Skip to main content
Log in

Urban ANTs: A Review Essay

Urban Assemblages: How Actor-Network Theory Changes Urban Studies. Ignacio Farías and Thomas Bender (Eds.). New York: Routledge. 2010. ISBN 0415486629. 333 pages, $150.00 (cloth)

  • SPECIAL ISSUE ON KNOWLEDGE IN PRACTICE
  • Published:
Qualitative Sociology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Amin, A. (2007). Re-thinking the urban social. City, 11, 100–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brenner, N. (2009). What is critical urban theory? City, 13, 198–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Callon, M. (1986). Some elements of a sociology of translation: Domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St. Brieuc Bay. In J. Law (Ed.), Power, action and belief: A new sociology of knowledge? (pp. 196–223). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castree, N. (2002). False antitheses? Marxism, nature and actor-networks. Antipode, 34, 111–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cronon, W. (1992). Nature’s metropolis: Chicago and the great West. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, S., & Marvin, S. (2001). Splintering urbanism: Networks infrastructures, technological mobilities and the urban condition. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Harman, G. (2009). Prince of networks: Bruno Latour and metaphysics. Melbourne: re.press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heynen, N., Kaika, M., & Swyngedouw, E. (Eds.). (2006). In the nature of cities: Urban political ecology and the politics of urban metabolism. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horkheimer, M. (1972). Critical theory: Selected essays. New York: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keil, R. (2005). Progress report—Urban political ecology. Urban Geography, 26, 640–651.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (1993). The pasteurization of France. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (1996). Aramis, or the love of technology. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (2003). The promises of constructivism. In D. Idhe & E. Selinger (Eds.), Chasing technoscience: Matrix for materiality (pp. 27–46). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (2005a). From Realpolitik to Dingpolitik: Or, how to make things public. In B. Latour & P. Weibel (Eds.), Making things public: Atmospheres of democracy (pp. 4–31). Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (2005b). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network theory. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • May, T., & Perry, B. (Eds.). (2005). The future of urban sociology. Sociology, 39, 343–370.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David J. Madden.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Madden, D.J. Urban ANTs: A Review Essay. Qual Sociol 33, 583–589 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-010-9167-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-010-9167-8

Navigation