Qualitative Sociology

, Volume 29, Issue 2, pp 211–231 | Cite as

Sponsored Social Change in a Public Housing Project

Original Paper


Federal and local pressures have given rise to a hybrid organization that brings together disparate groups from the public and non-profit sectors to address complex social problems. This article examines one such organizational emergence of state-affiliated sponsorship. Based on data from a multi-method case study, we find that not only do members of the sponsoring organization use legitimate authority structures, existing laws, and social norms to reproduce their power, they do so with a state mandate that privileges their expertise and processes.


Sponsorship Legitimacy Interorganizational relations Collaboration Partnership 


  1. Bachrach, P., & Baratz, M. S. (1962). The two faces of power. American Political Science Review, 56, 947–952.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bensen, L., & Harkavy, I. (2000). Higher education’s third revolution: The emergence of the democratic cosmopolitan civic university. Cityscape: A Journal of Policy Development and Research, 5, 47–57.Google Scholar
  3. Bok, D. (1992). Reclaiming the public trust. Change, 24, 13–19.Google Scholar
  4. Boyer, E. (1994). Creating the new American college. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 40, A48.Google Scholar
  5. Brager, G., Specht, H., & Torczyner, J. (1987). Community organizing. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Brodkin, E., Fuqua, C., & Thoren, K. (2002). Contracting welfare reform: Uncertainties of capacity-building within disjointed federalism. Working paper on the project on the public economy of work. Chicago: The University of Chicago.Google Scholar
  7. Chaskin, R. J., Brown, P., Venkatesh, S., & Vidal, A. (2001). Building community capacity. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  8. Chaves, M., Stephens, L., & Galaskiewicz, J. (2004). Does government funding suppress nonprofits’ political activity? American Sociological Review, 69, 292–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cisneros, H. (1995). Universities and the urban challenge. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.Google Scholar
  10. Cobb, P. D., & Rubin, B. A. (2006). Contradictory interests, tangled power and disorganized organization. Administration & Society.Google Scholar
  11. Cox, D. N. (2000). Developing a framework for understanding university-community partnerships. Cityscapes: A Journal of Policy Development and Research, 5, 9–20.Google Scholar
  12. DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 82, 147–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Edwards, B., & Marullo, S. (1999). Universities in troubled times. American Behavioral Scientist, 42, 754–765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Eisenstein, Z. (1998). Theorizing and politicizing choice in the 1996 elections. In C. Y. H. Lo & M. Schwartz (Eds.), Social Policy and the Conservative Agenda. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  15. Feagin, J. R., Orum, A., & Sjoberg, G. (1991). A case for the case study. Chapel Hill: UNC Press.Google Scholar
  16. Fligstein, N. (2001). The architecture of markets: An economic sociology of twenty-first century capitalist societies. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Gardner, D. (2005). Ten lessons in collaboration. Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 10, Manuscript 1. Retrieved 2005 from http://www.nursingworld.org/ojin/topic26/tpc26_1.htmGoogle Scholar
  18. Gray, B. (1989). Collaborating: Finding common ground for multiparty problems. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  19. Hardy, C. (1994). Power and politics in organizations. In C. Hardy (Ed.), Managing strategic action. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  20. Hardy, C., Lawrence, T. B., & Grant, D. (2005). Discourse and collaboration: The role of conversations and collective identity. Academy of Management Review, 30, 58–77.Google Scholar
  21. Hardy, C., & Phillips, N. (1998). Strategies of engagement: Lessons from the critical examination of collaboration and conflict in an interorganizational domain. Organization Science, 9, 217–230.Google Scholar
  22. Hardy, C., Phillips, N., & Lawrence, T. B. (2003). Resources, knowledge and influence. The organizational effects of interorganizational collaboration. Journal of Management Studies, 40, 321–347.Google Scholar
  23. Himmelman, A. T. (1992). Communities working collaboratively for a change. Minneapolis, MN: The Himmelman Consulting Group.Google Scholar
  24. Hinings, C. R., & Greenwood, R. (2002). Disconnects and consequences in organization theory? Administrative Science Quarterly, 47, 411–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Holland, B. A. (2001). Characteristics of “engaged institutions” and sustainable partnerships, and effective strategies for change. Retrieved 2005, from http://www.oup.org/researchandpubs/engaged.pdf.Google Scholar
  26. Huxham, C. (1996). On the theory and practice of transformational collaboration: From social service to social justice. In C. Huxham (Ed.), Collaboration and collaborative advantage: Vol. 8. Creating collaborative advantage. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  27. Katz, M. (2001). The price of citizenship. New York: Metropolitan Books.Google Scholar
  28. Lawrence, T., Hardy, C., & Phillips, N. (2002). Institutional effects of interorganizational collaboration: The emergence of proto-institutions. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 281–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lukes, S. (1974). Power: A radical view. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  30. Maguire, S., Hardy, C., & Lawrence, T. B. (2004). Institutional entrepreneurship in emerging fields: HIV/AIDS treatment advocacy in Canada. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 657–679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Maurrasse, D. (2001). Beyond the campus. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  32. McKnight, J. (1995). The careless society: The community and its counterfeits. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  33. Mills, C. W. (1956). The power elite. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Nyden, P., Figert, A., Shibley, M., & Burrows, D. (1997). University community collaborative research: Adding chairs at the research table and effective models of collaboration. In P. Nyden, A. Figert, M. Shibley, & D. Burrows (Eds.), Building communities: Social science in action. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.Google Scholar
  35. Perrow, C. (2002). Organizing America: Wealth, power, and the origins of corporate capitalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependency perspective. London: Harper Collins College Division.Google Scholar
  37. Phillips, N. (1997). Bringing the organization back in: A comment on conceptualizations of power in upward influence research. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18, 43–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Powell, W. W., Koput, K. W., & Smith-Doerr, L. (1996). Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 116–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Rothschild, J., & Whitt, J. A. (1986). Cooperative workplace. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Rubin, V. (2000). Evaluating university-community partnerships: An examination of the evolution of questions and approaches. Cityscapes: A Journal of Policy Development and Research, 5, 219–230.Google Scholar
  41. Salamon, L. M. (1995). Partners in public service: Government-nonprofit relations in the modern welfare state. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Salamon, L. M. (2002). The resilient sector: The state of nonprofit America. In L. M. Salamon (Ed.), The state of the nonprofit sector. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
  43. Sandmann, L., & Baker-Clark, C. (1997). Characteristics and principles of university-community partnerships: A Delphi study. Proceedings of the 16th Midwest Research to Practice in Adult, Continuing and Community Education. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University.Google Scholar
  44. Selznick, P. (1966). TVA and the grassroots. New York: Harper Torchbook Edition.Google Scholar
  45. Shefner, J. (1999). Sponsors and the urban poor: Resources or restrictions. Social Problems, 46, 376–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Shefner, J., & Cobb, D. (2002). Hierarchy and partnership in New Orleans. Qualitative Sociology, 25, 273–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Stinchcombe, A. (1965). Social structure and organizations. In J. G. March (Ed.), Handbook of Organizations. Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
  48. Suchman, M. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20, 571–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Trist, E. (1993). Introduction to volume II. In E. Trist & H. Murray (Eds.), The Social Engagement of social science: A Tavistock Anthology, volume II: The Socio-Technical Perspective. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
  50. Weber, M. (1964). The theory of social and economic organization. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  51. Yin, R. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  52. Zylan, Y., & Soule, S. A. (2000). Ending welfare as we know it again: Welfare state retrenchment, 1989–1995. Social Forces, 792, 623–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Sociology and Criminal Justice StudiesSouthern Illinois University EdwardsvilleEdwardsvilleUSA
  2. 2.Department of Sociology, 901 McClung TowerUniversity of Tennessee – KnoxvilleKnoxvilleUSA
  3. 3.Department of ManagementUNC-CharlotteCharlotteUSA

Personalised recommendations