Skip to main content
Log in

The communion bridge to Six Sigma and process capability indices

  • Research Note
  • Published:
Quality and Quantity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Six Sigma has already become an efficient improvement technique adopted by a great number of enterprises. Numbers of Sigma has become a tool of measuring process capability in some enterprises. But some of enterprises still use process capability indices (PCIs) to measure the process capability. So numbers of Sigma and PCIs both can be used to measure the process capability. The paper will research the relationship between PCIs and numbers of Sigma. In bilateral specifications, the paper will research the relationship between the PCIs which are Cp, Cpk, Cpm and Cpmk, Spk and numbers of Sigma. In unilateral specifications, the paper will research the relationship between the PCIs which are Cpu and Cpl and numbers of Sigma. If supplier and buyer use different tools to measure the process capability, then the communion bridge to Six Sigma and PCIs can decrease the communicate noise.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Boyles R.A. (1994). Process capability with asymmetric tolerances. Commun. Stat. Simul. Comput. 23: 615–643

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan L.K., Cheng S.W. and Spiring F.A. (1988). A new measure of process capability: Cpm. J. Qual. Tech. 20(3): 162–175

    Google Scholar 

  • Juran J.M. (1974). Juran’s Quality Control Handbook, 3rd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kane V.E. (1986). Process capability indices. J. Qual. Tech. 18: 41–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Linderman K., Schroeder R.G., Zaheer S. and Choo A.S. (2003). Six Sigma: a goal-theoretic perspective. J. Oper. Manage. 21: 193–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pande P.S., Neuman R.P. and Gavanagh R.R. (2000). The Six Sigma Way. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearn W.L., Kotz S. and Johnson N.L. (1992). Distributional and inferential properties of process capability indices. J. Qual. Tech. 24: 216–231

    Google Scholar 

  • Tong J.P.C., Tsung F. and Yen B.P.C. (2004). A DMAIC approach to printed circuit board quality improvement. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Tech. 23: 523–531

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wyper B. and Harrison A. (2000). Deployment of Six Sigma methodology in human resource function: a case study. Total Qual. Manage. 11(4&5): 720–727

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. S. Chen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chen, K.S., Ouyang, L.Y., Hsu, C.H. et al. The communion bridge to Six Sigma and process capability indices. Qual Quant 43, 463–469 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-007-9123-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-007-9123-1

Keywords

Navigation