Advertisement

Qualitative Sociology

, Volume 38, Issue 3, pp 235–259 | Cite as

Winding Down the Workday: Zoning the Evening Hours in Paris, Oslo, and San Francisco

  • Jeremy Markham Schulz
Article
  • 347 Downloads

Abstract

This article explores the subtle yet far-reaching ways that cultural environments shape the uses of the evening hours among business professionals in three countries. Drawing on interviews with professional men and women living and working in Paris, Oslo, and San Francisco from a spectrum of professional fields and employers, the article explores their evening routines. Three contrasting patterns are identified. Where the early evening hours between 17:00 and 21:00 are concerned, French, Norwegian, and American professionals traverse different cultural terrains. The French professionals and their employers treat this temporal zone as a status-conferring period. Adhering to a transorganizational cultural convention defining the early evening as work time, they use these hours to distinguish themselves as committed practioners of their métier equipped with status and authority. In Norway, comparable professionals approach this period as nonwork time off limits to their employer. Early departures from the office are encouraged and facilitated in the Norwegian workplace. Among the American professionals far less uniformity prevails among the evening routines of respondents working in different organizations and occupations. This variability is explained by the absence of the higher-level temporal conventions present in the two European contexts. In the American setting two deciding factors come into play: the temporal expectations of the professional’s employer and the bargaining power wielded by the individual professional vis-à-vis this employer. These differences between the evening routines of the three groups reflect important cultural differences across countries with broadly similar postindustrial landscapes.

Keywords

Work Professionals Cross-national sociology Culture Work-life nexus Temporality 

Notes

Acknowledgments

I wish to acknowledge the financial and logistical support of a number of institutions and programs, including the National Science Foundation, the University of California’s LERF, the FLAS program, the American-Scandinavian Foundation, the UC Berkeley Departments of Sociology and Scandinavian Studies, the Cornell Department of Sociology, the Department of Sociology and Human Geography at the University of Oslo, and the Center for the Sociology of Organizations. The paper has benefited from the feedback, comments, and insights provided by many scholars, including Neil Fligstein, Arlie Hochschild, Mary Blair-Loy, Marion Fourcade, Victor Nee, Trond Petersen, Neil Smelser, Richard Swedberg, Michèle Lamont, Laura Robinson, Jean-Pascal Daloz, Stanley Brandes, Brian Lande, Benjamin Moodie, Jennifer Silva, Sigtona Halrynjo, Karin Widerberg, Odd Frank Vaage, Øyvind Wiborg, Gabe Ignatow, Ofer Sharone, Helene Aarseth, Jen Hook, Victor Chen, Erling R. Larsen, Selma Lyng, Ingjerd Skafle, Heidi Nicolaisen, Abby Larson, Erin York Cornwell, and Benjamin Cornwell. David Smilde is also due thanks for providing valuable advice on the manuscript. Finally, I would like to express my deep appreciation to the interviewees who graciously and generously spent several hours of their precious time sharing details of their busy lives.

References

  1. Aarseth, Helene. 2007. Optimalisering på alle livsområder?: Likestilt familieliv in ny økonomi. In Arbeidslivets Klemmer: Paradokser i det nye arbeidslivet, ed. Elin Kvande and Bente Rasmussen, 59–80. Bergen: Fagbokforlaget.Google Scholar
  2. Adam, Barbara. 1995. Timewatch: The social analysis of time. Oxford: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  3. Alesina, Alberto, Edward Glaeser, and Bruce Sacerdote. 2005. Work and leisure in the US and the EU: Why so different? NBER working paper #11278. Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Alford, Robert. 1998. The craft of inquiry: Theories, methods, evidence. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bailyn, Lotte. 1993. Breaking the mold: Women, men, and time in the new corporate world. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  6. Bartolomé, Fernando, and Paul Lee Evans. 1979. Professional lives versus private lives: Shifting patterns of managerial commitment. Organizational Dynamics 7: 3–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blair-Loy, Mary. 2003. Competing devotions: Career and family among women executives. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Blair-Loy, Mary, and Jerry Jacobs. 2003. Globalization, work hours, and the care deficit among stockbrokers. Gender and Society 17(2): 230–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bloom, Nick, Tobias Kretschmer, and John Van Reenen. 2009. Work-Life balance, management practices and productivity. In International differences in the business practices and productivity of firms, ed. Robert B. Freeman and Kathryn L. Shaw, 15–54. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  10. Boltanski, Luc. 1982. Les Cadres: La formation d’un groupe social. Paris: Les editions de minuit.Google Scholar
  11. Burda, Michael. 2008. Time use and work timing. In Working hours and job sharing in the UE and the USA: Are Europeans lazy? Are Americans crazy? ed. Tito Boeri et al., 15–45. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Clawson, Dan, and Naomi Gerstel. 2014. Unequal time: Gender, class, and family in employment schedules. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
  13. Cooper, Marianne. 2000. Being the ‘Go-to-Guy’: Fatherhood, masculinity, and the organization of work in Silicon Valley. Qualitative Sociology 20: 465–480.Google Scholar
  14. Cousin, Olivier. 2004. Les Cadres: Grandeur et incertitude. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
  15. D’Iribarne, Philippe. 1989. La logique de l’honneur – Gestion des enterprises et traditions nationales. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
  16. D’Iribarne, Philippe. 2006. L’étrangete Française. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
  17. D’Iribarne, Philippe. 2009. National cultures and organisations in search of a theory: An interpretative approach. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management 9(3): 309–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. DeVault, Marjorie. 1991. Feeding the family. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  19. Dupré, Michel, and Michel Lallement. 2007. Regulation of working time in SMEs of the information and communication technology sector in France. New Technology, Work and Employment 22: 66–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dupuy, François. 2005. La fatigue des élites: Le capitalisme et ses cadres. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
  21. Ellingsæter, Anne Lise. 2009. Vår Tidens Moderne Tider. Oslo: Universitetsforlag.Google Scholar
  22. Ellingsæter, Annelise, and Lars Gulbrandsen. 2007. Closing the childcare gap: The interaction of childcare provision and mothers’ agency in Norway. Journal of Social Policy 36: 649–669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Epstein, Cynthia Fuchs. 1999. The part-time paradox: Time norms, professional life, family and gender. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  24. Fischer, Claude. 2008. Paradoxes of American individualism. Sociological Forum 23(2): 362–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Flaherty, Michael G. 2011. The textures of time: Agency and temporal experience. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Gadea, Charles. 2003. Les cadres en France: Une énigme sociologique. Paris: Éditions Belin.Google Scholar
  27. Gershuny, Jonathan. 2000. Changing times. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Gershuny, J., and O. Sullivan. 2003. Time use, gender, and public policy regimes. Social Politics. 10(2): 205–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Glorieux, Ignace, Inge Mestdag, and Joeri Minnen. 2008. The coming of the 24-hour economy? Time & Society 17(1): 63–83.Google Scholar
  30. Gregg, Melissa. 2011. Work’s intimacy. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  31. Gullestad, Marianne. 1992. The art of social relations: Essays on culture, social action, and everyday life in modern Norway. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar
  32. Halrynjo, Sigtona. 2007. Alltid beredt? Arbeids og familiedilemmær i møte med arbeidslivets formelle og uformelle spilleregler i et sort konsern. In Arbeidlivets klemmer: Paradokser i det nye arbeidslivet, ed. Elin Kvande and Bente Rasmussen, 81–106. Bergen: Fagbokforlaget.Google Scholar
  33. Halrynjo, Sigtona, and Selma Lyng. 2009. Preferences, constraints, or schemas of devotion? Exploring Norwegian mothers’ withdrawals from high-commitment careers. The British Journal of Sociology 60: 321–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Halrynjo, Sigtona, and Selma Lyng. 2010. Fars forkjørett - mors vikeplikt? Kjønn, karriere, or omsorgansvar i eliteprofesjoner. Tidsskrift for samfunnsforskning 51: 249–280.Google Scholar
  35. Hamermesh, Daniel, and Elena Stancanelli. 2014. Long workweeks and strange hours. Working Paper 20449. Cambridge: NBER.Google Scholar
  36. Heinz, J., Robert Nelson, Rebecca Sandefur, and Edward Laumann. 2005. Urban lawyers: The new social structure of the bar. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  37. Henni, Azdine, and Françoise Piotet. 2004. Vous avez dit 35 heures? In Les cadres au travail: Les nouvelles règles du jeu, ed. Anousheh Karvar and Luc Rouban, 57–72. Paris: La Découverte.Google Scholar
  38. Hewlett, Sylvia, and Carolyn Buck Luce. 2007. Seduction and risk: The emergence of extreme jobs. New York: Center for Work-Life Policy.Google Scholar
  39. Hochschild, Arlie Russell. 1997. The Time bind: When work becomes home and home becomes work. New York: Metropolitan Books.Google Scholar
  40. Jacobs, Jerry, and Kathleen Gerson. 2004. The time divide: Work, family, and gender inequality in the 20st century. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Lallement, Michel. 2003. Temps, travail et modes de vie. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
  42. Lee, Sangheon, Deirdre McCann, and Jon Messenger. 2007. Working time around the world. London: Routledge and ILO.Google Scholar
  43. Lewis, David J., and Andrew J. Weigert. 1981. The structures and meanings of social time. Social Forces 60: 432–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Luker, Kristin. 2009. Salsa-dancing into the social sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Maxwell, Joseph. 1996. Qualitative research design: An interactive approach. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  46. Medalia, Carla, and Jerry Jacobs. 2008. Working time for married couples in 28 countries. In The long work hours culture: Causes and consequences, ed. Ronald Burke and Gary Cooper, 137–158. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.Google Scholar
  47. Melbin, Murray. 1987. Night as frontier: Colonizing the world after dark. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  48. Merton, Robert. 1984. Socially expected durations: A case study of concept formation in sociology. In Conflict and consensus: Essays in honor of Lewis A. Coser, ed. Walter Powell and Robert Robbins, 262–283. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  49. Moen, Phyllis, Kathleen Christensen, and Ralph Gomory. 2013. Time work by overworked professionals: Strategies in response to the stress of higher status. Work and Occupations 40(2): 79–114.Google Scholar
  50. Nippert-Eng, Christena. 1995. Home and work: Negotiating boundaries through everyday life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  51. Perlow, Leslie. 2001. Time to coordinate: Toward an understanding of work-time standards and norms in a multicountry Studysof software engineers. Work and Occupations 28: 91–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Perlow, Leslie. & Jessica Porter. 2009. Making time off predictable and required. Harvard Business Review 87(10): 102–109, 142.Google Scholar
  53. Piotet, Françoise. 2007. Emploi et travail: Le grande écart. Paris: Armand Colin.Google Scholar
  54. Poster, Winifred, and Srirupa Prasad. 2005. Work-family relations in transnational perspective: A view from high-tech firms in India and the United States. Social Problems 52: 122–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Reid, Erin. 2015. Embracing, passing, revealing, and the ideal worker image: How people navigate expected and experienced professional identities. Organization Science. doi: 10.1287/orsc.2015.0975.
  56. Ruppanner, Leah, and Matt Huffman. 2013. Blurred boundaries: Gender and work-family interference in cross-national context. Work and Occupations 32: 1–27.Google Scholar
  57. Sabelis, Ida H.J. 2007. The clock time paradox. In 24/7, ed. Robert Hassan and Ronald Purser, 255–278. Stanford: Stanford Business Books.Google Scholar
  58. Sharone, Ofer. 2004. Engineering overwork: Bell-curve management at a high-tech firm. In Fighting for time, ed. Arne Kalleberg and Cynthia Fuchs Epstein, 191–218. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
  59. Shih, Joanna. 2004. Project time in Silicon Valley. Qualitative Sociology 27: 223–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Strauss, Anselm, and Juliet Corbin. 1998. Basics of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  61. Tabboni, Simonetta. 2001. The idea of social time for Norbert Elias. Time & Society 10: 5–27.Google Scholar
  62. Vertovec, Steve. 2009. Transnationalism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  63. Viard, Jean. 2002. La sacre du temps libre: La société des 35 hueres. Paris: Éditions de L’Aube.Google Scholar
  64. Weiss, Robert S. 1994. Learning from strangers: The art and method of qualitative interview studies. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  65. Wharton, Amy, and Mary Blair-Loy. 2002. The overtime culture in a global corporation. Work and Occupations 19(1): 32–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Williams, Jon, and Heather Boushey. 2010. The three faces of work-family conflict. Washington: Center for American Progress.Google Scholar
  67. Yin, Robert. 1994. Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  68. Zeruvabel, Eviatar. 1981. Hidden rhythms. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of CaliforniaBerkeleyUSA

Personalised recommendations