Advertisement

Qualitative Sociology

, Volume 38, Issue 1, pp 19–25 | Cite as

A Feminist Carnal Sociology?: Embodiment in Sociology, Feminism, and Naturalized Philosophy

  • Victoria Pitts-TaylorEmail author
Article

Abstract

Wacquant’s vision of carnal sociology and enactive ethnography draws heavily from embodied mind theories in neurocognitive science and philosophy of mind. However, it also resonates with feminist epistemologies, such as sociologist Dorothy Smith's view that sociology should begin with and from the body. While both carnal sociology and the neurocognitive traditions it draws from ignore decades of feminist contributions to embodied epistemologies, I argue that feminist thought has much to contribute to materially grounded accounts of corporeal knowledge. Attention to feminist thought should also help enactive ethnographers consider the limits to the method, and the ethical and political complexities of embodied, situated knowledge.

Keywords

Ebodiment Epistemology Neurocognitive science Carnal sociology Feminism Situated knowledge 

References

  1. Ahmed, Sara. 2006. Orientations: Toward a queer phenomenology. GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies 12(4): 543–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alcoff, Linda Martín. 2006. Visible identities: Race, gender and the self. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blackman, Lisa. 2012. Immaterial bodies: Affect, embodiment, mediation. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bluhm, Robyn, Anne Jaap Jacobson, and Heidi Lene Maibom (eds.). 2012. Neurofeminism: Issues at the intersection of feminist theory and cognitive science. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  5. Cerulo, Karen. 2010. Mining the intersections of cognitive sociology and neuroscience. Poetics 38: 115–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Clark, Andy. 2008. Pressing the flesh: A tension in the study of the embodied, embedded mind? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research LXXVI(I): 37–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Clough, Patricia. 2010. The affective turn: Political economy, biomedia, and bodies. In The affect theory reader, ed. Melissa Gregg and Gregory Seigworth, 206–228. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Collins, Patricia Hill. 1990. Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment. Harper CollinsGoogle Scholar
  9. Connolly, William. 2010. A world of becoming. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Connolly, William. 2011. The complexity of intention. Critical Inquiry 37(4): 791–798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Crenshaw, Kimberlé. 1989. Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum 140: 139–167.Google Scholar
  12. Crossley, Nick. 1996. Body-subject/body-power: Agency, inscription and control in Foucault and Merleau-Ponty. Body and Society 2(2): 99–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fuchs, Thomas. 2005. Overcoming dualism. Philosophy, Psychiatry, & Psychology 12(2): 115–117.Google Scholar
  14. Fuchs, Thomas. 2009. Embodied cognitive neuroscience and its consequences for psychiatry. Poiesis Prax, published online Jan 23 2009. Accessed Jan 1 2012Google Scholar
  15. Fujimura, Joan. 2006. “Sex genes”: A critical sociomaterial approach to the politics and molecular genetics of sex determination. Signs 32(1): 49–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Glannon, Walter. 2002. Depression as a mind-body problem. Philosophy, Psychiatry and Psychology 9(3): 243–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Glannon, Walter. 2009. Our brains are not us. Bioethics 23(6): 321–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Haraway, Donna. 1988. Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies 14(3): 575–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hartstock, Nancy. 1983. The feminist standpoint: Developing a specifically feminist historical materialism. In Discovering reality: Feminist perspectives on epistemology and methodology, ed. Sandra Harding and Merrill Hintikka, 283–310. New York: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  20. Hayles, N. Katherine. 1993. Virtual bodies and flickering signifiers. October 66: 69–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hemmings, Clare. 2012. Affective solidarity: feminist reflexivity and political transformation. Feminist Theory 13(2): 147–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Rouse, Joseph. 2009. Barad’s Feminist Naturalism. Hypatia 19(1): 142–61.Google Scholar
  23. Lakoff, George and Mark Johnson. 1999. Philosophy In The Flesh. Kindle EditionGoogle Scholar
  24. Latour, Bruno. 2004. Why has critique run out of steam?: From matters of fact to matters of concern. Critical Inquiry 30(2): 225–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lizardo, Omar. 2014, Forthcoming. Beyond the comtean schema: The sociology of culture and cognition versus cognitive social science. Sociological Forum 29 (4)Google Scholar
  26. Longino, Helen. 2010. Feminist epistemology at Hypatia’s 25th anniversary. Hypatia 25(4): 733–741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Martin, Emily. 2000. Mind/body problems. American Ethnologist 27(3): 569–590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Noe, Alva. 2009. Out of Our Heads: You Are Not Your Brain, and Other Lessons from the Biology of Consciousness. Hill and WangGoogle Scholar
  29. Pitts-Taylor, Victoria. 2013. I feel your pain: Embodied knowledges and situated neurons. Hypatia: a Journal of Feminist Philosophy 28(4): 852–869.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Pitts-Taylor, Victoria. 2014. The mind in the body: Feminist and neurocognitive perspectives on embodiment. In NeuroCultures, neurogenderings, ed. Schmitz Sigrid and Hoppner Grit, 187–201. Zaglossus: Referat Genderforschung, University of Vienna.Google Scholar
  31. Pitts-Taylor, Victoria. Forthcoming. The Brain’s Body: Neuroscience and Corporeal Politics. Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Protevi, John. 2009. Political affect: Connecting the social and the somatic. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  33. Protevi, John. 2013. Life, war, earth: Delueze and the sciences. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  34. Radley, Alan. 1995. The elusory body and social constructionist theory. Body & Society 1(2): 3–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rose, Nikolas. 2006. The politics of life itself: Medicine, power and subjectivity in the twenty-first century. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Scully, Jackie Leach. 2008. Disability bioethics: Moral bodies, moral difference. New York: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
  37. Shilling, Chris. 2003. The body in social theory. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  38. Smith, Dorothy E. 1991. The conceptual practices of power: A feminist sociology of knowledge. Boston: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Smith, Dorothy E. 1992. Sociology from women’s experience: A reaffirmation. Sociological Theory 10(1): 88–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Smith, Dorothy E. 1988. The everyday world as problematic: A feminist sociology. Boston: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Solomon, Miriam. 2007. Situated cognition. In Philosophy of psychology and cognitive science, ed. Paul Thagard, 413–428. NY: Elesvier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Varela, Francesco, Evan Thompson and Eleanor Rosch. 1991. The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience. MIT press.Google Scholar
  43. Watson, Sean. 1998. The neurobiology of sorcery: Deleuze and Guattari’s brain. Body & Society 4(4): 23–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Young, Iris Marion. 1990. Throwing like a girl: And other essays in feminist philosophy and social theory. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Wesleyan UniversityMiddletownUSA

Personalised recommendations