Skip to main content
Log in

Robust testing procedures of process locations

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Quality & Quantity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In many manufacturing and service industries, the quality department of the organization works continuously to ensure that the mean or location of the process is close to the target value. In order to understand the process, it is necessary to provide numerical statements of the processes that are being investigated. That is why the researcher needs to check the validity of the hypotheses that are concerned with some physical phenomena. It is usually assumed that the collected data behave well. However, sometimes the data may contain outliers. The presence of one or more outliers might seriously distort the statistical inference. Since the sample mean is very sensitive to outliers, this research will use the smooth adaptive (SA) estimator to estimate the population mean. The SA estimator will be used to construct testing procedures, called smooth adaptive test (SA test), for testing various null hypotheses. A Monte Carlo study is used to simulate the values of the probability of a Type I error and the power of the SA test. This is accomplished by constructing confidence intervals of the process mean by using the SA estimator and bootstrap methods. The SA test will be compared with other tests such as the normal test, t test and a nonparametric statistical method, namely, the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Also, the cases with and without outliers will be considered. For the right-skewed distributions, the SA test is the best choice. When the population is a right-skewed distribution with one outlier, the SA test controls the probability of a Type I error better than other tests and is recommended.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beran R. (1974) Asymptotically efficient adaptive rank estimates in location models. Ann. Stat. 2: 63–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beran R. (1978) An efficient and robust adaptive estimator of location. Ann. Stat. 6: 292–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchland, S.T.: Monte Carlo intervals. Department of Statistics Technical Report No 1. University of Aberdeen (1981)

  • Buckland S.T. (1982) A note on the fourier series model for analyzing line transact data. Biometrics 38: 469–477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buckland S.T. (1983) Monte Carlo methods for confidence interval estimation using the bootstrap technique. BIAS 10: 194–212

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckland S.T. (1985) Algorithm AS 214, calculation of Monte Carlo confidence intervals. Appl. Stat. 34: 294–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Efron B. (1979) Bootstrap methods: another look at the Jackknife. Ann. Stat. 7: 1–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Efron, B.: The Jackknife, the Bootstrap and Other Resampling Plans, Philadelphia. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (1982)

  • Han C., Hawkins D.L. (1994) A smooth adaptive estimator of the mean of a symmetric or asymmetric distribution. Commun. Statist. - Theory Meth. 23(1): 1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hájek J. (1962) Asymptotically most powerful rank-order tests. Ann. Math. Stat. 33: 1124–1147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hogg R.V. (1967) Some observations on robust estimation. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 62: 1179–1186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hogg R.V., Lenth R.V. (1984) A review of some adaptive statistical Techniques. Commun. Stat. – Theory Methods 13: 1551–1579

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stein, C.: Efficient nonparametric testing and estimation. Proceeding of the Third Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, vol. 1, pp. 187–196 (1956)

  • Stone C.J. (1975) Adaptive maximum likelihood estimates of a location parameter. Ann. Stat. 3: 267–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Eeden C. (1970) Efficiency-robust estimation of location. Ann. Math. Stat. 41: 172–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Li-Lin Ku.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ku, LL., Han, CP. Robust testing procedures of process locations. Qual Quant 42, 579–595 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-006-9059-x

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-006-9059-x

Keywords

Navigation