Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Ways to promote valuable innovation: intellectual capital assessment for higher education system

  • Published:
Quality & Quantity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The importance of intellectual capital (IC) has been emphasized during recent year. Such a trend puts higher education systems under great pressure for two main reasons: first, IC has been shown to be a key driver of innovation; second, the higher education system assumes the unique function of fostering innovation. Knowing how best to improve IC is considered the most significant factor of success in enhancing innovation. However, the higher education system of today has difficulty in measuring IC precisely to improve its innovation performance. This study is to conquer such a problem by establishing critical criteria for IC assessment. Based on the findings, the higher education system is encouraged to successfully evaluate its IC performance and then find ways to improve this performance to achieve better innovation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abeysekera, I.: A framework to audit intellectual capital. J. Knowl. Manag. Pract. (online). 2, Aug (2001). http://www.tlainc.com/articl25.htm

  • Abeysekera I., Guthrie J.: Annual reporting trends of intellectual capital in Sri Lanka. Crit. Perspect. Account. 16(3), 151–163 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acs Z.J., Anselin L., Varga A.: Patents and innovation counts as measures of regional production of new knowledge. Res. Policy 31(7), 1069–1085 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amabile T.M., Kramer S.J.: Inner work life: understanding the subtext of business performance. Harv. Bus. Rev. 85(5), 72–83 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  • Arvidsson, S.: Demand and supply of information on intangibles—the case of knowledge-intensive Companies. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Lund: The Institute of Economic Research (2003)

  • Baxter R., Matear S.: Measuring intangible value in business-to-business buyer–seller relationships: an intellectual capital perspective. Ind. Mark. Manag. 33(6), 491–500 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beattie V.: Resources. Eur. Manag. J. 17(4), 15–27 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohn R.E.: Measuring and managing technological knowledge. Sloan Manag. Rev. 36(1), 61–73 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bornemann M., Leitner K.H.: Measuring and reporting intellectual capital: the case of a research technology organization. Singap. Manag. Rev. 24(3), 7–19 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosworth D., Rogers M.: Market value, R&D and intellectual property: an empirical analysis of large Australian firms. Econ. Rec. 77(239), 323–337 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brennan N.: Reporting intellectual capital in annual reports: evidence from Ireland. Audit. Account. J. 14(4), 423–436 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breton G., Taffler R.J.: Accounting information and analysts stock recommendation decisions: a content analysis approach. Account. Bus. Res. 31(2), 91–101 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bukh P.N., Nielsen C., Gormsen P., Mouritsen J.: Disclousure of information on intellectual capital in Danish IPO prospectuses. Account. Audit. Account. J. 18(6), 713–732 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caddy I.: Intellectual capital: recognizing both assets and liabilities. J. Intellect. Cap. 1(2), 129–146 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Canibano L., Sanchez M.P.: Measurement, management and reporting on intangibles. State of the art. In: Canibano, L., Sanchez, M.P. (eds) Readings on Intangibles and Intellectual Capital, pp. 81–113. AECA, Madrid (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen M.C.: Creativity comes from living field. J. Shih-Yu 456, 13–19 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • CNA.: Taiwan Breaking News. http://gov.cna.com.tw/ReadNews/FeatureNews_Read.aspx?TopicNo=86&ID=200901170227 (2009a). Accessed 8 Aug 2009

  • CNA.: Taiwan Breaking News.http://gov.cna.com.tw/ReadNews/FeatureNews_Read.aspx?TopicNo=86&ID=200901170030&pageNum=1 (2009b). Accessed 8 Aug 2009

  • Darroch J., McNaughton R.: Examing the link between knowledge management practices and types of innovation. J. Intellect. Cap. 3(3), 210–222 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davila T., Epstein M.J., Shelton R.: Making Innovation Work: How to Manage it, Measure it, and Profit from it. Pearson Education, Upper Saddle River (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  • Dempsey S.J., Gatti J.F., Grinell D.J., Cats-Baril W.L.: The use of strategic performance variables as leading indicators in financial analysts forecasts. J. Financ. Statement Anal. 2(4), 61–79 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  • Diefenbach T.: Different meanings of intangible assets and knowledge—and their implications for management and innovation. Int. J. Knowl. Cult. Change Manag. 4(5), 553–567 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  • Dzinkowski R.: The measurement and management of Intellectual capital: an introduction. Manag. Account. 78(2), 32–36 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  • Edvinsson L., Sullivan P.: Developing a model for managing intellectual capital. Eur. Manag. J. 14(4), 356–364 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Commission: The Role of Universities in the Europe of Knowledge. Commission of the European Communities, Brussels (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith J.K.: The New Industrial State. Harmonds worth, Penguin (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gambardella, A., Torrisi, S.: The economic value of knowledge and inter-firm technological linkages: an investigation of science-based firms. Dynamo TSER Project (contract no. SOE1-CT97-1078) (2000)

  • Gibbons, M.: Higher education relevance in the 21st century. Paper presented at the UNESCO World Conference on Higher Education, Paris, 1998, pp. 5–9

  • Guthrie J.: The management, measurement and the reporting of intellectual capital. J. Intellect. Cap. 2(1), 27 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guthrie, J., Petty, R.: Are companies thinking smart? Australian CPA, 2000, pp. 62–65 (2000a)

  • Guthrie J., Petty R.: Intellectual capital: Australian annual reporting practices. J. Intellect. Cap. 1(3), 241–251 (2000b)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, B.H.: Innovation and market value. NBER Working Paper, 6984, Cambridge (1999)

  • Hall L.A., Bagchi-Sen S.: A study of R&D, innovation, and business performance in the Canadian biotechnology industry. Technovation 22(4), 231–244 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, B.H., Jaffe, A., Trajtenberg, M.: Market value and patent citations: a first look. University of California at Berkeley, Department of Economics Working Paper, 0-277, Berkeley (2000)

  • Huang C.J., Liu C.J.: Exploration for the relationship between innovation, IT and performance. J. Intellect. Cap. 6(2), 237–252 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang J.J., Tzeng G.H., Ong C.S.: Multidimensional data in multidimensional scaling using the analytic network process. Pattern Recognit. Lett. 26, 755–767 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamath G.B.: The intellectual capital performance of Indian banking sector. J. Intellect. Cap. 8(1), 96–98 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, R.S., Norton, D.P.: Using the Balanced Scorecard as a strategic management system. Harv. Bus. Rev. 74, 75–85 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin C.J., Wu W.W.: A causal analytical method for group decision-making under fuzzy environment. Expert Syst. Appl. 34(1), 205–213 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liou J.H., Tzeng G.H., Chang H.C.: Airline safety measurement using a hybrid model. J. Air Transp. Manag. 13(4), 243–249 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marr, B. (eds): Perspective on Intellectual Capital: Multidisciplinary Insights into Management, Measurement, and Reporting. Elsevier, Boston (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • Momoh J.A., Zhu J.: Optimal generation scheduling based on AHP/ANP. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics—Part B. Cybernetics 33(3), 531–535 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  • Neely, A. (eds): Business Performance Measurement. Theory and Practice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ng A.W.: Reporting intellectual capital flow in technology-based companies. J. Intellect. Cap. 7(4), 492–500 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka I.: The knowledge-creating company. Harv. Bus. Rev. 69(6), 96–104 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka I., Takeuchi H.: The Knowledge-Creating Company. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD: From initial education to working life: making transitions work. OECD, Paris (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsson B.: Annual reporting practices: information about human resources in corporate annual reports in major Swedish companies. J. Hum. Resour. Cost. 6(1), 39–52 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  • Orens, R., Lyabert, N.: The use of non-financial information by financial analysts: a content analysis approach. Presented at the 27th Annual Congress of the European Accounting Association, Prague (2004)

  • Previs G.J., Bricker R.J., Robinson T.R., Young S.J.: A content analysis of sell-side financial analyst company reports. Account. Horiz. 8(2), 55–70 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers R.K., Grant J.: Content analysis of information cited in reports of sell-side financial analysts. J. Financ. Statement Anal. 3, 17–30 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  • Saaty J.T.: The Analytic Hierarchy Process. McGraw-Hill, Columbus (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez M.P., Elena S.: Intellectual capital in universities: improving transparency and internal management. J. Intellect. Cap. 7(4), 529–548 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez M.P., Elena S.: Intellectual capital in universities improving transparency and internal management. J. Intellect. Cap. 7(4), 529–539 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoenecker T., Swanson L.: Indicators of firm technological capability: validity and performance implications. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag. 49(1), 36–44 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sonnier B.M., Carson K.D., Carson P.P.: Accounting for intellectual capital: the relationship between profitability and disclosure. J. Appl. Manag. Entrep. 12(2), 3–14 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  • Subramaniam M., Youndt M.A.: The influence of intellectual capital on the types of innovative capabilities. Acad. Manag. J. 48(3), 450–463 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sumita T.: Intellectual assets based management for innovation: lessons from experiences in Japan. J. Intellect. Cap. 9(2), 206–277 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan H.P., Plowman D., Hancock P.: Intellectual capital and financial returns of companies. J. Intellect. Cap. 8(1), 76–95 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teece D.J.: Managing intellectual capital-Organizational, strategic, and policy dimensions. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  • Toivanen O., Stoneman P., Bosworth D.: Innovation and the market value of UK. Oxf. Bull. Econ. Stat. 64(39), 39–61 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tzeng G.H., Chiang C.H., Li C.W.: Evaluating intertwined effects in e-learning programs: a novel hybrid MCDM model based on factor analysis and DEMATEL. Expert Syst. Appl. 32(4), 1028–1044 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Buren, M.E.: Making knowledge counts: knowledge management systems and the human element. Unpublished manuscript, University of Missouri, Columbia (2000)

  • Van de Ven A.H., Angle H.L.: An introduction to the Minnesota innovation research program. In: Van de Ven, H.L., Scott-Poole, M. (eds) Research on the Management of Innovation: The Minnesota Studies, pp. 3–30. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  • Weatherly L.A.: The value of people: the challenges and opportunities of human capital measurement and reporting. Res. Q. 123, 1–11 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu H.Y., Chen J.K., Chen I.S.: Innovation capital indicator assessment of Taiwanese universities: a hybrid fuzzy model application. Expert Syst. Appl. (2009). doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2009.06.045

  • Yang Y.P., Shieh H.M., Leu J.D., Tzeng G.H.: A novel hybrid MCDM model combined with DEMATEL and ANP with applications. Int. J. Oper. Res. 5(3), 160–168 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu R., Tseng G.H.: A soft computing method for multi-criteria decision making with dependence and feedback. Appl. Math. Comput. 180(1), 63–75 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeng, J.Y., Gu, Y.C.: The relationship between intellectual capital and corporate intangibles: manufacturing in Taiwan. J. Manag. Syst. 11(1), 1–30 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to I-Shuo Chen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wu, HY., Chen, JK. & Chen, IS. Ways to promote valuable innovation: intellectual capital assessment for higher education system. Qual Quant 46, 1377–1391 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-011-9451-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-011-9451-z

Keywords

Navigation