Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Simple, Efficient and Distribution-free Approach to Interaction Effects in Complex Structural Equation Models

  • Published:
Quality & Quantity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Structural equation models with mean structure and non-linear constraints are the most frequent choice for estimating interaction effects when measurement errors are present. This article proposes eliminating the mean structure and all the constraints but one, which leads to a more easily handled model that is more robust to non-normality and more general as it can accommodate endogenous interactions and thus indirect effects. Our approach is compared to other approaches found in the literature with a Monte Carlo simulation and is found to be equally efficient under normality and less biased under non-normality. An empirical illustration is included.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Algina J., Moulder B.C. (2001). A note on estimating the Jöreskog–Yang model for latent variable interaction using LISREL 8.3. Structural Equation Modeling 8: 40–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson T.W. (1984). An Introduction to Multivariate Statistical Analysis, 2nd edn. New York, Wiley

    Google Scholar 

  • Arminger G., Muthén B.O. (1998). A Bayesian approach to non-linear latent variable models using the Gibbs sampler and the Metropolis-Hastings algorithm. Psychometrika 63: 271–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arminger G., Sobel M.E. (1990). Pseudo maximum likelihood estimation of mean and covariance structures with missing data. Journal of the American Statistical Association 85: 195–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batista-Foguet J.M., Coenders G., Saris W.E. (2004a). A parsimonious approach to interaction effects in structural equation models: an application to consumer behavior. Working Papers d’ESADE 183: 1–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Batista-Foguet J.M., Coenders G., Saris W.E., Bisbe J. (2004b). Simultaneous estimation of indirect and interaction effects using structural equation models. Metodološki Zvezki 1: 163-184

    Google Scholar 

  • Bollen K.A., Paxton P. (1998). Interactions of latent variables in structural equation models. Structural Equation Modeling 5: 267–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boomsma A., Hoogland J.J. (2001). The robustness of LISREL modeling revisited. In: Cudeck R., du Toit S., Sörbom D. (eds), Structural Equation Modeling: Present and Future. Lincolnwood IL, Scientific Software International, pp. 139–168

    Google Scholar 

  • Bisbe J., Coenders G., Saris W.E., Batista-Foguet J.M. (2006). Correcting measurement error bias in interaction models with small samples. Metodološki Zvezki 3: 267–287

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen J., Cohen P. (1983). Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Hillsdale, Lawrence Erlbaum

    Google Scholar 

  • Conner M., Sparks P., Povey R., James R, Shepherd R,. Armitage C.J. (2002). Moderator effects of attitudinal ambivalence on attitude-behaviour relationships. European Journal of Social Psychology 32: 705–718

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cortina J.M., Chen G., Dunlap W.P. (2002). Testing interaction effects in LISREL: examination and illustration of the available procedures. Organizational Research Methods 4: 324–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis-Blake A., Broschak J.P., George E. (2003). Happy together? How using non standard workers affects exit, voice, and loyalty among standard employees. Academy of Management Journal 46: 475–485

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du Toit M., du Toit S. (2001). Interactive LISREL, User’s Guide. Chicago IL, Scientific Software International

    Google Scholar 

  • González M., Coenders G., Casas F. (in press). Using non-linear models for a complexity approach to psychological well-being. Quality and Quantity. DOI: 10.1007/s11135-006-9032-8.

  • Irwin J.R., McClelland G.H. (2001). Misleading heuristics and moderate regression models. Journal of Marketing Research 38: 100–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaccard J., Turrisi R., Wan C.K., (1990). Interaction Effects in Multiple Regression. Newbury Park CA, Sage

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaccard J., Wan C.K. (1995). Measurement error in the analysis of interaction effects between continuous predictors using multiple regression. Psychological bulletin 117: 348-357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaccard J., Wan C.K. (1996). Lisrel Approaches to Interaction Effects in Multiple Regression. Thousand Oaks CA, Sage

    Google Scholar 

  • Jöreskog K.G. (1998). Interactions and nonlinear modeling: issues and approaches. In: Schumacker R.E., Marcoulides G.A. (eds), Interactions and Nonlinear Effects in Structural Equation Models. Mahwah NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 239–250

    Google Scholar 

  • Jöreskog K.G., Yang F. (1996). Nonlinear structural equation models: the Kenny–Judd model with interaction effects. In: Marcoulides G.A., Schumacker R.E., (eds), Advanced Structural Equation Modeling. Mahwah NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 57–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenny D.A., Judd C.M. (1984). Estimating the non-linear and interactive effects of latent variables. Psychological Bulletin 96: 201–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein A., Moosbrugger H. (2000). Maximum likelihood estimation of latent interaction effects with the LMS method. Psychometrika 65: 457–474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li F., Harmer P., Duncan T.E., Duncan S.C., Acock A., Boles S. (1998). Approaches to testing interactions effects using structural equation modeling methodology. Multivariate Behavioral Research 33: 1–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh H.W., Wen Z., Hau K.T. (2004). Structural equation models of latent interactions: evaluation of alternative estimation strategies and indicator construction. Psychological Methods 9: 275–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathieu J.E., Tannenbaum S.I., Salas E. (1992). Influences of individual and situational characteristics on measures of training effectiveness. Academy of Management Journal 35: 828–847

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moulder B.C., Algina J. (2002). Comparison of methods for estimating and testing latent variable interactions. Structural Equation Modeling 9: 1–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muthén L.K., Muthén B.O. (2004). Mplus Statistical Analysis with Latent Variables User’s Guide 3rd edn. Los Angeles CA, Muthén and Muthén

    Google Scholar 

  • Newsom J.T., Prigerson H.G., Schulz R., Reynolds C.F. (2003). Investigating moderator hypotheses in aging research: statistical, methodological, and conceptual difficulties with comparing separate regressions. International Journal of Aging and Human Development 57: 119–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ping R.A. (1995). A parsimonious estimating technique for interaction and quadratic latent variables. Journal of Marketing Research 32: 336–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ping R.A. (1996). Latent variable interaction and quadratic effect estimation: A two step technique using structural equation analysis. Psychological Bulletin 119: 166–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reinecke J. (2002). Nonlinear structural equation models with the theory of planned behavior: Comparison of multiple group and latent product term analyses. Quality and Quantity 36: 93–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rigdon E.E., Schumacker R.E., Wothke W. (1998). A comparative review of interaction and nonlinear effects modeling. In: Schumacker R.E., Marcoulides G.A. (eds), Interactions and Nonlinear Effects in Structural Equation Models. Mahwah NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 1–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Saris W.E., Batista-Foguet J.M. & Coenders G. (in press): Selection of indicators for the interaction term in structural equation models with interaction. Quality and Quantity.

  • Satorra A. (1990). Robustness issues in structural equation modeling: a review of recent developments. Quality and Quantity 24: 367–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Satorra A., Bentler P.M. (1988). Scaling corrections for chi-square statistics in covariance structure analysis. ASA Proceedings of the Business and Economic Section. Alexandria VA, American Statistical Association, pp. 308–313

  • Satorra A., Bentler P.M. (1994). Corrections to test statistics and standard errors in covariance structure analysis. In: von Eye A., Clogg C. (eds), Latent Variables Analysis: Applications to Developmental Research. Thousand Oaks CA, Sage, pp. 399–419

    Google Scholar 

  • Schermelleh-Engel K., Klein A., Moosbrugger H. (1998). Estimating non-linear effects using a latent moderated structural equations approach. In: Schumacker R.E., Marcoulides G.A. (eds), Interactions and Nonlinear Effects in Structural Equation Models. Mahwah NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 203–238

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumacker R.E. (2002). Latent variable interaction modeling. Structural Equation Modeling 9: 40–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumacker R.E., Marcoulides G.A. (1998). Interactions and Nonlinear Effects in Structural Equation Models. Mahwah NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz S.H. (1997). Values and culture. In: Munro D., Carr S., Schumaker J. (eds), Motivation and Culture. New York, Routledge, pp. 69–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Wall M.M., Amemiya Y. (2000). Estimation for polynomial structural equation models. Journal of the American Statistical Association 95: 929–940

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wall M.M., Amemiya Y. (2001). Generalized appended product indicator procedure for nonlinear structural equation analysis. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics 26: 1–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang-Wallentin F., Jöreskog K.G. (2001). Robust standard errors and chi-squares for interaction models. In: Marcoulides G.A., Schumacker R.E. (eds), New Developments and Techniques in Structural Equation Modeling. Mahwah NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 159–171

    Google Scholar 

  • Yuan K.H., Bentler P.M. (2000). Three likelihood-based methods for mean and covariance structure analysis with nonnormal missing data. In: Sobel M.E., Becker M.P. (eds), Sociological Methodology 2000. Washington DC, American Sociological Association, pp. 165–200

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Economics, Faculty of Economics and Management, University of Girona, Montilivi Campus, E-17071, Girona, Spain

    Germà Coenders

  2. ESADE, Ramon Llull University, Barcelona, Spain

    Joan M. Batista-Foguet & Willem E. Saris

  3. Department of Sociology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    Willem E. Saris

Authors
  1. Germà Coenders
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Joan M. Batista-Foguet
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Willem E. Saris
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Germà Coenders.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Coenders, G., Batista-Foguet, J.M. & Saris, W.E. Simple, Efficient and Distribution-free Approach to Interaction Effects in Complex Structural Equation Models. Qual Quant 42, 369–396 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-006-9050-6

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-006-9050-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation