Qualitative Sociology

, Volume 40, Issue 2, pp 191–214 | Cite as

A Proposal for Public Sociology as Localized Intervention and Collective Enterprise: The Makings and Impact of Invisible in Austin

  • Caitlyn Collins
  • Katherine Jensen
  • Javier AuyeroEmail author


What can local public sociology look like, and what does it accomplish? This essay tracks the origins, makings and impacts of the book Invisible in Austin to evaluate its model of public sociology: as a collective enterprise with a local aim. Invisible in Austin: Life and Labor in an American City, the culmination of a three-year collaborative qualitative research project between a professor and twelve graduate students, depicts social suffering as lived for 11 individuals in Austin, Texas—a booming, highly segregated city with one of the country’s highest levels of income inequality. In its design, production, and effects, it envisions public sociology in a two-fold sense—in its joint, horizontal making, and in its intent to intervene in the local public sphere to make visible the daily lived experience of social marginality for those whose labor allows Austin to survive and thrive as a hip, creative technopolis—house cleaners, office machine repairers, cab drivers, restaurant cooks and dish washers, exotic dancers, musicians, and roofers, among them. Reflecting on the origins of the book, its joint assembling, and its outcomes thus far, we take stock of the lessons learned. In so doing, we provide a rubric for evaluating the wide spectrum of possible impacts of a public sociological intervention: through direct and indirect audience engagements, on the project’s subjects, and on local public policy. This reflection concludes with three suggestions: to approach public sociology as collective enterprise, to take narrative seriously, and to seek wide exposure.


Public sociology Social suffering Collective qualitative research Bourdieu 



We thank our co-authors Eric Borja, Jacinto Cuvi, Jessica Dunning-Lozano, Kristine Kilanski, Amias Maldonado, Pamela Neumann, Marcos Pérez, Jennifer Scott, Katherine Sobering, and Maggie Tate (fellow founding members of the Urban Ethnography Lab at the University of Texas at Austin), as well as our photographers Eva Hershaw and Julia Robinson, and the subjects of our book (whom we call Chip, Clarissa, Ella, Ethan, Inés, Keith, Kumar, Manuel, Raven, Santos, and Xiomara)—without whom the book (and this article) wouldn’t be possible. We are grateful to David Smilde and three anonymous reviewers for their helpful suggestions.


  1. Abbott, Andrew. 1997. Of time and space: The contemporary relevance of the Chicago School. Social Forces 75 (4): 1149–1182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abbott, Andrew. 1999. Department and discipline: Chicago school at one hundred. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  3. Adichie, Chimamanda Ngozi. 2009. The danger of a single story. Ted Talk. July. <>.
  4. Agger, Ben. 2000. Public sociology: From social facts to literary acts. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  5. Alarcón, Cristian. 2010. Si me querés, quereme transa. Buenos Aires: Grupo Editorial Norma.Google Scholar
  6. Auyero, Javier, ed. 2015. Invisible in Austin: Life and labor in an American city. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
  7. Beck, Ulrich. 2005. How not to become a museum piece. The British Journal of Sociology 56 (3): 335–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Becker, Howard. 1999. The Chicago School, so-called. Qualitative Sociology 22 (1): 3–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Boo, Katherine. 2012. Behind the beautiful forevers: Life, death, and hope in a Mumbai undercity. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  10. Bourdieu, Pierre. 2000a. For a scholarship with commitment. Profession: 40–45.Google Scholar
  11. Bourdieu, Pierre. 2000b. Pascalian meditations. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Bourdieu, Pierre. 2003. Participant objectivation. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 9 (2): 281–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bourdieu, Pierre, Accardo Alain, and Balazs Gabrielle. 2000. The weight of the world. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Braude, Lee. 1970. “Park and Burgess”: An appreciation. American Journal of Sociology 76 (1): 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Burawoy, Michael. 2004a. “Introduction” to public sociologies: A symposium from Boston college. Social Problems 51 (1): 103–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Burawoy, Michael. 2004b. Public sociologies: Contradictions, dilemmas, and possibilities. Social Forces 82 (4): 1603–1618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Burawoy, Michael. 2005. 2004 ASA presidential address: For public sociology. American Sociological Review 70 (1): 4–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Burawoy, Michael. 2014. Introduction: Sociology as a combat sport. Current Sociology 62 (2): 140–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Burawoy, Michael. 2016. Sociology as a vocation. Contemporary Sociology 45 (4): 379–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Burawoy, Michael, Alice Burton, Ann Arnett Ferguson, and Kathryn J. Fox. 1991. Ethnography unbound: Power and resistance in the modern metropolis. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  21. Calhoun, Craig. 2005. The promise of public sociology. The British Journal of Sociology 56 (3): 355–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Champagne, Patrick. 2005. “Making the people speak”: On the social uses of and reactions to public opinion polls. In Pierre Bourdieu and democratic politics: The mystery of ministry, ed. Malden Loïc Wacquant, 111–132. MA: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  23. Clawson, Dan, and Robert Zussman, eds. 2007. Public sociology: Fifteen eminent sociologists debate politics and the profession in the twenty-first century. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  24. Cooper, Marianne. 2014. Cut adrift: Families in insecure times. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  25. Derber, Charles. 2004. Public sociology as a vocation. Social Problems 51 (1): 119–121.Google Scholar
  26. Desmond, Matthew. 2016. Evicted: Poverty and profit in the American city. New York: Crown.Google Scholar
  27. Emerson, Robert. 1983. Contemporary field research. A collection of readings. Boston, Little Brown and Company.Google Scholar
  28. Fernandez-Kelly, Patricia. 2015. The hero’s fight. In African Americans in West Baltimore and the shadow of the state. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Florida, Richard. 2002. The rise of the creative class: And how it’s transforming work, leisure, community and everyday life. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  30. Gamson, William. 2004. Life on the interface. Social Problems 51 (1): 106–110.Google Scholar
  31. Geertz, Clifford. 1973. The interpretation of cultures. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  32. Hacher, Sebastián. 2011. Sangre salada: Una feria en los márgenes. Buenos Aires: Marea Editorial.Google Scholar
  33. Holmwood, John. 2007. Sociology as public discourse and professional practice: A critique of Michael Burawoy. Sociological Theory 25 (1): 46–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lamont, Michelle. 2002. The dignity of working men: Morality and the boundaries of race, class, and immigration. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Lareau, Annette. 2003. Unequal childhoods: Class, race, and family life. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  36. Licitra, Josefina. 2011. Los otros. Buenos Aires: Debate.Google Scholar
  37. Massey, Douglas S., and Nancy A. Denton. 1998. American apartheid: Segregation and the making of the underclass. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Mills, C. Wright. 1959. The sociological imagination. Oxford: London.Google Scholar
  39. Morris, Aldon. 2015. The scholar denied: W.E.B. Du Bois and the birth of modern sociology. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  40. Pager, Devah. 2003. The mark of a criminal record. American Journal of Sociology 108 (5): 937–975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Park, Robert E., and Ernest W. Burgess. 1921. Introduction to the science of sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  42. Pfohl, Stephen. 2004. Blessings and curses in the sociology classroom. Social Problems 51 (1): 113–115.Google Scholar
  43. Prus, Robert. 1996. Symbolic interaction and ethnographic research: Intersubjectivity and the study of human lived experience. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  44. Royce, Edward. 1996. The public intellectual reconsidered. Humanity and Society 20 (1): 3017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Scheper-Hughes, Nancy. 1992. Death without weeping: The violence of everyday life in Brazil. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  46. Schor, Juliet. 2004. From obscurity to People Magazine. Social Problems 51 (1): 121–124.Google Scholar
  47. Shaw, Clifford. 1930. The jack-roller. A delinquent boy’s own story. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  48. Short, James F., ed. 1971. The social fabric of the metropolis: Contributions of the Chicago School of Urban Sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  49. Stacey, Judith. 2004. Marital suitors court social science spin-sters: The unwittingly conservative effects of public sociology. Social Problems 51 (1): 131–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Steinberg, Stephen. 2007. Race relations: A critique. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Straubhaar, Joseph. 2013. Inequity in the technopolis: Race, class, gender, and the digital divide in Austin. Austin: The University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
  52. Tang, Eric and Chunhui Ren. 2014. Outlier: The case of Austin’s declining African-American population. Issue Brief. The Institute for Urban Policy Research and Analysis. The University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar
  53. Terkel, Studs. 1974. Working: People talk about what they do all day and how they feel about what they do. New York: Ballantine Books.Google Scholar
  54. Tilly, Charles. 1999. Durable inequality. Berkeley: The University of California Press.Google Scholar
  55. Tretter, Eliot. 2016. Shadows of a sunbelt city: The environment, racism, and the knowledge economy in Austin. Athens: The University of Georgia Press.Google Scholar
  56. Vaughan, Diane. 2004. Public sociologist by accident. Social Problems 51 (1): 115–119.Google Scholar
  57. Wacquant, Loïc. 2009. Punishing the poor: The neoliberal government of social insecurity. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Weiss, Robert S. 1994. Learning from strangers: The art and method of qualitative interview studies. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  59. Wilkinson, Iain. 2005. Suffering: A sociological introduction. New York: Polity.Google Scholar
  60. Zorbaugh, Harvey. 1929. The gold coast and the slum. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Caitlyn Collins
    • 1
  • Katherine Jensen
    • 2
  • Javier Auyero
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.Washington University in St. LouisSt. LouisUSA
  2. 2.The University of Texas at AustinAustinUSA

Personalised recommendations