Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Computer-assisted analysis of public discourse: a case study of the precautionary principle in the US and UK press

  • Published:
Quality & Quantity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Content analysis of newspaper publications has become a major scientific method of the analysis of public discourse. Within the framework of content analysis, we suggest a computer-assisted method to extract the most important topics of this discourse in an objective, quantifiable manner. The method combines frequency and proximity analysis of the text population, selection of the key words, text modification based on a key word dictionary, factor analysis of the modified text population, and factor interpretation. We illustrate the concept by applying the method to study the major topics discussed in the US and UK prestige press that relate to the precautionary principle. Precautionary principle is a concept of preventing environmental damage under scientific uncertainty. The analysis demonstrates the difference between the major topics of the precautionary principle discussion in the US and UK press. In the US, it revolves around an emphasis on the action on global warming, international trade on genetically modified food, environment pollution, the risks of new technologies, and cost-benefit analysis (CBA). In the UK, the major discussion topics include threats to agriculture and farmers, climate change economics, national and EU regulations, and commercial fishing. Other discussion topics, such as health and pollution, water safety regulations, meat safety and trade, and GMO regulations are shared between the countries. The US sample demonstrates more negative views towards the precautionary principle, which is presented as a threat to the US economic interests.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ackerman F.: Poisoned for Pennies. The Economics of Toxic and Precaution. Island Press, Washington, DC (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexa M., Zuell C.: Text analysis software: commonalities, differences and limitations: the results of a review. Qual. Quant. 34, 299–321 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andsager J.L.: How interest groups attempt to shape public opinion with competing news frames. Journal. Mass Commun. Q. 77(3), 577–592 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andsager J.L., Drzewiecka J.A.: Desirability of differences in destinations. Ann. Tour. Res. 29(2), 401 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashford N.A.: The legacy of the precautionary principle in US Law: the rise of cost-benefit analysis and risk assessment as undermining factors in health, safety, and environmental protection. In: de Sadeleer, N. (eds) Implementing the Precautionary Principle: approaches from the Nordic Countries, EU and USA, pp. 352–378. Earthscan, London (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  • Audit Bureau of Circulations, http://www.accessabc.com (2009). Accessed 1 Feb 2010

  • Beder S.: Environmental Principles and Policies, An Interdisciplinary Introduction. Earthscan Publications, Sterling, VA (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  • Boykoff M.T.: Flogging a dead norm? Newspaper coverage of anthropogenic climate change in the United States and United Kingdom from 2003–2006. Area 39, 470–481 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boykoff M.T., Boykoff J.M.: Balance as bias: global warming and the US prestige press. Glob. Environ. Change 14, 125–136 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brace N., Kemp R., Snelgar R.: SPSS for Psychologists: a guide to data analysis using SPSS for windows. Palgrave Macmillan, New York (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown T.A.: Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Applied Research. The Guilford Press, New York, NY (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y., Lehto, X.Y.: Brand personality of spa destinations (resorts) on the Web. In: proceedings of the 12th Annual Graduate Education and Graduate Students Research Conference on Hospitality and Tourism, pp. 911–919, Houston, TX, January 3–5, 2007

  • Commission of the European Communities: Communication from the Commission on the precautionary principle, European Union, Brussels (2000)

  • Deacon D.: Yesterday’s papers and today’s technology digital newspaper archives and ‘Push Button’ content analysis. Eur. J. Commun. 22, 5–25 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demont-Heinrich C.: American “prestige press” representations of the global hegemony of English. World Englishes 27, 161–180 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doerfel M.L., Marsh P.S.: Candidate-issue positioning in the context of presidential debates. J. Appl. Commun. Res. 31(3), 212–237 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Driesen D.M.: Economic dynamics of environmental law: cost-benefit analysis, emissions trading, and priority-setting. Boston College Environ. Aff. Law Rev. 31(1), 501–528 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  • Duriau, V.J., Reger, R.K.: Choice of text analysis software in organization research: insight from a multi-dimensional scaling (MDS) analysis. In: 7th International Conference on the Textual Data Statistical Analysis, March 10–12, pp. 382–389, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium, 2004

  • Duriau V.J., Reger R.K., Pfarrer M.D.: A content analysis of the content analysis literature in organization studies: research themes, data sources, and methodological refinements. Organ. Res. Methods 10(1), 5–34 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fenton, F.: The influence of newspaper presentations on the growth of crime and other anti-social activity. Am. J. Sociol. 16(3–4), 342–371, 538–564 (1910)

    Google Scholar 

  • Forsythe A.M.: Mapping the political language of the 1998 Good Friday Agreement. Qual. Quant. 23(3), 215–224 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  • George, A.L.: Propaganda analysis. A Study of Inferences Made from Nazi Propaganda in World War II, Row, Peterson, Evanston, IL (1959)

  • Grice J.W.: Computing and evaluating factor scores. Psychol. Methods 6, 430–450 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iker H.P.: An historical note on the use of word-frequency contiguities in content analysis. Comput. Humanit. 8, 93–98 (1974)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iker H.P., Harway N.I.: A computer approach towards the analysis of content. Behav. Sci. 10, 173–183 (1965)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, A., O’Riordan, T.: The Precautionary Principle in UK Environmental Law and Policy. Working Paper. http://www.uea.ac.uk/env/cserge/pub/wp/gec/gec_1994_11.htm(1994). Accessed 2 Jan 2010

  • Kline P.: An easy guide to factor analysis. Routledge, New York (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraidy M.M., Goeddertz T.: Transnational advertising and international relations: US press discourses on the Benetton ‘We on Death Row’ campaign. Media. Cult. Soc. 25, 147–165 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  • Krippendorff K.: Content analysis an introduction to its methodology. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacy S., Fico F., Simon T.F.: Fairness and balance in the prestige press. Journal. Q 68, 363–370 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LaFranchi S.: Surveying the precautionary principle’s ongoing global development: the evolution of an emergent environmental management tool. Boston College Environ. Aff. Law Rev. 32(3), 679–720 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • Landis J.R., Koch G.G.: The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33, 159–174 (1977)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lasswell H.D., Leites N.: Language of politics, studies in quantitative semantics. MIT Press, Cambridge (1965)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasswell H.D., Lerner D., Pool I.D.S.: The comparative study of symbols. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA (1952)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin H.S.: Hitler Youth and the Boy Scouts of America: a comparison of aims. Hum. Relat. 1, 206–227 (1947)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowe, W.: Content analysis software: a review. Technical report for the identity project. http://people.iq.harvard.edu/~wlowe/Publications/rev.pdf(2003). Accessed 1 Feb 2010

  • Luther C.A., Miller M.M.: Framing of the 2003 U.S.–Iraq war demonstrations: an analysis of news and partisan texts. Journal. Mass Commun. Q. 82(1), 78–96 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macnamara, J.: Media content analysis—uses, benefits, & best practice methodology. In: mMedia Monitors. http://www.mediamonitors.com.au/documents/Media%20Content%20Analysis%20Research%20Paper.pdf (2006). Accessed 4 Jan 2008

  • Martin H.: Nationalism and children’s literature. Libr. Q. 6, 405–418 (1936)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathews B.C.: A study of a New York daily. Independent 68, 82–86 (1910)

    Google Scholar 

  • Mattis, K.: The adoption of the precautionary principle in environmental policy: does american media bias undermine public and ecological health and environmental sustainability? Master’s thesis, University of North Dakota, Grand Forks, ND (2009)

  • Miles M.B., Weitzman E.A.: The state of qualitative content analysis software: what do we need?. Curr. Sociol. 44(3), 206–224 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller M.M., Andsager J.L., Riechert B.P.: Framing the candidates in presidential primaries: issues and images in press releases and news coverage. Journal. Mass Commun. Q. 75(2), 312–324 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muskens G.: Mathematical analysis of content. Qual. Quant. 19, 99–103 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myers N., Raffensperger C.: Precautionary Tools for Reshaping Environmental Policy. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  • Namenwirth J.Z.: Marks of distinction: a content analysis of British mass and prestige newspaper editorials. Am. J. Sociol. 74, 343–360 (1969)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neuendorf K.A.: The Content Analysis Guidebook. Sage, Thousand Oak, CA (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  • Neuman W.L.: Social Research Methods Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Allyn & Bacon, Needham Heights, MA (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  • Newbold C., Boyd-Barrett O., Van Den Bulck H.: The media book. Arnold Hodder Headline, London (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  • Pennings P., Keman H.: Towards a new methodology of estimating party policy positions. Qual. Quant. 36(1), 55–79 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Popping R.: Computer programs for the analysis of texts and transcripts. In: Roberts, C.W. (eds) Text analysis for the social sciences: methods for drawing statistical inferences from texts and transcripts., pp. 79–100. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  • Powers A., Andsager J.L.: How newspapers framed breast implants in the 1990s. Journal. Mass Commun. Q. 76(3), 551–564 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rampton S., Stauber J.: Trust us, We’re Experts!. Putman, New York, NY (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts C.W.: A conceptual framework for quantitative text analysis. Qual. Quant. 34, 259–274 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romano N.C. Jr., Donovan C., Chen H., Nunamaker J.F. Jr: A methodology for analyzing web-based qualitative data. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 19(4), 213–246 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  • Russill C.: The tipping point trend in climate change communication. Glob. Environ. Change 19, 336–344 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan C., Cave J.: Structuring destination image: a qualitative approach. J. Travel Res. 44(2), 143–150 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, G.E.: The negro in the Philadelphia press. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Pennsylvania (1934)

  • Sinclair K.: British prestige press editorials on leadership during 1979 campaign. Journal. Q. 59, 230–234 (1982)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Speed G.J.: Do newspapers now give the news?. Forum 15, 705–711 (1893)

    Google Scholar 

  • Stempel G.H., Windhauser J.W.: The prestige press revisited: coverage of the 1980 presidential campaign. Journal. Q. 61, 230–234 (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  • Stepchenkova S., Morrison A.M.: The destination image of Russia: from the online induced perspective. Tour. Manag. 27(5), 943–956 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stepchenkova S., Morrison A.M.: Russia’s destination image among American pleasure travelers: revisiting Echtner & Ritchie. Tour. Manag. 29(3), 548–560 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stepchenkova S., Chen Y., Morrison A.M.: China and Russia: organic destination images in US media. China Tour. Res. 3(1), 55–72 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  • Stepchenkova S., Kirilenko A., Morrison A.M.: Facilitating content analysis in tourism research. J. Travel Res. 47, 454–469 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stovall J.G.: The prestige press covers the 1960 presidential campaign. Journal. Q. 38, 157–163 (1961)

    Google Scholar 

  • Street, A.T.: The truth about newspapers. Chicago Tribune, July 25, 1909

  • Stryker J.E., Wray R.J., Hornic R.C., Yanovitzky I.: Validation of database search terms for content analysis. Journal. Mass Commun. Q. 83(2), 413–430 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tenney A.A.: The scientific analysis of the press. Independent 73, 895–898 (1912)

    Google Scholar 

  • Tesch R.: Qualitative Research: analysis types and software tools. Falmar Press, New York, NY (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  • Tickner, J., Raffensperger, C., Myers, N.: The Precuationary Principle in Action: a handbook. science and environmental health network. http://www.sehn.org/rtfdocs/handbook-rtf.rtf (1999). Accessed 4 Sept 2008

  • Treaty of Maastricht: declaration on Assessment of the Environmental Impact of Community Measures. http://www.europa.eu/legislation_summaries/economic_and_monetary_affairs/institutional_and_economic_framework/treaties_maastricht_en.htm(1991). Accessed 01 June 2010

  • UK Department for Environment, Food, and Rural Affairs: understanding Adaptation. http://www.defra.gov.uk/environment/climate/adaptation/index.htm(2010). Accessed 01 June 2010

  • UK Department of Energy and Climate Change: our energy future: creating a low-carbon economy Energy. White paper. http://www.decc.gov.uk/en/content/cms/publications/white_paper_03/white_paper_03.aspx (2003). Accessed 01 Feb 2010

  • United Nations Environment Programme: rio declaration on environment and development (1992)

  • van den Berg H., van der Veer K.: Computerized decision support systems and text analysis: evaluating CETA. Qual. Quant. 34(1), 65–86 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walworth A.: School histories at war, A study of the treatment of our wars in the secondary school history books of the United States and in those of its former enemies. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA (1938)

    Google Scholar 

  • Weaver D.A., Bimber B.: Finding news stories: a comparison of searches using LexisNexis and Google News. Journal. Mass Commun. Q. 85(3), 515–530 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber R.P.: Measurement models of content analysis. Qual. Quant. 17, 127–149 (1983)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber R.P.: Correlational models of content: reply to Muskens. Qual. Quant. 20(2–3), 273–275 (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells R.A., King E.G.: Prestige newspaper coverage of foreign affairs in the 1990 congressional campaign. Journal. Q. 71, 652–664 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, P.W.: Quarter century survey of press content shows demand for facts. Editor and Publisher, May 31 (1924)

  • Wickham M., Woods M.: Reflecting on the strategic use of CAQDAS to manage and report on the qualitative research process. Qual. Rep. 10(4), 687–702 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilcox D.F.: The American newspaper: a study in social psychology. Ann. Am. Acad. Polit. Soc. Sci. 16, 56–92 (1900)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woefel J.: CATPAC: Users guide. RAH Press: The Galileo Company, New York, NY (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodroom E.: Mainstreaming content analysis in the social science: methodological advantages, obstacles, and solutions. Soc. Sci. Res. 13(1), 1–19 (1984)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zuell, C., Landmann, J.: Computer-assisted content analysis without dictionary? In: The Sixth International Conference on Logic and Methodology (RC33)—Recent Developments and Applications in Social Research Methodology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2004

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Earth Systems Science and Policy, University of North Dakota, Stop 9011, Grand Forks, ND, 58202-9011, USA

    Andrei Kirilenko, Rebecca Romsdahl & Kristine Mattis

  2. The Department of Tourism, Recreation and Sport Management, University of Florida, P.O. Box 118208, Gainesville, FL, 32611-8208, USA

    Svetlana Stepchenkova

Authors
  1. Andrei Kirilenko
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Svetlana Stepchenkova
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Rebecca Romsdahl
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Kristine Mattis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrei Kirilenko.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kirilenko, A., Stepchenkova, S., Romsdahl, R. et al. Computer-assisted analysis of public discourse: a case study of the precautionary principle in the US and UK press. Qual Quant 46, 501–522 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-010-9383-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-010-9383-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation