Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

God can be Funny: Repertoires, Religion & Resistance

  • REVIEW ESSAY
  • Published:
Qualitative Sociology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • McAdam, D. (1986). Recruitment to high-risk activism: The case of Freedom Summer. The American Journal of Sociology, 92, 64–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tarrow, S. (2008). Charles Tilly and the practice of contentious politics. Social Movement Studies, 7, 225–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tilly, C. (2008). Describing, measuring, and explaining struggle. Qualitative Sociology, 31, 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tilly, C., & Goodin, R. E. (2006). It depends. In R. E. Goodin & C. Tilly (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of contextual political analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Sociology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, 11794, USA

    Louis Edgar Esparza

Authors
  1. Louis Edgar Esparza
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Louis Edgar Esparza.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Esparza, L.E. God can be Funny: Repertoires, Religion & Resistance. Qual Sociol 33, 105–109 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-009-9143-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-009-9143-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation