Skip to main content
Log in

Modeling Mechanisms of Contention: MTT’s Positivist Constructivism

  • Symposium on McAdam, Tarrow and Tilly's "Measuring Mechanisms of Contention"
  • Published:
Qualitative Sociology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Lichbach, M. I. (1995). The rebel’s dilemma. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lichbach, M. I. (1996). The cooperator’s dilemma. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lichbach, M. I. (1997). Contentious maps of contentious politics. Mobilization, 2, 87–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lichbach, M. I. (2005). How to organize your mechanisms: Research programs, stylized facts, and historical narratives. In C. Davenport, H. Johnston, & C. Mueller (Eds.) Repression and mobilization. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAdam, D., Tarrow, S., & Tilly, C. (2001). Dynamics of contention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarrow, S. (2003). Confessions of a recovering structuralist. Mobilization, 8, 134–141.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mark Irving Lichbach.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lichbach, M.I. Modeling Mechanisms of Contention: MTT’s Positivist Constructivism. Qual Sociol 31, 345–354 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-008-9104-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-008-9104-2

Keywords

Navigation