Advertisement

Quality & Quantity

, Volume 43, Issue 2, pp 185–196 | Cite as

Dilettantism in investigating the impact of the Internet on the wellbeing of the elderly

  • Lucy FirthEmail author
  • David Mellor
Article

Abstract

The surge of interest in the social impacts of the Internet has led information systems experts to apply methods and theories garnered from disciplines such as psychology and sociology. As researcher look across disciplines for methods and explanations of outcomes, they run the risk of researching badly. This may be because they are inexperienced in the theory or method, or because the theory or method is not entirely applicable to the context that challenges them. Thus, in the search for the novelty necessary to achieve publications, and given the lack of experience in applying information systems to issues beyond the corporate sphere, research that does not hold water is being undertaken. This is of particular interest because it is not necessarily being undertaken by the novice. The research reported here was undertaken by experienced researchers using experimental and interview methods with which they had experience in other disciplines (psychology and economics). However, the context of researching the impact of the Internet on the quality of life of first time users over the age of 65 was sufficiently different as to render the methods and possibly the theory inappropriate. This dilettantism must be recognized for what it is.

Keywords

Elderly Internet Quality of life 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bargh J.A. (2002). Beyond simple truths: The human-Internet interaction. J. Soc. Issues 58: 1–8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bower B. (1997). Social links may counter health risks: research on how social isolation affects mortality in older adults. Sci. News 152: 135 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cummins, R.A.: Comprehensive Quality of Life Scale – Adult Manual. Deakin University, School of Psychology, Melbourne (1998)Google Scholar
  4. Cummins R.A. (1998). The second approximation to an international standard of life satisfaction. Soc. Indic. Res. 43: 307–334 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cummins, R.A.: Normative life satisfaction: Measurement issues and a homeostatic model. Soc. Indic. Res. 64, 225–226Google Scholar
  6. Czaja S.J. and Lee C.C. (2003). The impact of the Internet on older adults. In: Charness, N. and Schaie, K.W. (eds) Impact of Technology on Successful Aging., pp 113–133. Springer Publishing Company, New York Google Scholar
  7. Findlay R.A. (2003). Interventions to reduce social isolation amongst older people: where is the evidence. Ageing and Society 23: 647–658 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Firth, L., Mellor, D.: The Internet and the elderly: a warning to policy makers. ITS Biennial Conference, Beijing (2006)Google Scholar
  9. Gardner, I., Brooke, E.,Ozanne, E.,Kendig, H.: Improving health and social isolation in the AustralianVeteran community. Department of Veterans’ Affairs, Canberra (1999)Google Scholar
  10. Gutzmann H. (2000). Diagnosis and therapy of depression in advanced age. Ther. Umsch. 57: 95–99 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Huelsman T.J., Munz D.C. and Nemanick R.C. Jr. (1998). Scales to measure four dimensions of dispositional mood: positive energy, tiredness, negative activation, and relaxation. Educ. Psychol. Meas. 58: 804–819 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Katz J. and Rice R. (2002). Social Consequences of Internet Use: Access, Involvement and Interaction. MIT press, Cambridge Google Scholar
  13. Lee R.M. and Robbins S.B. (1995). Measuring belongingness: The social connectedness and the social reassurance scales. J. Couns. Psychol. 42: 232–241 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Mott, S., Riggs, A.: Elderly People: Their Needs for and Participation in Social Interactions. Deakin University, Melbourne, Australia (1992)Google Scholar
  15. Nie, N.H., Erbring, L.: Internet and Society: A Preliminary Report. Stanford Institute for the Quantitative Study of Society, Stanford, CA (2000)Google Scholar
  16. Ogozalek V. (1991). The social impacts of computing: computer technology and the graying of America. Soc. Sci. Comput. Rev. 9: 655–666 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Rapagnani G. (2002). Suicide in the elderly. Rev. Med. Liege 57: 91–96 Google Scholar
  18. Rosenberg M. (1979). Conceiving the Self. Basic Books, New York Google Scholar
  19. Robinson J., DiMaggio P. and Hargittai E. (2003). New social suryvey perspectives on the digital divide. IT Soc. 1(5): 1–22 Google Scholar
  20. Scheier M.F. and Carver C.S. (1985). Optimism, coping and health: Assessment and implications of generalized outcome expectancies. Health Psychol. 4: 219–247 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Solomon R. and Peterson M. (1994). Successful aging: how to help your practice cope with change. Geriatrics 49(4): 41–49 Google Scholar
  22. Victor C., Scambler S., Bond J. and Bowling A. (2000). Being alone in later life: Loneliness, social isolation and living alone. Rev. Clin. Gerontol. 10: 407–417 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. White H., McConnell E., Clipp E., Branch L.G., Sloane R., Pieper C. and Box T.L. (2002). A randomized controlled trial of the psychosocial impact of providing Internet training and access to older adults. Aging Ment. Health 6: 213–221 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Whitbourne S.K. (2001). Adult Development and Aging: Biopsychosocial Perspectives. Wiley, New York Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Information SystemsUniversity of MelbourneMelbourneAustralia
  2. 2.School of PsychologyDeakin UniversityBurwoodAustralia

Personalised recommendations