Skip to main content
Log in

Fuzzy Decision Making for Market Positioning and Developing Strategy for Improving Service Quality in Department Stores

  • Published:
Quality & Quantity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Conventionally designed questionnaires frequently use the Likert Scale to gauge the feeling of respondents. The dichotomy and the same interval integer are clear-cut. Owing to the fuzziness of human thinking, this approach is inadequate and too simple to rule subject’s way and measure complex human thinking and cognition. Consequently, this investigation integrated the five dimensions of SERVQUAL and adopted a Fuzzy set theory based approach. The five criteria of SERVQUAL were tested for four department stores using Fuzzy set theory to clarify the positioning of service quality in the department store market and propose implementation priorities for different service strategies. This result permits managers to collate the service strategy of the benchmarking department store and its local competitors, and also enables department store decision-makers to consider the weights of the five dimensions when modifying the service strategy. The analytical results can be used to improve strategy development, and to devise superior and more effective management methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andrea R. (1997). Linking organizational effectiveness, key success factors and measures: an analytical framework. Management Accounting Research 8: 207–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asan U., Erhan B.C., Seckin P. (2004). A fuzzy approach to qualitative cross impact analysis. The International Journal of Management Science (Omega)32: 443–458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen L.H. Weng M.C. (2002). Using fuzzy approaches to evaluate quality alternative based on quality costs. The International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management 19(2): 122–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cronin, J. J. Taylor, S. A. (1992). Measuring service quality: a reexamination and Journal of Marketing 56(July): 55–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronin, J. J. Taylor, S. A. (1994). SERVPERF Versus SERVQUAL: reconciling and perceptions-minus-expectations measurement of service quality. Journal of Marketing 58(January): 125–131

    Google Scholar 

  • Dabholkar P.A., Thorpe D.I. Rentz J.O. (1996). A measure of service quality for retail stores: scale development and validation. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 24(1): 3–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dubois D., Prade H. (1978). Operations on fuzzy number. International Journal of Science 9(6): 13–626

    Google Scholar 

  • Ham C.L. (2003). Analyzing the value of service quality management: gaining advantages. International Journal of Value-Based Management 16: 131–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsiao S.W. (1998). Fuzzy logic based decision model for product design. International Journal of Ergonomics 21: 103–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hwang C.L. Yoon K. (1981). Multiple Attribute Decision Making, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems. Berlin, Springer

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahraman C., Ufuk C., Ziya U. (2003). Multi-criteria supplier selection using fuzzy AHP. Logistics Information Management 16(6): 382–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, Shu-Chen, Liang G.-S., Ye K.-D. (2005). A survey investigation of airports as centers: a strategic advantage perspective. International Journal of Managemaet 22(3): 396–414

    Google Scholar 

  • Michael D.C., Lucie K.O., Wlater L.L. (2001). Patients’ perceptions of service dimensions: an empirical examination of health care in NEW Zealand. Health Marketing Quarterly 19(1): 3–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prascevic, Z. Petrovic-Lazarevic, S. (1998). Fuzzy multiple objective decision making in the construction industry. Monash University, Department of Management, working paper, pp. 90–98.

  • Parasuraman A., Zeithaml V.A., Berry L. (1985). A conceptual model of service quality and its implications for future research. Journal of Marketing 49: 41–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parasuraman A., Zeithamal V.A., Berry L. (1988). SERVQUAL: a multiple scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. Journal of Retailing 64: 12–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Parasuraman, A., Zeithamal, V.A. Berry, L. (1990). An empirical test of the extended gaps model of service quality. Marketing Science Institute Working paper, pp. 90–122.

  • Parikh D. (2005). Measuring retail service quality: an empirical study in a developing country. South Asian Journal of Management 12(2): 43–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Saaty T.L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process, 9th edn. New York, McGraw Hill

    Google Scholar 

  • Shee D.Y., Tzeng G.-H., Tang T.-I. (2003). AHP, fuzzy measure and fuzzy approaches for the appraisal of information service providers in Taiwan. Journal of Global Information Technology Management 6(1): 8–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsaura S.-H., Changb T.-Y., Yena C.-H. (2002). The evaluation of airline service quality by fuzzy MCDM. Tourism Management 23: 107–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ufek C., Ahmet B. (2002). An approach to the evaluation of quality performance of the companies in Turkey. Managerial Auditing Journal 17(1/2): 92–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y., Lo H.-P., Hui Y.V. (2003). The antecedents of service quality and product quality and their influences on bank reputation: evidence from the banking industry in China. Managing Service Quality 13(1): 72–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu W.-Y., Hsiao S.-W., Kuo H.-P. (2004). Fuzzy set theory based decision model for determining market position and developing strategy for hospital service quality. Total Quality Management and Business Excellence 15(4): 439–456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh L.A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information and Control 8: 338–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh L.A. (1975). The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to reasoning. Information Sciences 8: 199–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeithaml V.A. (1996). The behavioral consequences of service quality. Journal of Marketing 60(2): 31–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou D., Ma J., Efraim T. (2001). Journal quality assessment: an integrated subjective and objective approach. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 48(4): 479–490

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wen-Ko Liang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tsai, MT., Wu, HL. & Liang, WK. Fuzzy Decision Making for Market Positioning and Developing Strategy for Improving Service Quality in Department Stores. Qual Quant 42, 303–319 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-006-9047-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-006-9047-1

Keywords

Navigation