Advertisement

Quality & Quantity

, Volume 43, Issue 1, pp 75–85 | Cite as

Factor analysis of the Big Five Questionnaire using polychoric correlations in children

  • F. Pablo Holgado-TelloEmail author
  • M. Ángel Carrasco-Ortiz
  • María Victoria del Barrio-Gándara
  • Salvador Chacón-Moscoso
Original Paper

Abstract

Although the Big Five Questionnaire for children (BFQ-C) (C. Barbaranelli et al., Manuale del BFQ-C. Big Five Questionnaire Children, O.S. Organizazioni, Firenze, 1998) is an ordinal scale, its dimensionality has often been studied using factor analysis with Pearson correlations. In contrast, the present study takes this ordinal metric into account and examines the dimensionality of the scale using factor analysis based on a matrix of polychoric correlations. The sample comprised 852 subjects (40.90% boys and 59.10% girls). As in previous studies the results obtained through exploratory factor analysis revealed a five-factor structure (extraversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness, emotional instability and openness). However, the results of the confirmatory factor analysis were consistent with both a four and five-factor structure, the former showing a slightly better fit and adequate theoretical interpretation. These data confirm the need for further research as to whether the factor ‘Openness’ should be maintained as an independent factor (five-factor model), or whether it would be best to omit it and distribute its items among the factors ‘Extraversion’ and ‘Conscientiousness’ (four-factor model).

Keywords

Polychoric correlations Big Five Personality Children 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aluja A., García O. and García L. (2002). A comparative study of Zuckerman’s three structural models for personality through the NEO-PI-R, ZKPQ-III-R, EPQ-RS and Goldberg’s 50 bipolar adjectives. Pers. Individ. Diff. 33: 713–725 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barbaranelli C., Caprara G. and Rabasca A. (1998). Manuale del BFQ-C Big Five Questionnaire Children. O.S. Organizazioni Speciali, Firenze Google Scholar
  3. Barbaranelli C., Caprara G., Rabasca A. and Pastorelli C. (2003). A questionnaire for measuring the Big Five in late childhood. Pers. Individ. Diff. 34: 645–664 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bollen K. (1989). Structural Equations with Latent Variables. John Wiley, NY Google Scholar
  5. Caprara J., Barbaranelli C., Borgogni L. and Perugini M. (1993). The big five questionnaire: a new questionnaire to assess the five-factor model. Pers. Individ. Diff. 15: 281–288 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carrasco M.A., Holgado F.P. and Del Barrio M.V. (2005). Dimensionalidad del cuestionario de los cinco grandes (BFQ-N) en población infantil española. Psicothema 17: 275–280 Google Scholar
  7. Del Barrio, M.V., Carrasco, M.A.: Personalidad y diferencias por sexo y edad. In: Proceedings of the Actas del II Congreso Nacional SEIDI, Barcelona, 23–26 April 2003aGoogle Scholar
  8. Del Barrio, M.V., Carrasco, M.A.: Personalidad y emociones infantiles. In Abstracts of the 29th Interamerican Congress of Psychology, Lima, 13–18 July 2003bGoogle Scholar
  9. Digman J.M. (1997). Higher order factors of the big five. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 73: 1246–1256 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. DiStefano C. (2002). The impact of categorization with confirmatory factor analysis. Struct. Equation Model. 9: 327–346 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dollan C.V. (1994). Factor analysis of variables with 2, 3, 4 and 7 response categories: A comparison of categorical variable estimators using simulated data. Br. J. Math. Stat. Psychol. 47: 309–326 Google Scholar
  12. Eysenck H.J. (1992). A reply to Costa and McCrae: P or A and C the role of theory. Pers. Individ. Diff. 13: 867–868 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Goldberg L.R. (2001). Analyses of Digman’s child-personality data: derivation of big five factor scores from each of six samples. J. Pers 69: 709–743 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Guilley W. and Uhlig G. (1993). Factor analysis and ordinal data. Education 114: 258–264 Google Scholar
  15. Jöreskog K.G. and Sörbom D. (1996). PRELIS 2: User’s Reference Guide. SSI, Chicago Google Scholar
  16. Kampen J. and Swyngedouw M. (2000). The ordinal controversy revisited. Qual. Quant. 34: 87–102 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lamb M., Chiang S., Wessels H., Broberg A. and Hwang C. (2002). Emergence and construct validation of the Big Five factors in early childhood: a longitudinal analysis of their ontogeny in Sweden. Child Dev. 73: 1517–1524 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Manly B. (2000). Multivariate Statistical Methods. CRC Press, Boca Raton Google Scholar
  19. Markey P., Markey Ch., Tinsley B. and Ericksen A. (2002). A preliminary validation of preadolescents’ self-reports using the five factor model of personality. J. Res. Pers. 36: 173–181 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Maydeu A. and D’Zurilla T.J. (1995). A factor analysis of the social problem-solving inventory using polychoric correlations. Eur. J. Psychol.Assess. 11: 98–107 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. McCrae, R.R., Costa, P.T. Jr.: Personality in Adulthood. New York (1990)Google Scholar
  22. McCrae R.R. and Costa P.T. (1997). Personality trait structure as a human universal. Am. Psychol. 52: 509–516 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mervielde I., Buyst V. and Fruyt F. (1995). The validity of the Big Five as a model for teachers’ ratings of individual differences among children aged 4–12 years. Pers. Individ. Diff. 18: 525–534 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mervielde I. and De Fruyt F. (2000). The big five personality factors as a model for the structure of children’s peer nominations. Eur. J. Pers. 14: 91–106 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Montag I. and Levin J. (1994). The five-factor personality model in applied settings. Euro. J. Pers. 8: 1–11 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Muthén B. (1993). Goodness of fit with categorical and other non normal variables. In: Bollen, K.A. and Long, J.S. (eds) Testing Structural Equation Models., pp. 1. Sage, NP Google Scholar
  27. Saggino A. (2000). The big three or the big five? A replication study. Pers. Individ. Diff. 28: 879–886 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Scholte R. and De Bruyn E. (2004). Comparison of the giant three and the big five in early adolescents. Pers. Individ. Diff. 36: 1353–1371 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • F. Pablo Holgado-Tello
    • 1
    Email author
  • M. Ángel Carrasco-Ortiz
    • 2
  • María Victoria del Barrio-Gándara
    • 2
  • Salvador Chacón-Moscoso
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Metodología de las Ciencias del Comportamiento, Facultad de PsicologíaUNEDMadridSpain
  2. 2.Departamento de Personalidad Evaluación y Tratamientos Psicológicos, Facultad de PsicologíaUNEDMadridSpain
  3. 3.Facultad de Psicología (Sevilla)Metodología Ciencias del ComportamientoSevillaSpain

Personalised recommendations