Quality & Quantity

, Volume 43, Issue 5, pp 743–755 | Cite as

Intention and behavior: a Bayesian meta-analysis with focus on the Ajzen–Fishbein Model in the field of environmental behavior

Original Paper

Abstract

We employ a Bayesian normal hierarchical model to investigate the relationship between intention and behavior as it is posited by Ajzen and Fishbein’s theory of planned behavior (TPB). Area of application is the field of environmental behavior. Eleven studies reporting correlations between intention and behavior were identified. Our Bayesian hierarchical model expects a correlation of rxy = 0.54 between those variables. This effect size is above average with regard to meta-analyses, which include other, non-environmental areas of application.

Keywords

Bayesian hierarchical model Meta-analysis Theory of planned behavior Ajzen–Fishbein 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ajzen, I.: The theory of planned behavior. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decision Process. 50, 179–211, p. 180 (1991)Google Scholar
  2. Baldi, P., Brunak, S.: Bioinformatics: The Machine Learning Approach. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA (2001)Google Scholar
  3. Bamberg, S., Hunecke, M., Blöbaum, A.: Moral Norm, Social Context and the Use of Public Transportation–Results of Two Field Studies. pp. 1–36 (2003)Google Scholar
  4. Bamberg, S., Hunecke, M., Blöbaum, A.: Social context, personal norms and the use of public transportation: two field studies. J. Environ. Psychol. 27(3), 190–203 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Davies, J., Foxall, G.R., Pallister, J.: Beyond the intention-behaviour mythology: An integrated model of recycling. Market. theory. 2(1), 29–113 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gelman, A., Carlin, J.B., Stern, H.S., Rubin, D.B.: Bayesian Data Analysis. Chapman & Hall, Section 5.5. (1995)Google Scholar
  7. Gilks, W.R., Richardson, S., Spiegelhalter, D.J. (eds.): Markov Chain Monte Carlo in Practice. CRC Press, Boca Raton (1995)Google Scholar
  8. Heath, Y., Gifford, R.: Extending the theory of planned behavior: predicting the use of public transportation. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 32, 2154–2189 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hedges, L.V., Olkin, I.: Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis. Academic Press (1985)Google Scholar
  10. Hedges, L.V.: Statistical considerations. In: Cooper, H., Hedges, L.V. (eds.) The Handbook of Research Synthesis. pp. 30–31 (1994)Google Scholar
  11. Higgins, J.P.T., Spiegelhalter, D.J.: Being septical about meta-analyses: a Bayesian perspective on magnesium trials in myocardial infarction. Int. J. Epidemiol. 31, 96–104 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jaynes, E.T.: Probability Theory with Applications in Science and Engineering: A Series of Informal Lectures. Fragmentary Edition. http://www.bayes.wustl.edu/etj/articles/mobil.pdf (1974)
  13. Jensen, F.V.: Bayesian Networks and Decision Graphs. Springer Verlag, New York (2001)Google Scholar
  14. Joireman, J.A., Lasane, T.P., Bennet, J., Richards, D., Solaimani, S.: Integrating social value orientation and the consideration of future consequences within the extended norm activation model of proenvironmental behavior. Br. J. Soc. Psychol. 40, 133–155 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kaiser, F.G., Gutscher, H.: The proposition of a general version of the theory of planned behavior: predicting ecological behavior. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 33(3), 586–603 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kaiser, F., Shimoda, T.: Responsibility as a predictor of ecological behaviour. J. Environ. Psychol. 19, 243–253 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kaiser, F., Wölfing, S., Fuhrer, U.: Environmental attitude and ecological behavior. J. Environ. Psychol. 19, 1–19 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Knussen, C., Yule, F., MacKenzie, J., Wells, M.: An analysis of interventions to recycle household waste: the roles of past behaviour, perceived habit, and perceived lack of facilities. J. Environ. Psychol. 24, 237–246 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Pearl, J.: Causality. Cambridge (2000)Google Scholar
  20. Rise, J., Thompson, M., Verplanken, B.: Measuring implementation intentions in the context of the theory of planned behavior. Scandinavian J. Psychol. 44, 87–95 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Schulze, R., Wittmann, W.W.: A meta-analysis of the theory of reasoned action and the theory of planned behavior: the principle of compatibility and multidimensionality of beliefs as moderators. In: Schulze, R., Holling, H., Böhning, D. (eds.) Meta-Analysis. New Developments and Applications in Medical and Social Sciences, p. 220 (2003)Google Scholar
  22. Spiegelhalter, D.J., Thomas, A., Best, N.G., Lunn, D.: WinBUGS Version 1.4 Users Manual. MRC Biostatistics Unit, Cambridge. URL http://www.mrc-bsu.cam.ac.uk/bugs/ (2003)
  23. Staats, H., Harland, P., Wilke, H.A.M.: Effecting durable change: a team approach to improve environmental behavior in the household. Environ. Behav. 36(3), 341–367 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Terry, D.J., Hogg, M.A., White, K.M.: The theory of planned behaviour: self-identity, social identity and group norms. Br. J. Soc. Psychol. 38, 225–244 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Warn, D.E., Thompson, S.G., Spiegelhalter, D.J.: Bayesian random effects meta-analysis of trials with binary outcomes: methods for the absolute risk difference and relative risk scales. Stat. Medi. 21, 1601–1623 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Marketing DepartmentGeothe-Universität FrankfurtFrankfurt/MainGermany
  2. 2.Faculty for Social and Cultural ScienceJustus Liebig University GiessenGiessenGermany

Personalised recommendations