Qualitative Sociology

, Volume 39, Issue 1, pp 1–26 | Cite as

Reasoning Together Through Telling Stories: How People Talk about Social Controversies

  • Penny Edgell
  • Kathleen E. Hull
  • Kyle Green
  • Daniel Winchester
Article

Abstract

We use focus groups of ordinary citizens talking about social controversies to analyze the role of storytelling in collective reasoning. Prior research has emphasized storytelling and abstract reasoning as distinct rhetorical forms, and elaborated on how they function differently in group deliberation. But we find that people often combine the telling of stories and the articulation of abstract principles as they reason together about controversial issues. We extend prior research by showing how storytelling can foster collective reasoning and how people combine telling stories and stating abstract principles to create morally complex understandings of concrete courses of action. We complicate earlier research by showing that, in some group settings, stories are treated as legitimate justifications for the speaker’s preferences and are not used disproportionately by more marginal group members. Our research emphasizes the constitutive role that storytelling can play in collective reasoning by highlighting the interplay of stories and abstract principles and the way that stories themselves can function as a form of reason-giving.

Keywords

Storytelling Collective reasoning Social controversies Focus groups Vignettes 

References

  1. Abell, Peter. 2004. Narrative explanation: An alternative to variable-centered explanation? Annual Review of Sociology 30: 287–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ainsworth, Susan, and Cynthia Hardy. 2012. Subjects of inquiry: Statistics, stories, and the production of knowledge. Organization Studies 33: 1693–1714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alexander, Jeffrey C. 1993. The discourse of American civil society. Theory and Society 22: 151–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Alexander, Jeffrey C. 2003. The meanings of social life: a cultural sociology. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ammerman, Nancy T. 2003. Religious identities and religious institutions. In Handbook of the sociology of religion, ed. Michelle Dillon, 207–224. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bickford, Susan. 1996. The dissonance of democracy: listening, conflict, and citizenship. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Binder, Amy J. 2004. Contentious Curricula: afrocentrism and creationism in American public schools. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Black, Laura W. 2009. Listening to the city: Difference, identity, and storytelling in deliberative groups. Journal of Public Deliberation 5(1): Article 4. Available at: http://www.publicdeliberation.net/jpd/vol5/iss1/art4.
  9. Bloor, Michael, Jane Frankland, Michelle Thomas, and Kate Robson. 2001. Focus groups in social research. London: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
  10. Bohman, James. 1996. Public deliberation: plurality, complexity, and democracy. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  11. Braunstein, Ruth. 2012. Storytelling in liberal religious advocacy. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 51: 110–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Calhoun, Craig. 1993. Nationalism and ethnicity. Annual Review of Sociology 19: 211–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cerulo, Karen A. 1998. Deciphering violence: the cognitive structure of right and wrong. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Cohen, Joshua. 1989. Deliberation and democratic legitimacy. In The good polity: normative analysis of the state, ed. Alan Hamlin and Philip Pettit, 17–34. London: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  15. Czarniawska, Barbara. 1998. A narrative approach to organization studies. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage.Google Scholar
  16. Damasio, Antonio. 1994. Descartes’ error: emotion, reason, and the human brain. New York: Picador.Google Scholar
  17. DeGloma, Thomas. 2010. Awakenings: Autobiography, memory, and the social logic of personal discovery. Sociological Forum 25: 519–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Delgado, Richard. 1989. Storytelling for oppositionists and others: A plea for narrative. Michigan Law Review 87: 2411–2441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dryzek, John S. 2000. Deliberative democracy and beyond: liberals, critics, contestations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Elliott, Jane. 2005. Using narrative in social research: qualitative and quantitative approaches. London: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
  21. Evans, John H. 2002. Playing God? Human genetic engineering and the rationalization of public bioethical debate. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  22. Evans, John H. 2010. Contested reproduction: genetic technologies, religion and public debate. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ewick, Patricia, and Susan Silbey. 2003. Narrating social structure: Stories of resistance to legal authority. American Journal of Sociology 108: 1328–1372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ezzy, Douglas. 1998. Theorizing Narrative identity: Symbolic interactionism and hermeneutics. The Sociological Quarterly 39: 239–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Fraser, Nancy. 1991. Rethinking the public sphere: A contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy. In Habermas and the public sphere, ed. Craig Calhoun, 109–142. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  26. Gamson, William A. 1992. Talking politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Gamson, William A. 2001. How storytelling can be empowering. In Culture in mind: toward a sociology of culture and cognition, ed. Karen Cerulo, 187–200. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  28. Gingberg, Faye D. 1998. Contested lives: the abortion debate in an American community. Updated edition. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  29. Guttman, Amy, and Dennis F. Thompson. 1996. Democracy and disagreement. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Habermas, Jürgen. 1984. The theory of communicative action. Translated by T. McCarthy. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  31. Hinchman, Lewis P., and Sandra K. Hinchman. 1997. Introduction. In Memory, identity, community: the idea of narrative in the human sciences, ed. Lewis P. Hinchman and Sandra K. Hinchman, xiii–xxxii. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  32. Hunter, James. 1991. Culture wars: the struggle to define America. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  33. Jacobs, Ronald N., and Sarah Sobieraj. 2007. Narrative and legitimacy: US congressional debates about the nonprofit sector. Sociological Theory 25: 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kidd, Justin. 2012. Legislating creativity: the intersections of Art and politics. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  35. Labov, William, and Joshua Waletsky. 1967. Narrative analysis: Oral versions of personal experience. In Essays on the verbal and visual arts, ed. June Helm, 12–44. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
  36. Loeske, Donileen R. 2007. The study of identity as cultural, institutional, organizational, and personal narratives: Theoretical and empirical integrations. The Sociological Quarterly 48: 661–668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lynch, Michael P. 2012. In praise of reason: why rationality matters for democracy. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  38. Mansbridge, Jane. 1999. Everyday talk in the deliberative system. In Deliberative politics: essays on democracy and disagreement, ed. Stephen Macedo, 211–240. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Massengill, Rebekah Peeples. 2008. Prayers of the people: Moral metaphors in the right-to-life and faith-based labor movements. Poetics 36: 338–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Miller, David. 2002. Is deliberative democracy unfair to disadvantaged groups? In Democracy as public deliberation: new perspectives, ed. Maurizio Passerin D’Entreves, 201–225. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Moshman, David, and Molly Greil. 1998. Collaborative reasoning: Evidence for collective rationality. Thinking and Reasoning 4: 231–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Murphy, Jane C. 1993. Lawyering for social change: The power of the narrative in domestic violence law reform. Hofstra Law Review 21: 1243–1294.Google Scholar
  43. Perrin, Andrew J. 2006. Citizen speak: the democratic imagination in American life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Polkinghorne, Donald. 1988. Narrative knowing and the human sciences. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  45. Polletta, Francesca. 1998. “It was like a fever…”: Narrative and identity in social protest. Social Problems 45: 137–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Polletta, Francesca, and John Lee. 2006. Is telling stories good for democracy? Rhetoric in public deliberation after 9/11. American Sociological Review 71: 699–721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Polletta, Francesca, Pang Ching, Bobby Chen, Beth Gharrity Gardner, and Alice Motes. 2011. The sociology of storytelling. Annual Review of Sociology 37: 109–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Quinn, Naomi. 2005. How to reconstruct schemas people share, from what they say. In Finding culture in talk: a collection of methods, ed. Naomi Quinn, 35–81. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  49. Ragin, Charles C., and Howard S. Becker. 1992. What is a case? Exploring the foundations of social inquiry. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Rawls, John. 1971. A theory of justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Ryfe, David M. 2006. Narrative and deliberation in small group forums. Journal of Applied Communication Research 34: 72–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Sanders, Lynn M. 1997. Against deliberation. Political Theory 25: 347–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Schneiderhan, Erik, and Shamus Khan. 2008. Reasons and inclusion: The foundation of deliberation. Sociological Theory 26: 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Smith, Philip. 2005. Why war? The cultural logic of Iraq, the gulf war, and suez. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Smith, Brett, and Andrew C. Sparkes. 2008. Contrasting perspectives on narrating selves and identities: An invitation to dialogue. Qualitative Research 8: 5–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Somers, Margaret R. 1994. The narrative constitution of identity: A relational and network approach. Theory and Society 23: 605–649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Somers, Margaret R., and Gloria D. Gibson. 1994. Reclaiming the epistemological ‘Other’: Narrative and the social constitution of identity. In Social theory and the politics of identity, ed. Craig Calhoun, 37–99. Oxford UK & Cambridge USA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  58. Tavory, Iddo, and Stefan Timmermans. 2009. Two cases of ethnography: Grounded theory and the extended case method. Ethnography 10: 243–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Tilly, Charles. 2002. Stories, identities, and political change. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  60. Wilkinson, Sue. 1998. Focus groups in feminist research: Power, interaction, and the co-construction of meaning. Women’s Studies International Forum 21: 111–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Williams, Gareth H. 2000. Knowledgeable narratives. Anthropology & Medicine 7: 35–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Wilson, John, and Karyn Stapleton. 2010. The big story about small stories: Narratives of crime and terrorism. Journal of Sociolinguistics 14: 287–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Wuthnow, Robert. 2007. Cognition and religion. Sociology of Religion 68: 341–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Yamane, David. 2000. Narrative and religious experience. Sociology of Religion 61: 171–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Young, Iris Marion. 1996. Communication and the other: Beyond deliberative democracy. In Democracy and difference: contesting the boundaries of the political, ed. Seyla Benhabib, 12–136. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  66. Young, Iris Marion. 2000. Inclusion and democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Penny Edgell
    • 1
  • Kathleen E. Hull
    • 1
  • Kyle Green
    • 2
  • Daniel Winchester
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of SociologyUniversity of MinnesotaMinneapolisUSA
  2. 2.Department of Sociology/AnthropologyUtica CollegeUticaUSA
  3. 3.Department of SociologyPurdue UniversityWest LafayetteUSA

Personalised recommendations