Skip to main content
Log in

A fuzzy group decision-making approach in quality function deployment

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Quality and Quantity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Quality function deployment (QFD) is comprised of two major group decision-making processes. One is to collect the customer requirements from a group of customers, whereas the other is to determine the relationship between customer requirements and technical measures by a cross-functional team. Generally, different and/or even subjective opinions are quite often in a group decision-making process due to the limitations of experience and impreciseness. Obviously, the importance of each customer requirement and the relationship between customer requirements and technical measures are determined by a group of people with imprecision and vagueness. Under such circumstances, a fuzzy group decision-making approach can be applied in QFD to deal with a group decision-making process when the information is imprecise and fuzzy. Moreover, an example is provided as well as the computational steps to show this fuzzy group decision-making approach can be effectively used in QFD to make decisions with imprecision and vagueness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arrow, K.J.: Social choice and individual values, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York (1963)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bossert, J.L.: Quality Function Deployment, A Practitioner’s Approach. ASQC Quality Press, Milwaukee (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan, L.K., Wu, M.L.: Quality function deployment: a literature review. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 143, 463–497 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan, L.K., Wu, M.L.: Quality function deployment: a comprehensive review of its concepts and methods. Qual. Eng. 15(1), 23–25 (2002–2003)

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, H.-K., Chen, H.-Y., Wu, H.-H., Lin, W.-T.: TQM implementation in a healthcare and pharmaceutical logistics organization: the case of Zuellig Pharma in Taiwan. Total Qual. Manage. Bus. Excell. 15(9&10), 1171–1178 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clausing, D.: Total Quality Development: A Step-by-Step Guide to World-Class Concurrent Engineering. ASME Press, New York (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, L.: Quality Function Deployment: How to Make QFD Work for you

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubois, D., Prade, H.: Operations on fuzzy numbers. Int. J. Syst. Sci. 9(6), 613–626 (1978)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fung, R.Y.K., Popplewell, K., Xie, J.: An intelligent hybrid system for customer requirements analysis and product attribute targets determination. Int. J. Prod. Res. 36(1), 13–34 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, A., Hauser, J.: Voice of the customer. Mark. Sci. 12, 1–27 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gryna, F.M.: Quality planning and analysis: from product development through use. McGraw-Hill International Edition, New York (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  • Han, C.H., Kim, J.K., Choi, S.H.: Prioritizing engineering characteristics in quality function deployment with incomplete information: a linear partial ordering approach. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 91, 235–249 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hauser, J.R., Clausing, D.: The house of quality. Harv. Bus. Rev. 66(3), 63–73 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann, A., Gupta, M.M.: Introduction to Fuzzy Arithmetic. Van Nostrand, New York (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, K.-J., Moskowitz, D.A., Evans, G.: Fuzzy multicriteria models for quality function deployment. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 121, 504–518 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kondo, Y.: Customer satisfaction: how can I measure it?. Total Qual. Manage. Bus. Excell. 12(7&8), 867–872 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuo, T.-C., Wu, H.-H.: Green products development by applying grey relational analysis and green quality function deployment. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. 5(4), 229–238 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, R.J.: Fuzzy method in group decision making. Comput. Math. Appl. 38, 91–101 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liang, G.-S., Wang, M.-J.J.: A fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making approach for robot selection. Rob. Comput.-Integr. Manu. 10(4), 267–279 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nakamura, K.: Preference relations on a set of fuzzy utilities as a basis for decision making. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 20, 147–162 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramaswamy, R.: Design and Management of Service Processes: Keeping Customers for Life. Addison-Wesley Publication Company, MA (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, L.P.: Quality function deployment. Qual. Prog. 19(6), 39–50 (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan, K.C., Shen, X.X.: Integrating Kano’s model in the planning matrix of quality function deployment. Total Qual. Manag. 11(8), 1141–1151 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Temponi, C., Yen, J., Tiao, W.A.: House of quality: a fuzzy logic-based requirements analysis. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 117, 340–354 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vanegas, L.V., Labib, A.W.: A fuzzy quality function deployment (FQFD) model for deriving optimum targets. Int. J. Prod. Res. 39(1), 99–120 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, J.: Fuzzy outranking approach to prioritize design requirements in quality function deployment. Int. J. Prod. Res. 37(4), 899–916 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, H.-H.: Implementing grey relational analysis in quality function deployment to strengthen multiple attribute decision making processes. J. Qual. 9(2), 19–39 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, H.-H.: A comparative study of using grey relational analysis in multiple attribute decision making problems. Qual. Eng. 15(2), 209–217 (2002–2003)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, H.-H., Liao, A.Y.H., Wang, P.-C.: Using grey theory in quality function deployment to analyse dynamic customer requirements. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 24 (2004). DOI: 10.1007/s00170-003-1948-8

  • Yuan, Y.: Criteria for evaluating fuzzy ranking methods. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 44, 139–157 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh, L.A.: Fuzzy sets. Inf. Control 8, 338–353 (1965)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh, L.A.: The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning (I). Inf. Sci. 8, 199–249 (1975a)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh, L.A.: The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning (II). Inf. Sci. 8, 301–357 (1975b)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh, L.A.: The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning. Inf. Sci. 9, 43–80 (1976)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, M.: Fuzzy logic and optimization models for implementing QFD. Comput. Ind. Eng. 35, 237–240 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chin-Hung Liu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Liu, CH., Wu, HH. A fuzzy group decision-making approach in quality function deployment. Qual Quant 42, 527–540 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-007-9151-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-007-9151-x

Keywords

Navigation