Skip to main content
Log in

Biochemical and Nutritional Characterization of Three Prickly Pear Species with Different Ripening Behavior

  • Published:
Plant Foods for Human Nutrition Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Biochemical and nutritional changes were studied during the ripening process of three Opuntia morphospecies with different ripening behavior: Naranjona (O. ficus-indica), Blanca Cristalina (Opuntia sp.), and Esmeralda (Opuntia sp.) of early, early-intermediate, and intermediate-late ripening, respectively. In loss of fresh weight, Naranjona showed the highest values, while in Blanca Cristalina and Esmeralda, a discrete weight loss was found. No significant differences were found among morphospecies in soluble solids, total titratable acidity and pH during the postharvest days. Blanca Cristalina and Esmeralda showed an increase in the content of carotenoids, while these diminished in Naranjona. The cell wall enzymes evaluated showed particular behaviors during the ripening of each morphospecies suggesting a fine biochemical control and not a clear relationship between fruit softening and enzyme activity. This study provides basic information on prickly pear ripening, in order to understand this process for its control and for improving shelf life.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. El-kossori RD, Villaume C, Boustani E, Sauvarie Y, Méjean L (1998) Composition of pulp, skin, seeds of prickly pears fruit (Opuntia ficus-indica sp.). Plant Foods Hum Nutr 52: 263–270.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Sáenz C (2000) Processing technologies and alternative for cactus pear (Opuntia spp) fruits and cladodes. J Arid Environ 46: 209–225.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Pimienta-Barrios E (1994) Prickly pear (Opuntia spp): A valuable fruit crop for semi-arid lands of Mexico. J Arid Environ 28: 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Carrillo-López A, Cruz-Hernández A, Cárabez-Trejo A, Guevara-Lara F, Paredes-López O (2002) Hydrolytic activity and ultraestructural changes in fruit skins from two prickly pear (Opuntia sp.) varieties during storage. J Agric Food Chem 50: 1681–1685.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Huber DJ (1983) The role of cell wall hydrolases in fruit softening. Hort Rev 5: 169–219.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Seymour GB, Gross KC (1996) Cell wall disassembly and fruit softening. Postharvest News Inform 7: 45N–52N.

    Google Scholar 

  7. AOAC (1994) Official Methods of Analysis, Chap 45. Washington, DC: Association of Official Analytical Chemists, pp 4–5.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Delgado-Vargas F, Paredes-López O (1996) Correlation of HPLC and AOAC methods to assess the All- trans-Lutein content in marigold flowers. J Sci Food Agric 72: 283–290.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. AOAC (1999) Official Methods of Analysis. Chap 4. Washington: Association of Official Analytical Chemists, pp 34–36.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Barrett DM, Gonzalez C (1994) Activity of softening enzymes during cherry maturation. J Food Sci 59: 574–577.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hagerman AE, Austin PJ (1986) Continuos spectrophotometric assay for plant pectin methyl esterase. J Agric Food Chem 34: 440–444.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Gross KC (1982) A rapid and sensitive spectrophotometric method for assaying polygalacturonase using 2-cyanocetamide. Hort Sci 17: 933–934.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Pressey R (1983) β-Galactosidases in ripening tomatoes. Plant Physiol 71: 933–934.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kader AA (1992) Postharvest Technology of Horticultural Crops. Oakland, CA: University of California Special Publication 3311, p 296.

  15. Sáenz C, Estévez, Sepúlveda E, Mecklenburg S (1998) Cactus pear fruit: A new source for natural sweetener. Plant Foods Hum Nutr 52: 141–149.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Stintzing FC (1999) Partial synthese und analytik von betaxanthinen in früdigr chten von Opuntia ficus-indica. Diploma thesis. Sttutgart, Germany: Hohenheim University, Institute of Food Technology, Hohenheim.

  17. Askar A, El-Samahy SK (1981) Chemical composition of prickly pear fruits. Deut Lebensm-Rundsch 77: 279–281.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Sawaya WN, Khalil JK, Al-Mohammad MM (1983) Nutritive value of prickly pear seeds, Opuntia ficus-indica. Plant Foods Hum Nutr 33: 91–97.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Sepúlveda E, Sáenz C (1990) Chemical and physical characteristics of prickly pear (Opuntia ficus indica) pulp. Rev Agroquím Tecnol Alim 30: 551–555.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ketsa S, Chidtragool S, Klein DJ, Lurie S (1998) Effect of heat treatment on changes in softening, pectic substances and activities of polygalacturonase, pectinesterase, and β-galactosidase of ripening mango. J Plant Physiol 153: 457–461.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Barka ES, Kalantari S, Makhlouf J, Arul J (2000) Impact of UV-C irradiation on the cell wall-degrading enzymes during ripening of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.) fruit. J Agric Food Chem 48: 667–671.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Jen JJ, Robinson ML (1984) Pectolytic enzymes in sweet bell peppers (Capsicum annuum L.). J Food Sci 49: 1085–1087.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Ross GS, Redgwell RJ, MacRae EA (1993) Kiwifruit β-galactosidase: Isolation and activity against specific fruit cell-wall polysaccharides. Planta 189: 499–506.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Octavio Paredes-López.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hernández-Pérez, T., Carrillo-López, A., Guevara-Lara, F. et al. Biochemical and Nutritional Characterization of Three Prickly Pear Species with Different Ripening Behavior. Plant Foods Hum Nutr 60, 195–200 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11130-005-8618-y

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11130-005-8618-y

Key Words

Navigation