Abstract
In a standardized personal interview, elderly (65+) Dutch respondents (N = 233), were asked detailed retrospective questions about six physical activities like walking, cycling and their performance of household tasks. Surprisingly, the proportion of inadequate answers was small, suggesting that the interviewers—four professional research nurses—have done their very best to eventually obtain adequate answers. They used three different types of control of the interview process. Firstly, an optimal execution of the prescribed ‘open loop control’, that is, precisely following the text of the questionnaire. Secondly, via the ‘feedback loop control’ of repair: if nevertheless inadequate answers are given, further probing is performed until eventually an adequate answer is obtained. Thirdly, by decomposing a general question into its components, making the question easier to answer (partial questioning). Interaction analysis of transcripts of the interviews showed that the type of control exercised by the interviewers, strongly differed by topic of the question. It appeared that question topics requiring more complex cognitive activities of the respondents, not only lead to more (need for) repair, but also to larger differences between the interviewers concerning their readiness to use partial questioning as an alternative for the open loop control as designed by the researcher.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Cannel C., Miller P., Oksenberg L.: Research on interviewing techniques. In: Leinhardt, S. (eds) Sociological Methodology 1981, pp. 389–437. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco (1981)
Deeg, D.J.H., Westendorp-de Serière, M. (eds.): Autonomy and well-being in the aging population. Report from the Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam 1992–1993. VU University Press, Amsterdam (1994)
Dijkstra W.: A new method for studying verbal interactions in survey-interviews. J. Off. Stat. 15, 67–85 (1999)
Dijkstra W.: Transcribing, coding and analysing verbal interactions in survey interviews. In: Maynard, D.W., Houtkoop, H., Schaeffer, N.C., van der Zouwen, J. (eds) Standardization and Tacit Knowledge; Interaction and Practice in the Survey Interview, pp. 401–425. Wiley, New York (2002)
Dijkstra W.: Question–answer sequence. In: Best, S.J., Radcliff, B. (eds) Polling America; An Encyclopedia of Public Opinion, pp. 612–616. Greenwood Press, Westport (2005)
Dijkstra W., Ongena Y.: Question–answer sequences in survey-interviews. Qual. Quant. 40, 983–1011 (2006)
Graafmans W.C., Bouter L.M., Lips P.: The influence of physical activity and fractures on ultrasound parameters in elderly people. Osteoporosis Int. 8, 449–454 (1998)
Groves R.M.: Survey Errors and Survey Costs. Wiley, New York (1989)
Groves R.M., Fowler F.J., Couper M.P., Lepkowski J.M., Singer E., Tourangeau R.: Survey Methodology. Wiley, Hoboken (2004)
Houtkoop-Steenstra, H.: Conversational problems in telephone survey interviews. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Survey Measurement and Process Quality, Bristol, April 1995, pp. 286–289. American Statistical Association, Alexandria VA (1995)
Hyman, H.H., Cobb, W.J., Feldman, J.J., Hart, C.W., Stember, C.H.: Interviewing in Social Research. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1954/1975)
Knaüper B., Belli R.F., Hill D.H., Herzog A.R.: Question difficulty and respondents’ cognitive ability: the effect on data quality. J. Off. Stat. 13, 181–199 (1997)
Knaüper B., Schwartz N., Park D.: Frequency reports across age groups. J. Off. Stat. 20(1), 91–96 (2004)
Moore R.J., Maynard D.W.: Achieving understanding in the standardized survey interview: repair sequences. In: Maynard, D.W., Houtkoop-Steenstra, H., Schaeffer, N.C., van der Zouwen, J. (eds) Standardization and Tacit Knowledge; Interaction and Practice in the Survey Interview, pp. 281–312. Wiley, New York (2002)
Ongena Y.P., Dijkstra W.: Methods of behavior coding of survey interviews. J. Off. Stat. 22(3), 419–451 (2006)
Rapoport A.: Two approaches to general system theory. In: Geyer, R.F., van der Zouwen, J. (eds) Dependence and Inequality, pp. 267–283. Pergamon Press, Oxford (1982)
Schaeffer N.C., Maynard D.W.: From paradigm to prototype and back again: interactive aspects of cognitive processing in standardized survey interviews. In: Schwarz, N., Sudman, S. (eds) Answering Questions: Methodology for Determining Cognitive and Communicative Processes in Survey Research, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco (1996)
Schwarz, N., Park, D., Knaüper, B., Sudman, S. (eds.): Cognition, Aging, and Self-Reports. Psychology Press, Philadelphia (1998)
Stel, V.: Prevention of fall accidents in older persons. From risk profile to intervention strategy. Unpublished dissertation, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (2003)
Stel V., Smit J.H., Pluijm S.M.F., Visser M., Deeg D.J.H., Lips P.: Comparison of the LASA physical activity questionnaire with a 7-day diary and pedometer. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 57, 252–258 (2004)
Tourangeau R.: Cognitive science and survey methods. In: Jabine, T., Straf, M., Tanur, J., Tourangeau, R. (eds) Cognitive Aspects of Survey Design: Building a Bridge Between Disciplines, pp. 73–100. National Academy Press, Washington (1984)
Tourangeau R., Rasinski K.: Cognitive processes underlying context effects in attitude measurement. Psychol. Bull. 103, 299–314 (1988)
Tourangeau R., Rips L.J., Rasinski K.: The Psychology of Survey Response. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2000)
van der Zouwen J., Smit J.H.: Control processes in survey interviews: a cybernetic approach. Kybernetes, Int. J. Syst. Cybern. 34(5/6), 602–616 (2005)
van der Zouwen J., Smit J.H.: Effective repair in survey interviews. Qual. Quant. 40, 245–258 (2006)
van der Zouwen, J., Smit, J.H., van der Horst, M.H.L.: Reporting the frequency and duration of household tasks by elderly respondents: the effect of different interview strategies on data quality. Proceedings of the 60th AAPOR Annual Conference, May 12–15, 2005, Miami Beach, FL, pp. 4007–4014. American Statistical Association, Alexandria [CD-ROM] (2005)
Wiener, N.: Cybernetics, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York (1948/1965)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
van der Zouwen, J., Smit, J.H. & Draisma, S. The effect of the question topic on interviewer behavior; an interaction analysis of control activities of interviewers. Qual Quant 44, 71–85 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-008-9181-z
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-008-9181-z