Abstract
We scrutinize whether the consensus on economic justice prevailing in a society is shaped by institutions, especially by education systems. We argue that social cohesion is ensured by the magnitude of consensus on justice rather than its content. Thus, we take the magnitude of consensus as our dependent variable abstracting it from its content. We examine the impact of various institutions on this variable by using set-theory based arguments, bootstrapping and multivariate models. The findings suggest that the sense of justice in society is significantly shaped by the institutional characteristics of the education system.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alesina A., Angeletos G.M.: Fairness and redistribution. Am. Econ. Rev. 95(4), 960–980 (2005)
Alves W.M., Rossi P.H.: Who should get what? Fairness judgments of the distribution of earnings. Am. J. Sociol. 84(3), 541–564 (1978)
Breen R.: Explaining cross-national variation in youth unemployment: market and institutional factors. Eur. Sociol. Rev. 21(2), 125–134 (2005)
Brunello G., Checchi D.: Does school tracking affect equality of opportunity? New international evidence. Econ. Policy 22(52), 781–861 (2007)
Esping-Andersen G.: Hybrid or unique? The Japanese welfare state between Europe and America. J. Eur. Soc. Policy 7(3), 179–189 (1997)
Fong C.: Social preferences, self-interest, and the demand for redistribution. J. Public Econ. 82(2), 225–246 (2001)
Hall P.H., Soskice D.: Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2001)
Hanushek, E.A., Wössmann, L.: Does educational tracking affect performance and inequality? Differences-in-differences evidence across countries. National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) Working Paper, No. W11124 (2005)
Hermkens P.L.J., Boerman F.A.: Consensus with respect to the fairness of incomes: differences between social groups. Soc. Justice Res. 3(3), 201–215 (1989)
Homans G.C.: Social Behavior: Its Elementary Forms. Revised edition. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, New York (1974)
Jasso G.: Self-interest, distributive justice, and the income distribution: a theoretical fragment based on St. Anselm’s postulate. Soc. Justice Res. 3(3), 251–276 (1989)
Jasso G.: How much injustice is there in the World? Two new justice indexes. Am. Sociol. Rev. 64(1), 133–168 (1999)
Kunovich S., Slomczynski K.M.: Systems of distribution and a sense of equity: a multilevel analysis of meritocratic attitudes in post-industrial societies. Eur. Sociol. Rev. 23(5), 649–663 (2007)
Linos K., West M.: Self-interest, social beliefs, and attitudes to redistribution. Re-addressing the issue of cross-national variation. Eur. Sociol. Rev. 19, 393–409 (2003)
Marshall G., Swift A., Routh D., Burgoyne C.: What is and what ought to be: Popular beliefs about distributive justice in thirteen countries. Eur. Sociol. Rev. 23(5), 349–367 (1999)
Meyer J.W.: The effects of education as an institution. Am. J. Sociol. 83(1), 55–76 (1977)
Müller W., Gangl G.: Transitions from education to work in Europe: the integration of youth into EU labour markets. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2003)
Osberg L., Smeeding T.: Fair inequality? Attitudes toward pay differentials: the United States in comparative perspective. Am. Sociol. Rev. 71(3), 450–473 (2006)
Shavit Y., Müller W.: From school to work: a comparative study of educational qualifications and occupational destinations. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1998)
Van de Werfhorst, H.G., Mijs, J.J.B.: Achievement inequality and the institutional structure of educational systems: a comparative perspective. Ann. Rev. Sociol. 36, forthcoming (2010)
Wolbers M.H.J: Patterns of labour market entry: a comparative perspective on school-to-work transitions in 11 European countries. Acta Sociologica 50(3), 189–210 (2007)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Koçer, R.G., van de Werfhorst, H. Education systems and the formation of societal consensus on justice. Qual Quant 46, 451–470 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-010-9380-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-010-9380-2