Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) genotypes, nine kabuli from Mexico and 9 desi from other countries, were investigated for their phenolic profiles and antioxidant activity (AA). Phenolics in methanol extracts (ME) were analyzed by ultra-performance liquid chromatography coupled to diode array detection and mass spectrometry (UPLC-DAD-MS), whereas the AA was measured as Trolox equivalents (TE) by ABTS, DPPH and FRAP methods. Twenty phenolic compounds were identified in the ME and their levels showed a great variability among the chickpea genotypes. Phenolic acids and flavonoids were the most abundant compounds in kabuli and desi genotypes, respectively. The AA values (μmol TE/ 100 g dw) by ABTS (278–2417), DPPH (52–1650), and FRAP (41–1181) were mainly associated with the content of sinapic acid hexoside, gallic acid, myricetin, quercetin, catechin, and isorhamnetin, suggesting they are the main compounds responsible for the AA. The sum of the AA obtained for standards of these compounds evaluated at the concentration found in the extracts accounted for 34.3, 69.8, and 47.0% of the AA in the extract by ABTS, DPPH, and FRAP, respectively. In the AA by DPPH, most of the mixtures of these compounds resulted in synergistic interactions. Three desi genotypes with black seeds (ICC 4418, ICC 6306, and ICC 3761) showed the highest AA and flavonoids content, whereas the most promising kabuli genotypes were Surutato 77, Bco. Sin. 92, and Blanoro that showed the highest values of phenolic acids. These genotypes represent good sources of antioxidants for the improvement of nutraceutical properties in chickpea.
Cicer arietinum L. Phenolics Antioxidant activity UPLC-DAD-MS
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
This research was funded by Universidad Autonoma de Sinaloa (PROFAPI). MFQS received a scholarship from CONACYT-Mexico. We thank Milagros Ramírez and Víctor Valenzuela (INIFAP) for the field work. We also thank Nancy Salazar-Salas (UAS) for the technical assistance and Cuauhtemoc Reyes-Moreno (UAS) for the analysis of the data and the critical revision of the manuscript.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Wood JA, Grusak MA (2007) Nutritional value of chickpea. In: Yadav SS, Redden RJ, Chen W, Sharma B (eds) Chickpea breeding and management. CAB International, Oxfordshire, pp 101–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh B, Singh JP, Kaur A et al (2017) Phenolic composition and antioxidant potential of grain legume seeds: a review. Food Res Int 101:1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heiras-Palazuelos MJ, Ochoa-Lugo MI, Gutierrez-Dorado R et al (2013) Technological properties, antioxidant activity and total phenolic and flavonoid content of pigmented chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) cultivars. Int J Food Sci Nutr 64(1):69–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Segev A, Badani H, Kapulnik Y et al (2010) Determination of polyphenols, flavonoids, and antioxidant capacity in colored chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). J Food Sci 75(2):S115–S119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sreerama YN, Sashikala VB, Pratape VM (2010) Variability in the distribution of phenolic compounds in milled fractions of chickpea and horse gram: evaluation of their antioxidant properties. J Agric Food Chem 58(14):8322–8330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aguilera Y, Duenas M, Estrella I et al (2011) Phenolic profile and antioxidant capacity of chickpeas (Cicer arietinum L.) as affected by a dehydration process. Plant Foods Hum Nutr 66(2):187–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mekky RH, Contreras MD, El-Gindi MR et al (2015) Profiling of phenolic and other compounds from Egyptian cultivars of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) and antioxidant activity: a comparative study. RSC Adv 5(23):17751–17767CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magalhaes SCQ, Taveira M, Cabrita ARJ et al (2017) European marketable grain legume seeds: further insight into phenolic compounds profiles. Food Chem 215:177–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
AOAC (1999) Official methods of analysis, 16th edn. AOAC International, GaithersburgGoogle Scholar
Re R, Pellegrini N, Proteggente A et al (1999) Antioxidant activity applying an improved ABTS radical cation decolorization assay. Free Radic Biol Med 26(9–10):1231–1237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brand-Williams W, Cuvelier ME, Berset C (1995) Use of a free-radical method to evaluate antioxidant activity. LWT-Food Sci Technol 28(1):25–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benzie IFF, Strain JJ (1996) The ferric reducing ability of plasma (FRAP) as a measure of “antioxidant power”: the FRAP assay. Anal Biochem 239(1):70–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marathe SA, Rajalakshmi V, Jamdar SN et al (2011) Comparative study on antioxidant activity of different varieties of commonly consumed legumes in India. Food Chem Toxicol 49(9):2005–2012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zia-Ul-Haq M, Iqbal S, Ahmad S et al (2008) Antioxidant potential of Desi chickpea varieties commonly consumed in Pakistan. J Food Lipids 15(3):326–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xu BJ, Chang SKC (2007) A comparative study on phenolic profiles and antioxidant activities of legumes as affected by extraction solvents. J Food Sci 72(2):S159–S166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang YK, Zhang X, Chen GL et al (2016) Antioxidant property and their free, soluble conjugate and insoluble-bound phenolic contents in selected beans. J Funct Foods 24:359–372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xu BJ, Yuan SH, Chang SKC (2007) Comparative analyses of phenolic composition, antioxidant capacity, and color of cool season legumes and other selected food legumes. J Food Sci 72(2):S167–S177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parmar N, Singh N, Kaur A et al (2016) Effect of canning on color, protein and phenolic profile of grains from kidney bean, field pea and chickpea. Food Res Int 89:526–532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lima VN, Oliveira-Tintino CDM, Santos ES et al (2016) Antimicrobial and enhancement of the antibiotic activity by phenolic compounds: gallic acid, caffeic acid and pyrogallol. Microb Pathog 99:56–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alshikh N, de Camargo AC, Shahidi F (2015) Phenolics of selected lentil cultivars: antioxidant activities and inhibition of low-density lipoprotein and DNA damage. J Funct Foods 18:1022–1038Google Scholar
Li PS, Shi XJ, Wei Y et al (2015) Synthesis and biological activity of isoflavone derivatives from chickpea as potent anti-diabetic agents. Molecules 20(9):17016–17040CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu S, Hou W, Yao P et al (2010) Quercetin protects against ethanol-induced oxidative damage in rat primary hepatocytes. Toxicol in Vitro 24(2):516–522Google Scholar
Zhang D, Chu L, Liu YX et al (2011) Analysis of the antioxidant capacities of flavonoids under different spectrophotometric assays using cyclic voltammetry and density functional theory. J Agric Food Chem 59(18):10277–10285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang S, Wang D, Liu Z (2015) Synergistic, additive and antagonistic effects of Potentilla fruticosa combined with EGb761 on antioxidant capacities and the possible mechanism. Ind Crop Prod 67:227–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peyrat-Maillard MN, Cuvelier ME, Berset C (2003) Antioxidant activity of phenolic compounds in 2,2 '-azobis (2-amidinopropane) dihydrochloride (AAPH)-induced oxidation: synergistic and antagonistic effects. J Am Oil Chem Soc 80(10):1007–1012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prior RL, Wu XL, Schaich K (2005) Standardized methods for the determination of antioxidant capacity and phenolics in foods and dietary supplements. J Agric Food Chem 53(10):4290–4302CrossRefGoogle Scholar