Quality & Quantity

, Volume 47, Issue 3, pp 1793–1801 | Cite as

Gender differences in macroeconomic expectations: evidence from Turkey



The aim of this study is to examine how men and women’s expectations differ about macroeconomic outlook. We examine whether there exist similarities or differences in men and women’s macroeconomic expectations. For this paper, 365 of Turkey’s leading business economists, strategists, portfolio managers and industry managers participated in a survey titled “Economic Expectations in Turkey for 2010.” The survey investigates gender differences in regards to four macroeconomic expectations; namely, inflation, unemployment, growth and exports. The survey participants are first classified according to their gender, and then their economic perceptions are analyzed. Initially, Kolmogorov–Smirnov statistics are implemented to test normality of data. Then, the Chi-square test of independence is used to compare macroeconomic expectations of men and women. The empirical findings show that macroeconomic expectations of males and females are not statistically different for inflation, unemployment, and exports. On the other hand, macroeconomic expectations of males and females are statistically different only for economic growth at a 10% level. The results indicate that gender is not one of the main determinants for macroeconomic expectations.


Gender difference Macroeconomic expectations Risk aversion 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Anselmi D.L., Law A.L.: Questions of Gender. McGraw Hill, New York (1998)Google Scholar
  2. Atkinson S.M., Baird S.B., Frye M.B.: Do female mutual fund managers manage differently?. J. Financ. Res. 26, 1–18 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bellucci A., Borisov A., Zazzaro A.: Does gender matter in bank—firm relationships? Evidence from small business lending. J. Bank. Financ. 34, 2968–2984 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bernasek A., Shwiff S.: Gender, risk, and retirement. J. Econ. Issues 35, 56–345 (2001)Google Scholar
  5. Buss D.: Sex differences in human mate preferences: evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behav. Brain Sci. 12, 1–49 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Buss D.: The evolution of desire: strategies of human mating. Basic Books, New York (1994)Google Scholar
  7. Carroll, C. D.: The Epidemiology of Macroeconomic Expectations, NBER Working Papers 8695. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge (2001)Google Scholar
  8. Carver R.H., Nash J.G.: Doing Data Analysis with SPSS: Version 16.0. Duxbury Press, Pacific Grove (2008)Google Scholar
  9. Charness G., Gneezy U.: Portfolio choice and risk attitudes: an experiment. Econ. Inq. 48(1), 133–146 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Corder G.W., Foreman D.I.: Nonparametric Statistics for Non-Statisticians: A Step-by-Step Approach. Wiley Press, New York (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Deaux K.: Sex and gender. Ann. Rev. Psychol. 36, 49–81 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Deaux K., Farris E.: Attributing causes for ones own performance: the effects of sex, norms, and outcome. J. Res. Person. 11(1), 59–72 (1977)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Eagly A.H., Steffen V.J.: Gender stereotypes stem from the distribution of women and men into social roles. J. Person. Soc. Psychol. 46, 735–754 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Eckel C.C., Grossman P.J.: Forecasting risk attitudes: an experimental study using actual and forecast gamble choices. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 68, 1–17 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Estes R., Hosseini J.: The gender gap on wall street: an empirical analysis of confidence in investment decision making. J. Psychol. 122(6), 577–590 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Grable J., Lytton R.H.: Financial risk tolerance revisited: the development of a risk assessment instrument. Financ. Serv. Rev. 8, 163–181 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Harrison G.W., Lau M.I., Rutstrom E.E.: Estimating risk attitudes in Denmark: a field experiment. Scand. J. Econ. 109(2), 341–368 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Huang, J., Kisgen, D. J.: Gender and Corporate Finance, Working Paper. Boston College, Boston (2009)Google Scholar
  19. Jianakoplos N.A., Bernasek A.: Are women more risk averse?. Econ. Inq. 36, 620–630 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Keynes J.M.: The General Theory of Employment, Interest, and Money. Harcourt, Brace (1936)Google Scholar
  21. Kolmogorov A.: Sulla determinazione empirica di una legge di distribuzione. G. Inst. Ital. Attuari. 4, 83 (1933)Google Scholar
  22. Kumar A.: Self-selection and the forecasting abilities of female equity analysts. J. Account. Res. 48(2), 393–436 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Marques de Sa J.P.: Applied Statistics Using SPSS, STATISTICA, MATLAB and R. Springer, Berlin (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Morse W.C.: Risk taking in personal investments. J. Busi. Psychol. 13(2), 281–288 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Powell M., Ansic D.: Gender differences in risk behavior in financial decision making: an experimental analysis. J. Econ. Psychol. 18(6), 605–628 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Prince M.: Women, men, and money styles. J. Econ. Psychol. 14(1), 175–182 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Shiller R.J.: The Subprime Solution: How Today’s Global Financial Crisis Happened, and What to Do about It. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2008)Google Scholar
  28. Smirnov N.V.: Tables for estimating the goodness of fit of empirical distributions. Ann. Math. Stat. 19, 279 (1948)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Urdan T.C.: Statistics in Plain English. Psychology Press, East Sussex (2005)Google Scholar
  30. Wang P.: Brokers still treat men better than women. Money 23, 108–110 (1994)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of International Logistics ManagementIstanbul Kemerburgaz UniversityBagcilar, IstanbulTurkey
  2. 2.Department of Banking and FinanceOkan UniversityIstanbulTurkey

Personalised recommendations