Skip to main content
Log in

Measuring Interviewer Performance in Telephone Surveys

  • Published:
Quality and Quantity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this research paper, the definition of interviewer performance is restricted to mean the capacity of an interviewer to convince a respondent to cooperate. Furthermore, it is restricted to performance in telephone surveys. To measure this aspect of performance, researchers have until now used the cooperation rate, calculated as the number of completed interviews divided by the sum of completes plus refusals, generally retaining only the first contacts made to a given phone number in order to avoid contaminating the measure with the performance of a previous interviewer. In this paper, we argue that this measure is biased because it does not allow for the measurement of performance when interviewers, usually the best ones, work on refusal conversion or on appointments. We propose a new measure of the net contribution of interviewers to the overall cooperation rate – the Net Contribution to Performance Index (NCPI) – that measures interviewer performance irrespective of the task they perform. The properties of the index are compared with the cooperation rate at first contact using a number of criteria: reliability, variability and relationship with the overall response rate, and internal and external validity. Appendix A explains how to calculate the new index.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • P. Campanelli C. O’Muircheartaigh (1999) ArticleTitleInterviewers, interviewer continuity, and panel survey nonresponse Quality & Quantity 33 59–76

    Google Scholar 

  • H. Houtkoop-Steenstra H. Vanden Bergh (2000) ArticleTitleEffects of introductions in large-scale telephone survey interviews Sociological Methods & Research 28 IssueID3 281–300

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Hox. E. Leeuw Particlede H. Vorst (1995) ArticleTitleSurvey participation as reasoned action; a behavioral paradigm for survey nonresponse Bulletin de Méthodologie 48 52–67

    Google Scholar 

  • D. R. Ilgen J. Schneider (1991) ArticleTitlePerformance measurement: a multi-discipline view International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology 6 71–108

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Pickery G. Loosveldt (2002) ArticleTitleA multilevel multinomial analysis of interviewer effects on various components of unit nonresponse Quality & Quantity 36 427–437

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Presser S. Zhao (1992) ArticleTitleAttributes of questions and interviewers as correlates of interviewing performance Pblic Opinion Quarterly 56 IssueID2 236–40 Occurrence Handle10.1086/269314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • N. M. Thurkow S. Bailey M. R. Stamper (2000) ArticleTitleThe effects of group and individual monetary incentives on productivity of telephone interviewers Journal of Organizational Behavior Management 20 IssueID2 3–25 Occurrence Handle10.1300/J075v20n02_02

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Claire Durand.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Durand, C. Measuring Interviewer Performance in Telephone Surveys. Qual Quant 39, 763–778 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-004-6781-0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-004-6781-0

Keywords

Navigation