Abstract
The paper proposed focuses on the unit-nonresponse in the IAB (Institute for Employment Research) Establishment Panel, a comprehensive data set describing the employer side of the labour market in Germany. Every year since 1993 (1996) the IAB Establishment Panel has surveyed the same establishments from all branches and different size categories in western (eastern) Germany. Although great efforts are taken to convince the owner/manager to take part in the survey there are always firms that do not answer the questionnaire. In this paper the authors try to find out why some establishments are not willing or able to respond to the questionnaire. If the respondent has the authority to provide relevant information, is able to give reliable answers to the questions with a justifiable amount of effort and is interested in the survey in business terms, participation is less frequently refused. The results also confirm the central significance of the interaction between the respondent and the interviewer. If one of the two individuals changes, the probability of further participation falls clearly.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bellmann, L., Caliendo, M., Hujer, R., Rodrigues, P.: Item-Antwortausfälle im IAB-Betriebspanel: Modellansätze und ökonometrische Schätzung am Beispiel der Bruttolohn- und Gehaltssumme. Beitrag zur 1. Nutzerkonferenz zu den Daten der BA und des IAB, 15. und 16. Juli 2005 (2005)
Fischer, G., Janik, F., Müller, D., Schmucker, A.: The IAB establishment panel—things users should know. In: Schmollers Jahrbuch. Zeitschrift für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften, Jg. 129, H. 1, S. 133–148 (2009)
Groves R.M., Couper M.P.: Contact-level influences on cooperation in face-to-face surveys. J. Off. Stat. 12(1), 63–83 (1996)
Groves R.M., Couper M.P.: Nonresponse in Household Interview Surveys. Wiley, USA (1998)
Groves R.M., Fowler F.J. Jr., Couper M.P., Lepkowski J.M., Singer E., Tourangeau R.: Survey Methodology. Wiley, Hoboken (2004)
Hartmann, J., Kohaut, S.: Analysen zu Ausfällen (Unit-Nonresponse) im IAB-Betriebspanel. In: Mitteilungen aus der Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung, Jg. 33, H. 4, S. 609–618 (2000)
Lipps, O.: Attrition in the Swiss Household Panel. In: Methoden–Daten–Analysen. 1. Jg., Heft 1, S. 45–68 (2007)
Pickery J., Loosveldt G., Carton A.: The effects of interviewer and respondent characteristics response behavior in panel surveys: a multilevel approach. Sociol. Methods Res. 29, 509–523 (2001)
Rendtel, U.: Attrition in household panels: a survey. CHINTEX Working Paper #4 (2002)
Schnabel, A.: Teilnahmeverhalten bei Unternehmensbefragungen. In: Arbeit, 6. Jg. Heft 2, S. 154–172 (1997)
Schnell R., Hill P.B., Esser E.: Methoden der empirischen Sozialforschung. Oldenbourg, München (2005)
Schreyögg, G., Koch, J., Sydow, J.: Routinen und Pfadabhängigkeit. In: Schreyögg, Georg; von Werder, Axel (Hg.): Handwörterbuch Unternehmensführung und Organisation. Stuttgart: Schäffer-Poeschel, S. 1295–1304 (2004)
Tomaskovic-Devey D., Leiter J., Thompson S.: Item nonresponse in organizational surveys. Sociol. Methodol. 25, 77–110 (1995)
Willimack D.K., Nichols E., Sudman S.: Understanding unit and item nonresponse in business surveys. In: Groves, R.M., Dillman, D.A., Eltinge, J.L., Little, R.J.A. (eds) Survey Nonresponse, pp. 213–227. Wiley, New York (2002)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Janik, F., Kohaut, S. Why don’t they answer? Unit non-response in the IAB establishment panel. Qual Quant 46, 917–934 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-011-9436-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-011-9436-y