Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

“Who Better to Do It Than Me!:” Race, Gender & the Deciding to Run Accounts of Political Women in Texas

  • Published:
Qualitative Sociology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Women remain underrepresented in electoral politics at every level. Much has been written about how dominant gender values shape political women’s decisions to run for office, how the media portrays women on the campaign trail, and how voters respond to women candidates. Yet, research on women in politics has too often assumed a monolithic standard of femininity, overlooking the ways in which gender values are varied and deeply racialized. Drawing from data gathered through 46 interviews I conducted with women leaders and political activists in Texas, I explore the narratives politically active women cultivate to account for their decisions whether or not to run for public office. I illuminate how these “deciding to run” narratives reflect racialized standards of femininity and how these discourses are mediated by the political context and by political and activist organizations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, Karrin, and Kristina Sheeler. 2005. Governing codes: gender, metaphor, and political identity. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beauboeuf-Lafontant, Tamara. 2007. You have to show strength: an exploration of race, gender, and depression. Gender & Society 21: 28–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beauboeuf-Lafontant, Tamara. 2009. Behind the mask of the strong black woman: voice and the embodiment of a costly performance. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bedolla, Garcia, Katherine Tate Lisa, and Janelle Wong. 2005. Indelible effects: the impact of women of color in the U.S. Congress. In Women and elective office: past, present, and future, 2nd ed, ed. Sue Thomas and Clyde Wilcox, 152–175. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bickerstaff, Steve. 2007. Lines in the sand: Texas redistricting and the fall of Tom delay. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackwell, Maylei. 2011. Chicana power!: contested histories of feminism in the Chicano movement. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Center for American Women and Politics. 2013. State by State Fact Sheets. New Brunswick, NJ: Center for American Women and Politics. http://www.cawp.rutgers.edu/fast_facts/resources/state_fact_sheet.php. Retrieved April 23, 2014

  • Chase, Susan. 1995. Ambiguous empowerment: the work narratives of women school superintendents. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choo, Hae Yeong, and Myra Marx Ferree. 2010. Practicing intersectionality in sociological research: a critical analysis of inclusions, interactions, and institutions in the study of inequalities. Sociological Theory 28: 129–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crenshaw, Kimberlé. 1991. Mapping the margins: intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review 43: 1241–1299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, Kathy. 2008. Intersectionality as buzzword: a sociology of science perspective on what makes a feminist theory successful. Feminist Theory 9: 67–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ewick, Patricia, and Silbey Susan. 1995. Subversive stories and hegemonic tales: toward a narrative sociology. Law and Society Review 29: 197–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia Bedolla, Lisa. 2007. Intersections of inequality: understanding marginalization and privelege in the post-civil rights Era. Politics & Gender 3: 232–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, James. 1996. Race, campaign politics, and realignment in the south. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, James. 2005. The hand of the past in southern politics. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gubrium, Jaber, and James Holstein. 2009. Analyzing narrative reality. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardy-Fanta, Carol. 1993. Latina politics, Latino politics: gender, culture, and political participation in Boston. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardy-Fanta, Carol, Pei-te Lin, Diane Pinderhughes, and Christine Cierra. 2006. Gender, race, and descriptive representation in the united states: findings from the gender and multicultural leadership project. In Intersectionality and politics: recent research on gender, race, and political representation in the united states, ed. Carol Hardy-Fanta, 7–41. New York: Haworth Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey Wingfield, Adia. 2007. The modern mammy and the angry black Man. Race Gender & Class 14: 196–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkesworth, Mary. 2003. Congressional enactments of race-gender: toward a theory of raced-gendered institutions. American Political Science Review 97: 529–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higginbotham, Evelyn. 1993. Righteous discontent: the women’s movement in the black baptist church, 1880–1920. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill Collins, Patricia. 2000. Black feminist thought: knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. New York: Routlege.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaramillo, Patricia. 2010. Building a theory, measuring a concept: exploring intersectionality and Latina activism at the individual level. Journal of Women, Politics & Policy 31: 193–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, Jennifer, and Wendy Martinek. 2009. The effects of race and gender on the judicial ambitions of state trial court judges. Political Research Quarterly 62: 379–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Junn, Jane, and Nadia Brown. 2008. What revolution?: incorporating intersectionality in women and politics. In Christina wolbrecht, Karen breckwith, and Lisa Valdez, ed. Political Women and American Democracy, 64–78. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landry, Bart. 2002. Black working wives: pioneers of the american family revolution. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawless, Jennifer, and Richard Fox. 2005. It takes a candidate: Why women Don’t Run for office. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, Regina, and Melody Rose. 2010. Hillary Clinton’s race for the white house: gender politics and the media on the campaign trail. Boulder CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lublin, David. 2004. The republican south: democratization and partisan change. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lublin, David, and Sarah Brewer. 2003. The continuing dominance of traditional gender roles in southern elections. Social Science Quarterly 842: 379–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, Robert. 2005. Religion, race, and gender differences in political ambition. Politics & Gender 1: 577–596.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nakano Glenn, Evelyn. 2002. Unequal freedom: How race and gender shaped american citizenship and labor. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, Molly, and Monroe Kristen Renwick. 1998. Narrative in political science. Annual Review of Political Science 1: 315–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polletta, Francesca. 2006. It was like a fever: storytelling in protest and politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Polletta, Francesca, C.B.C. Pang, Gardner Beth Gharrity, and Motes Alice. 2011. The sociology of storytelling. Annual Review of Sociology 37: 109–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rice, Tom, and Diane Coates. 1995. Gender role attitudes in the southern united states. Gender & Society 9: 744–756.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riessman, Catherine. 2007. Narrative methods for the human sciences. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robnett, Belinda. 1997. How long? How long?: African american women in the struggle for civil rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rollins, Judith. 1987. Between women: domestics and their employers. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, Benita. 2004. Separate roads to feminism: black, Chicana, and white feminist movements in America’s second wave. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scola, Becky. 2006. Women of color in state legislatures: gender, race, ethnicity, and legislative officeholding. In Intersectionality and politics: recent research on gender, race, and political representation in the united states, ed. Carol Hardy-Fanta, 43–70. New York: Haworth Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simien, Evelyn. 2006. Black feminist voices in politics. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smooth, Wendy. 2006a. African american women and electoral politics: journeying from the shadows to the spotlight. In Gender and elections: shaping the future of american politics, ed. Susan Carroll and Richard Fox, 117–142. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smooth, Wendy. 2006b. Intersectionality in electoral politics: a mess worth making. Politics & Gender 2: 400–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taft, J.K. 2006. I’m Not a politics person: teenage girls, oppositional consciousness, and the meaning of politics. Politics & Gender 2: 329–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thornton Dill, Bonnie. 1994. Fictive Kin, paper sons, and compadrazgo. In Women of color in U.S. Society, ed. Zinn Maxine Baca and Dill Bonnie Thornton, 149–170. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, Johnny E. 2003. African american religion and the civil rights movement in Arkansas. Jackson, MS: University Press of Mississippi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, Johnny E. 2004. Vanguards of hope: the role of culture in mobilizing African american Women’s social activism in Arkansas. Sociological Spectrum 24: 129–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author wishes to thank Michael Young, Christine Williams, Pamela Paxton, and the editors and anonymous reviewers for feedback on earlier drafts of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Angela Frederick.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Frederick, A. “Who Better to Do It Than Me!:” Race, Gender & the Deciding to Run Accounts of Political Women in Texas. Qual Sociol 37, 301–321 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-014-9282-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-014-9282-z

Keywords

Navigation