OECD: Guide to measuring the information society. OECD, Paris (2009)

  • Pavlopoulos D., Muffels R., Vermunt J.K.: Wage mobility in Europe A comparative analysis using restricted multinomial logit regression. Qual. Quant. 444, 115–129 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter T.: Trust in numbers: the pursuit of objectivity in science and public life. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers E.: Diffusion of innovations, 1st edn. The Free Press, New York (1962)

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers E.: Diffusion of innovations, 5th edn. The Free Press, New York (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sciadas, G.: Unveiling the Digital Divide, Connectedness Series, No. 7. Statistics Canada. http://www.statcan.ca/english/research/56F0004MIE/56F0004MIE2002007.pdf (2002). Accessed 12 January 2011

  • Schield, M. et al.: Assessing statistical literacy: take CARE. In: Bidgood, P.Assessment methods in statistical education, pp. 133–152. Wiley, West Sussex (2010)

  • SIBIS. SIBIS Pocket book 2002/2003: Measuring the information society in the EU, the EU accession countries, Switzerland and the US. Bonn: SIBIS Project and European Communities. http://www.sibis-eu.org/publications/pocketbook.htm (2003). Accessed 11 January 2012

  • Sicherl P.: As a dynamic measure of disparities in social and economic development. Kyklos 26(3), 559–575 (1973)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sicherl P.: S-distance as a measure of time dimension of disparities. In: Mlinar, Z., Teune, H. (eds.) The social ecology of change, Sage, London (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sicherl, P. : Time distance measure in economic modelling. International Symposium on Economic Modelling. University of London, London (1997)

  • Sicherl P. (1998) Time distance in economics and statistics: concept, statistical measure and examples. In: Ferligoj, A. (ed.) Advances in methodology, data analysis and statistics, Metodološki zvezki 14, pp. 101–111. Faculty of Social Sciences, Ljubljana

  • Sicherl P.: Analysis of information society indicators with time distance methodology. J. Comput. Inf. Technol. 13(4), 293–298 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sicherl P.: The inter-temporal aspect of well-being and societal progress. Soc. Indic. Res. 84(2), 231–247 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sicherl, P.: What happened with the implementation of the Lisbon targets? Lessons to be learned about transparency and co-ordination. Dostopno prek http://www.gaptimer.eu/ (2010). Accessed 23 February 2010

  • Sicherl P.: New understanding and insights from time-series data based on two generic measures: S-Time-Distance and S-Time-Step. OECD Statistics Working Papers. OECD Publishing, Paris (2011)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Svedberg P.: World income distribution: which way?. J. Dev. Stud. 40(5), 1–32 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Dijk J., Hacker K.: The digital divide as a complex and dynamic phenomenon. Inf. Soc. 19(4), 315–326 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Dijk J.A.G.M.: The deepening divide: inequality in the information society. Sage, Thousand Oaks (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • Vehovar V., Sicherl P., Hüsing T., Dolničar V.: Methodological challenges of digital divide measurements. Inf. Soc. 22, 279–290 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson J., Callingham R.: Statistical literacy: a complex hierarchical construct. Stat. Educ. Res. J. 2(2), 3–46 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wild C.J., Pfannkuch M.: Statistical thinking in empirical enquiry. Int. Stat. Rev. 67(3), 223–265 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Ljubljana, Kardeljeva ploščad 5, 1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia

    Katja Prevodnik & Vasja Vehovar

Authors
  1. Katja Prevodnik
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Vasja Vehovar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Katja Prevodnik.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Prevodnik, K., Vehovar, V. Presenting dynamics of social phenomena: should we use absolute, relative or time differences?. Qual Quant 48, 799–816 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-012-9803-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-012-9803-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation