Advertisement

Quality & Quantity

, Volume 47, Issue 2, pp 1085–1091 | Cite as

A social discount rate for Turkey

  • Ferda Halicioglu
  • Cevat Karatas
Article

Abstract

Social discount rate (SDR) is a very crucial policy parameter in public project appraisals due to its resource allocation impacts. If this rate is too high, future generations will face excess financial burden since distant cash flows will become negligible. If this rate is too low, ineffective projects are chosen creating an inefficient allocation of resources. This study estimates an SDR for Turkey using the social time preference rate (STPR) approach. The elasticity of the marginal utility consumption, which is the most important component of the STPR, is estimated econometrically from a demand for food approach during the period of 1980–2008. The overall result indicates that the SDR for Turkey is 5.06%. The European Union requires evaluation of the publicly supported commercial projects in terms of the SDR; hence the findings from this study can be used as a useful policy measurement for a full EU member candidate country, Turkey.

Keywords

Social discount rate Social time preference Project appraisal ARDL Turkey 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Azar A.S.: Measuring the US social discount rate. Appl. Financ. Econ. Lett. 3, 363–366 (2007)Google Scholar
  2. Cowell, F.A., Gardiner, K.: Welfare weights (STICERD). Research Paper, No. 20, London School of Economics (1999)Google Scholar
  3. Dickey D.A., Fuller W.A.: Likelihood ratio statistics for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Econometrica 49, 1057–1072 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Elliott G., Rothenberg T., Stock J.: Efficient tests for an autoregressive unit root. Econometrica 64, 813–836 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Engle R.F., Granger C.W.: Cointegration and error correction: representation, estimation and testing. Econometrica 55, 251–276 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. European Commission: Guide to Cost–Benefit Analysis of Investment Projects. DG Regional Policy (2002)Google Scholar
  7. Evans D.J.: A social discount rate for France. Appl. Econ. Lett. 11, 803–808 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Evans D.J.: The elasticity of marginal utility of consumption: estimates for 20 OECD countries. Fisc. Stud. 26, 197–224 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Evans D.J., Sezer H.: A time preference measure of the social discount rate for the UK. Appl. Econ. 34, 1925–1934 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Evans D.J., Sezer H.: Social discount rates for member countries of the European Union. J. Econ. Stud. 32, 47–59 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Feldstein M.S.: Opportunity cost calculations in cost–benefit analysis. Kyklos 18, 277–287 (1965)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fellner W.: Operational utility; the theoretical background and measurement. In: Fellner, W. (ed.) Ten Economic Studies in the Tradition of Irving Fisher, Wiley, New York (1967)Google Scholar
  13. Florio M.: Cost–benefit analysis and European Union cohesion fund: on the social cost of capital and labour. Reg. Stud. 40, 211–240 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kula E.: Derivation of social time preference rates for the US and Canada. Q. J. Econ. 99, 873–882 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kula E.: Estimation of a social rate of interest for India. J. Agric. Econ. 55, 91–99 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lopez, H.: The social discount rate: estimates for nine Latin American countries. Policy Research Papers, No. 4639, The World Bank (2008)Google Scholar
  17. Marglin S.A.: The opportunity cost of public investment. Q. J. Econ. 77, 95–111 (1963)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Narayan P.K.: The saving and investment nexus for China: evidence from cointegration tests. Appl. Econ. 37, 1979–1990 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Percoco M.: A social discount rate for Italy. Appl. Econ. Lett. 15, 73–77 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Pesaran M.H., Shin Y., Smith R.: Bounds testing approach to the analysis of level relationships. J. Appl. Econ. 16, 289–326 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Phillips P.C.B., Perron P.: Testing for a unit root in time series regression. Biometrika 75, 335–346 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ramsey F.P.: A mathematical model of theory of saving. Econ. J. 38, 543–559 (1928)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Spackman M.: Time preference and the cost of capital of government. Fisc. Stud. 25, 467–518 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Spackman, M.: Social discount rates for the European Union: an overview. Working Papers, No. 33, Department of Economics and Statistics, University of Milano (2006)Google Scholar
  25. Stern H.N.: Welfare weights and the elasticity of marginal utility of income. In: Artis, M., Norbay, R. (eds.) Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the Association of University Teachers of Economics, Blackwell, Oxford (1977)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EconomicsYeditepe UniversityIstanbulTurkey

Personalised recommendations