Skip to main content
Log in

Proof of Monotone Loss Rate of Fluid Priority-Queue with Finite Buffer

  • Published:
Queueing Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper studies a fluid queueing system that has a single server, a single finite buffer, and which applies a strict priority discipline to multiple arriving streams of different classes. The arriving streams are modeled by statistically independent, identically distributed random processes. A proof is presented for the highly intuitive result that, in such a queueing system, a higher priority class stream has a lower average fluid loss rate than a lower priority class stream. The proof exploits the fact that for a work-conserving queue, the fluid loss rate for a given class is invariant of what queueing discipline is applied to all arriving fluid of this particular class.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. E. Altman, T. Jimenez and G. Koole, On optimal call admission control in resource-sharing system, IEEE Trans. Commun. 49(9) (2001) 1659–1668.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. D. Bertsimas, D. Gamarnik and J. Tsitsiklis, Stability conditions for multiclass fluid queueing networks, IEEE Trans. Automat. Control 41(11) (1996) 1618–1631.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. D. Bertsekas and R. Gallager, Data Networks, 2nd Ed. (Prentice Hall, 1992).

  4. N. Christin, J. Liebeherr and T.F. Abdelzaher, A quantitative assured forwarding service, in: Proc. IEEE INFOCOM 2002, Vol. 2 (2002) pp. 864–873.

    Google Scholar 

  5. B.D. Choi, B.C. Shin, K.B. Choi, D.H. Han and J.S. Jang, Priority queue with two state Markov modulated arrivals, in: Proc. IEEE ICC '96, Vol. 2 (1996) pp. 1055–1059.

    Google Scholar 

  6. J. Choe and N.B. Shroff, A central-limit-theorem-based approach for analyzing queue behavior in high-speed networks, IEEE/ACM Trans. Networking 6(5) (1998) 659–671.

    Google Scholar 

  7. J. Choe and N.B. Shroff, On the supremum distribution of integrated stationary Gaussian processes with negative linear drift, Adv. in Appl. Probab. 31(1) (1999) 135–157.

    Google Scholar 

  8. A. Elwalid and D. Mitra, Analysis, approximations and admission control of a multi-service multiplexing system with priorities, in: Proc. IEEE INFOCOM '95, Vol. 2 (1995) pp. 463–472.

    Google Scholar 

  9. A.I. Elwalid and D. Mitra, Fluid models for the analysis and design of statistical multiplexing with loss priorities on multiple classes of bursty traffic, in: Proc. IEEE INFOCOM '92, Vol. 1 (1992) pp. 415–425.

    Google Scholar 

  10. P. Fonseca, J.M. Pitts and L.G. Cuthbert, Exact fluid-flow analysis of single ON/OFF source feeding an ATM buffer with space priority, Electronics Letters 31(13) (1995) 1028–1029.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. B. Hajek, Large bursts do not cause instability, IEEE Trans. Automat. Control 45(1) (2000) 116–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. F.P. Kelly, Models for a self-managed Internet, Philosoph. Trans. Royal Soc. London A358 (2000) 2335–2348.

    Google Scholar 

  13. C. Knessl and C. Tier, A simple fluid model for servicing priority traffic, IEEE Trans. Automat. Control 45(6) (2001) 909–914.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. L. Kleinrock, Queueing Systems Volume II: Computer Applications (Wiley Interscience, 1975).

  15. J. Liebeherr, S.D. Patek and A. Burchard, Statistical per-flow service bounds in a network with aggregate provisioning, in: Proc. IEEE INFOCOM 2003, Vol. 3 (2003) pp. 1680–1690.

    Google Scholar 

  16. S.H. Low and P.P. Varaiya, Burst reducing servers in ATM networks, Queueing Systems 20 (1995) 61–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. S.H. Low and P.P. Varaiya, A new approach to service provisioning in ATM networks, IEEE/ACM Trans. Networking 1(5) (1993) 547–553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Y. Liu and W. Gong, On fluid queueing system with strict priority, in: Proc. IEEE Conf. on Decision and Control, Vol. 2 (2001) pp. 1923–1928.

  19. D.C. Lee, Worst-case fraction of CBR teletraffic unpunctual due to statistical multiplexing, IEEE/ACM Trans. Networking 4(1) (1996) 98–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. A. Narayanan and V.G. Kulkarni, First passage times in fluid models with an application to two priority fluid systems, in: Proc. IEEE IPDS '96 (1996) pp. 166–175.

  21. H.L. Royden, Real Analysis, 3rd Ed. (Prentice-Hall, 1988).

  22. S. Shakkottai and R. Srikant, Deterministic fluid models of congestion control in high-speed networks, in: Proc. Winter Simulations Conf., Arlington, VA (December, 2001).

  23. B. Sericola and B. Tuffin, A fluid queue driven by a Markovian queue, Queueing Systems 31(3/4) (1999) 253–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. L. Tassiulas and A. Ephremides, Jointly optimal routing and scheduling in packet radio networks, IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory 38(1) (1992) 165–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. D.N.C. Tse, R.G. Gallager and J.N. Tsitsiklis, Statistical multiplexing of multiple time-scale Markov streams, IEEE J. Selected Areas in Commun. 13(6) (1995) 1028–1038.

    Google Scholar 

  26. J. Zhang, Performance study of Markov modulated fluid flow models with priority traffic, in: Proc. IEEE INFOCOM '93, Vol. 1 (1993) pp. 10–17.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephen L. Spitler.

Additional information

AMS subject classification: 60K25, 68M20

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Spitler, S.L., Lee, D.C. Proof of Monotone Loss Rate of Fluid Priority-Queue with Finite Buffer. Queueing Syst 51, 77–87 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11134-005-3749-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11134-005-3749-2

Keywords

Navigation