Abstract
Although the Big Five Questionnaire for children (BFQ-C) (C. Barbaranelli et al., Manuale del BFQ-C. Big Five Questionnaire Children, O.S. Organizazioni, Firenze, 1998) is an ordinal scale, its dimensionality has often been studied using factor analysis with Pearson correlations. In contrast, the present study takes this ordinal metric into account and examines the dimensionality of the scale using factor analysis based on a matrix of polychoric correlations. The sample comprised 852 subjects (40.90% boys and 59.10% girls). As in previous studies the results obtained through exploratory factor analysis revealed a five-factor structure (extraversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness, emotional instability and openness). However, the results of the confirmatory factor analysis were consistent with both a four and five-factor structure, the former showing a slightly better fit and adequate theoretical interpretation. These data confirm the need for further research as to whether the factor ‘Openness’ should be maintained as an independent factor (five-factor model), or whether it would be best to omit it and distribute its items among the factors ‘Extraversion’ and ‘Conscientiousness’ (four-factor model).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aluja A., García O. and García L. (2002). A comparative study of Zuckerman’s three structural models for personality through the NEO-PI-R, ZKPQ-III-R, EPQ-RS and Goldberg’s 50 bipolar adjectives. Pers. Individ. Diff. 33: 713–725
Barbaranelli C., Caprara G. and Rabasca A. (1998). Manuale del BFQ-C Big Five Questionnaire Children. O.S. Organizazioni Speciali, Firenze
Barbaranelli C., Caprara G., Rabasca A. and Pastorelli C. (2003). A questionnaire for measuring the Big Five in late childhood. Pers. Individ. Diff. 34: 645–664
Bollen K. (1989). Structural Equations with Latent Variables. John Wiley, NY
Caprara J., Barbaranelli C., Borgogni L. and Perugini M. (1993). The big five questionnaire: a new questionnaire to assess the five-factor model. Pers. Individ. Diff. 15: 281–288
Carrasco M.A., Holgado F.P. and Del Barrio M.V. (2005). Dimensionalidad del cuestionario de los cinco grandes (BFQ-N) en población infantil española. Psicothema 17: 275–280
Del Barrio, M.V., Carrasco, M.A.: Personalidad y diferencias por sexo y edad. In: Proceedings of the Actas del II Congreso Nacional SEIDI, Barcelona, 23–26 April 2003a
Del Barrio, M.V., Carrasco, M.A.: Personalidad y emociones infantiles. In Abstracts of the 29th Interamerican Congress of Psychology, Lima, 13–18 July 2003b
Digman J.M. (1997). Higher order factors of the big five. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 73: 1246–1256
DiStefano C. (2002). The impact of categorization with confirmatory factor analysis. Struct. Equation Model. 9: 327–346
Dollan C.V. (1994). Factor analysis of variables with 2, 3, 4 and 7 response categories: A comparison of categorical variable estimators using simulated data. Br. J. Math. Stat. Psychol. 47: 309–326
Eysenck H.J. (1992). A reply to Costa and McCrae: P or A and C the role of theory. Pers. Individ. Diff. 13: 867–868
Goldberg L.R. (2001). Analyses of Digman’s child-personality data: derivation of big five factor scores from each of six samples. J. Pers 69: 709–743
Guilley W. and Uhlig G. (1993). Factor analysis and ordinal data. Education 114: 258–264
Jöreskog K.G. and Sörbom D. (1996). PRELIS 2: User’s Reference Guide. SSI, Chicago
Kampen J. and Swyngedouw M. (2000). The ordinal controversy revisited. Qual. Quant. 34: 87–102
Lamb M., Chiang S., Wessels H., Broberg A. and Hwang C. (2002). Emergence and construct validation of the Big Five factors in early childhood: a longitudinal analysis of their ontogeny in Sweden. Child Dev. 73: 1517–1524
Manly B. (2000). Multivariate Statistical Methods. CRC Press, Boca Raton
Markey P., Markey Ch., Tinsley B. and Ericksen A. (2002). A preliminary validation of preadolescents’ self-reports using the five factor model of personality. J. Res. Pers. 36: 173–181
Maydeu A. and D’Zurilla T.J. (1995). A factor analysis of the social problem-solving inventory using polychoric correlations. Eur. J. Psychol.Assess. 11: 98–107
McCrae, R.R., Costa, P.T. Jr.: Personality in Adulthood. New York (1990)
McCrae R.R. and Costa P.T. (1997). Personality trait structure as a human universal. Am. Psychol. 52: 509–516
Mervielde I., Buyst V. and Fruyt F. (1995). The validity of the Big Five as a model for teachers’ ratings of individual differences among children aged 4–12 years. Pers. Individ. Diff. 18: 525–534
Mervielde I. and De Fruyt F. (2000). The big five personality factors as a model for the structure of children’s peer nominations. Eur. J. Pers. 14: 91–106
Montag I. and Levin J. (1994). The five-factor personality model in applied settings. Euro. J. Pers. 8: 1–11
Muthén B. (1993). Goodness of fit with categorical and other non normal variables. In: Bollen, K.A. and Long, J.S. (eds) Testing Structural Equation Models., pp. 1. Sage, NP
Saggino A. (2000). The big three or the big five? A replication study. Pers. Individ. Diff. 28: 879–886
Scholte R. and De Bruyn E. (2004). Comparison of the giant three and the big five in early adolescents. Pers. Individ. Diff. 36: 1353–1371
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Holgado-Tello, F.P., Carrasco-Ortiz, M.Á., del Barrio-Gándara, M.V. et al. Factor analysis of the Big Five Questionnaire using polychoric correlations in children. Qual Quant 43, 75–85 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-007-9085-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-007-9085-3