Skip to main content

Change in Colour and Antioxidant Content of Tomato Cultivars Following Forced-Air Drying

Abstract

Three New Zealand grown tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.) cultivars, Aranka, Encore, and Flavourine, were analysed for colour (CIELAB L a b values), ascorbic acid, total phenolics, lycopene, and total antioxidant activity (ABTS assay). Colour analyses of the air-dried tomatoes showed that the colour degradation as measured by the L a b values was minimal, and the colour was not significantly different (p < 0.05) between each of the dried cultivars. In general, there was no significant difference (p < 0.01) between the fresh cultivars in terms of antioxidant components or total antioxidant activity. The average values obtained for antioxidant components in the three fresh cultivars were: ascorbic acid, 276 mg/100 g DM, total phenolics, 613 mg gallic acid equivalents (GAE)/100 g dry matter (DM) and lycopene 38 mg/100 g DM. Total antioxidant activity of the fresh cultivars was 2917 μmole Trolox equivalent antioxidant capacity (TEAC)/100 g DM. Following forced air-drying treatment at 42 C for 48 hr, all cultivars showed significant decreases in ascorbic acid, total phenolics and total antioxidant activity, and increases in extractable lycopene contents. This study was undertaken to identify cultivars that would provide the best colour and nutrient contents after commercial air drying.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Giovannucci E (1999) Tomatoes, tomato-based products, lycopene, and cancer: Review of the epidemiologic literature. J Nat Cancer Inst 91: 317–331.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kerkhofs NS, Lister CE, Savage GP (2003) Antioxidant compounds in fresh tomatoes. Proc Nutr Soc NZ 28: 96–104.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Sahlin E, Savage GP, Lister CE (2004) Investigation of the antioxidant properties of tomatoes after processing. J Food Comp Anal 17: 635–647.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Giovanelli G, Zanoni B, Lavelli V, Nanic R (2002) Water sorption, drying and antioxidant properties of dried tomato products. J Food Eng 52: 135–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Zanoni B, Peri C, Nani R, Lavelli V (1999) Oxidative heat damage of tomato halves as affected by drying. Food Res Int 31: 395–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Dewanto V, Wu X, Adom K, Liu R (2002) Thermal processing enhances the nutritional value of tomatoes by increasing total antioxidant activity. J Agric Food Chem 50: 3010–3014.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Olorunda AO, Aworh OC, Onuoha CN (1990) Upgrading quality of dried tomato: Effects of drying methods, conditions and pre-drying treatments. J Sci Food Agric 52: 447–454.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Shi J, Le Maguer M, Kakuda Y, Liptay A, Kiekamp F (1999) Lycopene degradation and isomerisation in tomato dehydration. Food Res Int 32: 15–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Shi J, Le Maguer M (2000) Lycopene in tomatoes: Chemical and physical properties affected by food processing. CRC Crit Rev Biotechnol 20: 293–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Stahl W, Sies H (1992) Uptake of lycopene and its geometrical isomers is greater from heat processed than from unprocessed tomato juice in humans. J Nutr 122: 2161–2166.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lavelli V, Hippeli S, Peri C, Elstner E (1999) Evaluation of radical scavenging activity of fresh and air-dried tomatoes by three model reactions. J Agric Food Chem 47: 3826–3831.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Labuza TP (1971) Kinetics of lipid oxidation in foods. CRC Crit Rev Food Technol 1: 355–405.

    Google Scholar 

  13. AOAC (2000) Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International, 17th edn. Gaithersburg, MD, USA: AOAC International.

  14. Molyneux S, Lister CE, Savage GP (2004) An investigation of the antioxidant properties and colour of glasshouse grown tomatoes. Int J Food Sci Nutr 55: 537–545.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Spanos G, Wrolstad R (1990) Influence of processing and storage on the phenolic composition of Thompson seedless grape juice. J Agric Food Chem 38: 1565–1571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Van Het Hof K, de Boer B, Tijburg L, Lucius B, Zijp I, West C, Hautvast J, Westrate J (2000) Carotenoid bioavailability in humans from tomatoes processed in different ways determined from the carotenoid response in the triglyceride-rich lipoprotein fraction of plasma after a single consumption and in plasma after four days of consumption. J Nutr 130: 1189–1196.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Miller N, Rice-Evans C (1997) Factors influencing the antioxidant activity determined by the ABTS•+ radical cation assay. Free Rad Res 26: 195–199

    Google Scholar 

  18. Stewart A, Bozonnet S, Mullen W, Jenkins G, Lean M, Crozier A (2000) Occurrence of flavonols in tomatoes and tomato-based products. J Agric Food Chem 48: 2663–2669.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Dumas Y, Dadomo M, Di Lucca G, Grolier P (2003) Effects of environmental factors and agricultural techniques on antioxidant content of tomatoes. J Sci Food Agric 83: 369–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Giovanelli G, Lavelli V, Peri C, Nobili S (1999) Variation in antioxidant components of tomato during vine and post-harvest ripening. J Sci Food Agric 79: 1583–1588.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Lavelli V, Peri C, Rizzolo A (2000) Antioxidant activity of tomato products as studied by model reactions using xanthine oxidase, myeloperoxidase, and copper induced lipid peroxidation. J Agric Food Chem 48: 1442–1448.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Vinson J, Hao Y, Su X, Zubick L (1998) Phenol antioxidant quality and quantity in foods: Vegetables. J Agric Food Chem 46: 3630–3634.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Martínez-Valverde I, Periago M, Provan G, Chesson A (2002) Phenolic compounds, lycopene and antioxidant activity in commercial varieties of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum). J Sci Food Agric 82: 323–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Hertog M, Hollman P, Katan M (1992) Content of potentially anticarcinogenic flavonoids of 28 vegetables and 9 fruits commonly consumed in the Netherlands. J Agric Food Chem 40: 2379–2383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Giovanelli G, Lavelli V, Peri C, Pagliarini E, Zanoni B, Spigno P (2001) The antioxidant activity of tomato. III. Effects of processing technologies on oxidative and heat damage. Acta Hort 542: 217–220.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Tomás-Barberán F, Espín J (2001) Phenolic compounds and related enzymes as determinants of quality in fruits and vegetables. J Sci Food Agric 81: 853–876.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Lister C, Wilson P, Vile G, Sutton K, Simmonds H (1999) Pigments: not just a pretty face. Proceedings of the Second South-West Pacific Nutrition and Dietetics Conference, pp 34–39.

  28. Pellegrini N, Serafini M, Colombi B, Del Rio D, Salvatore S, Bianchi M, Brighenti F (2003) Total antioxidant capacity of plant food, beverage and oil consumed in Italy by three different in vitro assays. J Nutr 133: 2812–2819.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Paganga G, Miller N, Rice-Evans C (1999) The polyphenolic content of fruit and vegetables and their antioxidant activities. What does a serving constitute? Free Rad Res 30: 153–162.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. P. Savage.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kerkhofs, N.S., Lister, C.E. & Savage, G.P. Change in Colour and Antioxidant Content of Tomato Cultivars Following Forced-Air Drying. Plant Foods Hum Nutr 60, 117–121 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11130-005-6839-8

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11130-005-6839-8

Key words

  • Antioxidant activity
  • Ascorbic acid
  • Forced-air drying
  • Lycopene
  • Tomato
  • Total phenolics