Skip to main content
Log in

On measuring skewness and kurtosis

  • Research Note
  • Published:
Quality and Quantity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper considers some properties of measures of asymmetry and peakedness of one dimensional distributions. It points to some misconceptions of the first and the second Pearson coefficients, the measures of asymetry and shape, that frequently occur in introductory textbooks. Also it presents different ways for obtaining the estimated values for the coefficients of skewness and kurtosis and statistical tests which include them.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Blest D.C. (2003). A new measure of kurtosis adjusted for skewness. Aust. N. Z. J. Stat. 45: 175–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byers, R.H.: On the maximum of the standardized fourth moment. Working paper (2000)

  • Cramer H. (1957). Mathematical Methods of Statistics. Princeton University Press, Seventh Printing, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Agostino R.B., Belanger A. and D’Agostino R.B. (1990). A suggestion for using powerful and informative tests of normality. Am. Stat. 44: 316–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darlington R.B. (1970). Is kurtosis really ‘peakedness’. Am. Stat. 24: 19–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Carlo L.T. (1997). On the meaning and use of kurtosis. Psychol. Methods 2: 292–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyson F.J. (1943). A note on kurtosis. J. R. Stat. Soc. 106: 360–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher R.A. (1930). The moments of the distribution for normal samples of measures of departures from normality. Proc. R. Soc. London, Series A 130: 16–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geary R.C. (1947). Testing for normality. Biometrika 34: 209–242

    Google Scholar 

  • Gosset W.S. (1927). “Student” Errors of Routine Analysis. Biometrika 19: 151–164

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins K.D. and Weeks D.L. (1990). Tests for normality and measures of skewness and kurtosis: their place in research reporting. Educ. Psychol. Measure. 50: 717–729

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jarque C.M. and Bera A.K. (1987). A test for normality of observations and regression residuals. Int. Stat. Rev. 55: 163–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplansky I. (1945). A common error concerning kurtosis. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 40: 259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kendall M.G. and Stuart A. (1958). The Advanced Theory of Statistics, vol. 1. Charles Griffin, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson K. (1895). Contribution to the mathematical theory of evolution, II: Skew variation in homogenous material. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London 186: 343–414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearson E.S. and Hartley H.O. (1958). Biometrika Tables for Statisticians, vol. 1. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoyanov J.M. (1987). Counterexamples in Probability. John Wiley & Sons, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dragan Đorić.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Đorić, D., Nikolić-Đorić, E., Jevremović, V. et al. On measuring skewness and kurtosis. Qual Quant 43, 481–493 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-007-9128-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-007-9128-9

Keywords

Navigation