Abstract
Multilevel growth curve models are becoming invaluable in educational research because they model changes in student outcomes efficiently. The coding of the time variable in these models plays a crucial role as illustrated in this study for the case of a three-level quadratic growth curve model. This paper shows clearly how the choice of a time coding affects school effects estimates and their interpretation. A new definition for school effects for growth curve models with random intercepts and slopes is proposed. This study recommends that the choice of a time coding should not only be based on the ease of interpretation and model convergence but also on its consequences on the student status and growth parameter estimates. The current application illustrates that in general the school effects for student growth in well-being and language achievement in secondary school, are greater for student growth than for student status.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Biesanz J.C., Deeb-Sossa N., Aubrecht A.M., Bollen K.A., Curran P.J.: The role of coding time in estimating and interpreting growth curve models. Psychol. Methods 9, 30–52 (2004)
Curran P.J., Hussong A.M.: Structural equation modeling of repeated measures data: latent curve analysis. In: Moskowitz, D.S., Hershberger, S.L. (eds.) Modeling Intraindividual Variability with Repeated Measures Data, pp. 59–85. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah (2002)
Davis P., Scott A.: The effect of interviewer variance on domain comparisons. Surv. Methodol. 21, 99–106 (1995)
De Fraine B., Van Damme J., Onghena P.: A longitudinal analysis of gender differences in academic self-concept and language achievement. A multivariate latent growth curve approach. Contemp. Educ. Psychol. 32, 132–150 (2007)
De Fraine B., Van Landeghem G., Van Damme J., Onghena P.: An analysis of well-being in secondary school with multilevel growth curve models and multilevel multivariate models. Qual. Quant. 39, 297–316 (2005)
Duncan T.E., Duncan S.C., Strycker L.A.: An Introduction to Latent Variable Growth Curve Modeling: Concepts, Issues and Applications. Laurence Erlbaum, Mahwah (2006)
Fitzmaurice G.M., Laird N.M., Ware J.H.: Applied Longitudinal Analysis. Wiley, Hoboken (2004)
Garst, H.: Longitudinal research using structural equation modeling applied to studies of determinants of psychological well-being and personal initiative in East Germany after the unification. Doctoral dissertation, University of Amsterdam (2000)
Goldstein H.: Multilevel Models in Educational and Social Research. Oxford University Press, New York (1995)
Hoffman L.: Multilevel models for examining individual differences in within-person variation and covariation over time. Multivar. Behav. Res. 42, 609–629 (2007)
Kreft I.G.G., de Leeuw J., Aiken L.S.: The effects of different forms of centering in hierarchical linear models. Multivar. Behav. Res. 30, 1–22 (1995)
Kwok O., West S.G., Green S.B.: The impact of misspecifying the within-subject covariance structure in multiwave longitudinal multilevel models: a Monte Carlo study. Multivar. Behav. Res. 42, 557–592 (2007)
Laird N., Ware J.: Random-effects models for longitudinal data. Biometrics 38, 963–974 (1982)
Lange N., Laird N.: The effect of covariance structure on variance estimation in balance growth-curve models with random parameters. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 84, 241–247 (1989)
May, H., Supovitz, J.A., Perda, D.: A longitudinal study of the impact of America’s choice on student performance in Rochester, New York, 1998–2003. Consortium for Policy Research in Education, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia (2004)
McArdle J.J.: Dynamic but structural equation modeling of repeated measures data. In: Nesselroade, J.R., Cattell, R.B. (eds.) Handbook of Multivariate Experimental Psychology, 2nd edn, Plenum, New York (1988)
Mehta P.D., West S.G.: Putting the individual back into individual growth curves. Psychol. Methods 5, 23–43 (2000)
Muthén L.K., Muthén B.O.: Statistical Analysis with Latent Variables: Mplus User’s Guide, 4th edn. Authors, Los Angeles (2006)
Rasbash J., Browne W., Goldstein H., Yang M.: A User’s Guide to MLwiN. Institute of Education, London (2000)
Raudenbush S.W.: The analysis of longitudinal, multilevel data. Int. J. Educ. Res. 13, 721–740 (1989)
Raudenbush S.W. : Statistical models for studying the effects of social context on individual development. In: Gottman, J. (ed.) The Analysis of Change, pp. 165–201. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale (1995)
Raudenbush S.W.: Comparing personal trajectories and drawing causal inferences from longitudinal data. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 50, 501–525 (2001a)
Raudenbush S.W.: Towards a coherent framework for comparing trajectories of individual change. In: Collins, L.M., Sayer, A.G. (eds.) New Methods for the Analysis of Change, pp. 35–64. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC (2001b)
Raudenbush S.W., Bryk A.S.: Hierarchical Linear Models. Applications and Data Analysis Methods, 2nd edn. Sage, London (2002)
Rogosa D.R.: Myths and methods: myths about longitudinal research, plus supplemental questions. In: Gottman, J.M. (ed.) The Analysis of Change, pp. 3–65. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah (1995)
Rogosa D.R., Willett J.B.: Understanding correlates of change by modeling individual differences in growth. Psychometrika 50, 203–228 (1985)
Rogosa D.R., Brandt D., Zimowski M.A.: growth curve approach to the measurement of change. Psychol. Bull. 90, 726–748 (1982)
SAS Institute Inc.: SAS User’s Guide: Statistics, 9th edn. SAS Institute Inc., Cary (2003)
Siddiqui O., Hedeker D., Flay B.R., Hu F.B.: Intraclass correlation estimates in a school-based smoking prevention study: outcome and mediating variables, by gender and ethnicity. Am. J. Epidemiol. 144, 425–433 (1996)
Singer J.D.: Using SAS proc mixed to fit multilevel models, hierarchical models, and individual growth models. J. Educ. Behav. Stat. 24, 323–355 (1998)
Singer J.D., Willett J.B.: Applied Longitudinal Data Analysis: Modeling Change and Event Occurrence. Oxford University Press, New York (2003)
Snijders T.A.B., Bosker R.J.: Multilevel Analysis: An Introduction to Basic and Advanced Multilevel Modelling. Sage, London (1999)
Spyros K.: Computing power of tests of the variance of treatment effects in designs with two levels of nesting. Multivar. Behav. Res. 43, 327–352 (2008)
Stoel R.D., Van den Wittenboer G.: Time dependence of growth parameters in latent growth curve models with time invariant covariates. Methods Psychol. Res. 8, 21–41 (2003)
Teddlie C., Reynolds D.: The International Handbook of School Effectiveness Research. Falmer Press, London (2000)
Tucker L.R.: Determination of Parameters of a Functional Relation by Factor Analysis. Psychometrika 23, 19–23 (1958)
Van Damme J., Opdenakker M.-C., Van Landeghem G., De Fraine B., Pustjens H., Vande gaer E.: Educational Effectiveness: An Introduction to International and Flemish Research on Schools, Teachers, and Classes. Acco, Leuven (2006)
Verbeke G., Molenberghs G.: Linear Mixed Models for Longitudinal Data. Springer Series in Statistics. Springer, New York (2000)
Wilkins J.L.M., Ma X.: Predicting student growth in mathematical content knowledge. J. Educ. Res. 95, 288–298 (2002)
Wilkins J.L.M., Ma X.: Modeling change in student attitude toward and beliefs about mathematics. J. Educ. Res. 97, 52–63 (2003)
Willett J.B.: Measuring change: what individual growth modeling buys you. In: Amsel, E., Renninger, K.A. (eds.) Change and Development: Issues of Theory, Method, and Application, pp. 213–243. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah (1997)
Willett J.B., Sayer A.G.: Using covariance structure analysis to detect correlates and predictors of individual change over time. Psychol. Bull. 116, 363–381 (1994)
Wishart J.: Growth rate determination in nutrition studies with bacon pig and their analysis. Biometrika 30, 16–28 (1938)
Yang M., Goldstein H., Heath A.: Multilevel models for repeated binary outcomes: attitudes and voting over the electoral cycle. J. R. Stat. Soc. A 163, 49–62 (2000)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Anumendem, N.D., De Fraine, B., Onghena, P. et al. The impact of coding time on the estimation of school effects. Qual Quant 47, 1021–1040 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-011-9581-3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-011-9581-3